Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildData current as of 06 September 2026

ÍA vs Keflavík: match statistics

ÍA crest
ÍA
1 : 3half-time 0:1
Keflavík crest
Keflavík

ÍA vs Keflavík: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ÍA played Keflavík in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 8 May 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

ÍA: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Keflavík: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

ÍA scores 1.20 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Keflavík scores 1.20 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ÍA 60%, Keflavík 80%. Over 2.5: ÍA 60%, Keflavík 80%. League level: BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 74%.

xG, shots and style

ÍA has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.41. ÍA: 13.6 shots per match, Keflavík: 12.8.

Match halves

ÍA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Keflavík: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

ÍA: 46-60 (3 goals). Keflavík: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.94 goals per match, BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 74%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win. ÍA generates on average 2.03 xG at home versus Keflavík’s 1.46 xG on the road; the home side also hold an advantage in possession (51% vs 44%) and in shots (18 vs 13 on average) and shots on target (7 vs 5). Defensively ÍA concede 1.00 goal on average at home, while Keflavík concede 2.33 goals away, and the away loss rate on the road is 67%. At the same time the visitors are more efficient with their shots (conversion 13% vs 6%) and average 1.67 goals away versus 1.00 for the hosts, which keeps draw risk present. Considering the hosts’ superior chance creation and better defensive profile, I give them a moderate edge, but expect a tightly contested match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Keflavík has 100% BTTS this season and 0% clean sheets, while ÍA has 50% BTTS and 50% clean sheets, indicating a bias toward the 'both teams to score' scenario. Season averages: ÍA 0.5 goals scored and 1.5 conceded vs Keflavík 1.67 scored and 2.33 conceded — visitors score more often and both sides show defensive weakness. In the last 5 matches BTTS rates are 60% for ÍA and 80% for Keflavík, with last-5 averages of 1.2 scored and 2.0 conceded for both, which raises the likelihood of goals from both teams. xG shows 1.34 for the home side and 1.46 for the visitors, with xG against 1.39 vs 1.78; Keflavík averages 5.0 shots on target versus ÍA's 3.0 and has a higher conversion rate 13% vs 4%, so the visitors are more effective in creating and finishing chances. Considering the league-level BTTS of 73% and the fact Keflavík has never kept a clean sheet this season and sits at 100% BTTS, I rate 'BTTS - Yes' as the strongest signal (80% vs 20%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects 1.56 expected goals for ÍA (xG_for 1.34 vs opponent xG_against 1.78 -> average 1.56) and 1.43 for Keflavík (xG_for 1.46 vs xG_against 1.39 -> 1.43), totaling 2.99 expected goals. Keflavík has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, while ÍA has 50%; in the last 5 matches the Over2.5 rate is 60% for the home side and 80% for the visitors, with a league average of 3.87 goals/match, all favoring an Over 2.5 outcome. In their last 5 games ÍA scored 6 and conceded 10 (avg. 1.2 scored/2.0 conceded), and Keflavík 6 and 10 (1.2/2.0), meaning both teams have been involved in high-scoring affairs (approx. 3.2 goals per game in this sample). Keflavík registers 5.0 shots on target per game with a 13% conversion, whereas ÍA has 3.0 SOT and a 4% conversion, increasing the likelihood of more goals from the visitors. Considering xG 1.56+1.43=2.99, Keflavík’s season-long 100% Over2.5 rate and the league average of 3.87, I recommend Over 2.5 as the best market to back.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I expect a Half-Time draw and a Keflavík win after the match (X/2) as the most likely scenario. ÍA drew at the break in 100% of their home matches (2 of 2), averaging 0.5 goals scored and 0.5 conceded by half-time, which strongly favors a lead at the break being a draw. Keflavík averages 1.33 goals after the break, and matches involving them average 2.67 second-half goals, while ÍA have not scored after the break and average 1.0 second-half goals, which favors the visitors in the closing stages. The away side also has a higher seasonal goal output 1.67 versus 0.5, higher xG 1.46 versus 1.34 and better shot conversion 13% versus 4%, and they win more often (33% wins versus 0% for ÍA), so they are the favored team to produce a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, the percentage of matches in which both teams score is 100% for Keflavík and 50% for ÍA, and 73% in the league overall, which supports the scenario of an HT draw and second-half goals resulting in a Full-Time win for the visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
ÍAKeflavík
15Shots16
ÍAKeflavík
6Shots on target7
ÍAKeflavík
1.84xG1.93
ÍAKeflavík
5Corners7
ÍAKeflavík
66Dangerous attacks60
ÍAKeflavík
9Fouls8
ÍAKeflavík
0Cards1
ÍAKeflavík

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match1.2
ÍAKeflavík
2Goals conceded / match2
ÍAKeflavík
50%Average possession42%
ÍAKeflavík
5.6Shots on target / match4.2
ÍAKeflavík

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.6Shots per match12.8
ÍAKeflavík
5.6Shots on target4.2
ÍAKeflavík
8.8%Shot conversion9.4%
ÍAKeflavík
50%Possession42%
ÍAKeflavík
1.66xG for1.41
ÍAKeflavík
1.59xG against1.62
ÍAKeflavík

Shooting quality

ÍA: BalancedKeflavík: Balanced
ÍAKeflavík
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ÍA is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - ÍA · 0.8 pts / match - Keflavík

ÍA
DLDLW
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Keflavík
LLDWL
Season result split
20% W20% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ÍA scoring profile: strong

ÍA scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Keflavík keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Keflavík scoring profile: very strong

Keflavík scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while ÍA keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)6
ÍAKeflavík
10Goals conceded (season)10
ÍAKeflavík
3.2Average goals in match3.2
ÍAKeflavík
6Goals scored (last 5)6
ÍAKeflavík
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
ÍAKeflavík

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal80%
ÍAKeflavík
40%2 goals40%
ÍAKeflavík
20%3 goals0%
ÍAKeflavík
0%4 goals0%
ÍAKeflavík

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal80%
ÍAKeflavík
40%2 goals60%
ÍAKeflavík
40%3 goals60%
ÍAKeflavík
20%4 goals0%
ÍAKeflavík

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time40%
ÍAKeflavík
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ÍAKeflavík
0%Scored in both halves20%
ÍAKeflavík

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
ÍAKeflavík
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ÍAKeflavík
60%BTTS - last 580%
ÍAKeflavík

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
ÍAKeflavík
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
ÍAKeflavík
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ÍAKeflavík

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
ÍAKeflavík
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
ÍAKeflavík
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
ÍAKeflavík

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ÍA is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - ÍA · 0.6 pts / match - Keflavík

ÍA - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Keflavík - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.6
ÍAKeflavík
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.4
ÍAKeflavík
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
ÍAKeflavík
0.6Average goals (1st half)1.2
ÍAKeflavík
60%Clean sheet before half-time20%
ÍAKeflavík
80%No goal before half-time60%
ÍAKeflavík

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
ÍAKeflavík
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
ÍAKeflavík
1.6Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
ÍAKeflavík
2.6Average goals (2nd half)2
ÍAKeflavík
40%Clean sheet after half-time40%
ÍAKeflavík
60%No goal after half-time40%
ÍAKeflavík

ÍA - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.2

Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Keflavík - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ÍA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.6
Average goals in match0.62.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Keflavík - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ÍA
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Keflavík
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ÍA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Keflavík

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ÍALigaKeflavík
Average goals in match 3.203.94 3.20
Both teams scored 60%71% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%74% 80%
Clean sheets 0%16% 20%
Goal before half-time 60%81% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%87% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.94
Average goals per match
71%
Both teams scored
74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.19
Home goals / match
1.74
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
42%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KeflavíkSubstitutionOn: Ernir BjarnasonOff: Muhamed Alghoul
  2. KeflavíkSubstitutionOn: Marin MudražijaOff: Davíd Helgi Aronsson
  3. KeflavíkSubstitutionOn: Edon OsmaniOff: Eiður Orri Ragnarsson
  4. KeflavíkYellow cardIgnacio Heras Anglada

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of ÍA vs Keflavík?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍA 1:3 Keflavík. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ÍA vs Keflavík?

ÍA score 1.20 goals per game on average and Keflavík 1.20. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 60% of ÍA's matches and 80% of Keflavík's.

What form are ÍA and Keflavík in?

Over the last 5 games ÍA have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Keflavík 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍA vs Keflavík?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.