ÍBV vs FH: match statistics
ÍBV vs FH: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
ÍBV play FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
ÍBV: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. FH: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
ÍBV scores 1.73 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. FH scores 1.33 and concedes 2.07. League average: 4.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: ÍBV 80%, FH 67%. Over 2.5: ÍBV 67%, FH 60%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
FH has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.35. ÍBV: 11.7 shots per match, FH: 13.6.
Match halves
ÍBV: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.00. FH: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
ÍBV: 76-90+ (6 goals). FH: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 4.04 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 100%.
Match description
FH is the favourite: they sit 3rd in the table versus ÍBV in 12th, and in the last 5 matches FH recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, while ÍBV have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses. The visitors scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game) versus the hosts’ 10 goals (2.0 per game), giving FH an advantage in offensive efficiency. Defensively the gap is even clearer: FH conceded only 4 goals in those five games (0.8 per game), while ÍBV conceded 11 (2.2 per game), meaning the home side have clear defensive issues. Additionally FH average 2 points per game in the last 5 matches, whereas ÍBV only 1 point per game, and the visitors’ last two rounds are wins, indicating better momentum. Due to the table advantage, superior defence and higher points efficiency, I forecast a victory for the visitors.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| ÍBV | FH | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
ÍBV is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - ÍBV · 1.4 pts / match - FH
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
ÍBV is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.73 goals / match - ÍBV · 1.33 goals / match - FH
FH is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.2 goals / match - ÍBV · 2.07 goals / match - FH
ÍBV scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
FH scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — ÍBV
Over / Under — FH
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FH is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - ÍBV · 1.33 pts / match - FH
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ÍBV - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
ÍBV
FH
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| ÍBV | Liga | FH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.93 | 4.04 | ▼ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 14% | • 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 80% | 82% | ▼ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): ÍBV 1 - 2 - 0 FH. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of ÍBV vs FH?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍBV 1:1 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between ÍBV and FH?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches ÍBV won 1, FH won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before ÍBV vs FH?
ÍBV score 1.73 goals per game on average and FH 1.33. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 80% of ÍBV's matches and 67% of FH's.
What form are ÍBV and FH in?
Over the last 5 games ÍBV have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FH 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍBV vs FH?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.