Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildHásteinsvöllurData current as of 30 August 2026

ÍBV vs Thór: match statistics

ÍBV crest
ÍBV
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Thór crest
Thór

ÍBV vs Thór: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ÍBV played Thór in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Hásteinsvöllur. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

ÍBV: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Thór: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

ÍBV scores 1.50 and concedes 2.10 goals per match. Thór scores 1.00 and concedes 2.50. League average: 3.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ÍBV 75%, Thór 55%. Over 2.5: ÍBV 65%, Thór 60%. League level: BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

ÍBV has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.22. ÍBV: 12.3 shots per match, Thór: 11.2.

Match halves

ÍBV: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.90. Thór: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

ÍBV: 76-90+ (8 goals). Thór: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.95 goals per match, BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ÍBV are on a very poor run, without a win in their last 5 matches and with a 4:9 goal difference, while Thór have also scored only 3 goals during this period. The hosts are clearly more effective at home, averaging 1.7 goals per match compared with Thór’s 0.8 goals away from home, while their xG stands at 1.43 versus 1.23 for the visitors. Thór’s away defence is particularly error-prone: they concede an average of 3 goals per match, allow opponents an xG of 2.31 and have lost 70% of their away matches. ÍBV enjoy more possession (48% to 42%), register more shots on target (4.5 to 3.3) and have significantly better finishing efficiency, 13% compared with 7%. Both teams have defensive issues, so goals at both ends are possible; however, the hosts’ advantage in chance creation and Thór’s very poor away numbers point towards an ÍBV win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No scenario has a slight edge, as Thór scores only 0.8 goals per match on average and has managed just 3 goals in its last five games, or 0.6 per match. The visitors failed to score in 50% of their matches this season, while their BTTS rate over the last five rounds was only 20%, compared with 60% for ÍBV. ÍBV does have a weak defense, conceding an average of 2.0 goals with opponents’ xG at 2.07, but Thór’s current attacking form remains clearly below these figures. The hosts should have good chances of scoring against a team conceding an average of 3.0 goals, but the most likely outcome remains a match in which Thór fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have clear defensive issues: ÍBV concede an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Thór concede as many as 3.0, with average xG conceded of 2.07 and 2.31 respectively. The 1.5-goal line has been exceeded in 70% of ÍBV’s matches and 80% of Thór’s, strongly supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Their last five appearances produced averages of 1.8 and 1.6 goals conceded per match, respectively, despite weaker attacking output of just 0.8 and 0.6 goals. At the same time, the quality of chances created in this run remains higher, with xG at 1.42 for ÍBV and 1.32 for Thór, while the Icelandic league averages 3.95 goals per match. Over 1.5 is therefore the safest pick, as the weakness of both defenses provides a stronger signal than the risk of low attacking efficiency.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by an ÍBV win, as Thór have failed to lead at the break in any match this season and went into half-time trailing in 80% of their games. At the same time, ÍBV’s early-match form has weakened: in their last five appearances, the hosts have not led at half-time once, while both teams have averaged just 0.2 goals before the break during this period. After the restart, the hosts’ advantage should grow, as Thór concede an average of 3.0 goals per match and allow opponents an xG of 2.31, compared with ÍBV’s 2.0 goals conceded and opponent xG of 2.07. ÍBV also have the better overall season record: they have won 30% of their matches and averaged 1.0 point, while Thór have won just 10% of their games with an average of 0.5 points. Caution is warranted due to the hosts’ current run, having lost 4 of their last 5 matches, which makes a half-time draw a stronger scenario than an early ÍBV lead.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

73Possession (%)27
ÍBVThór
18Shots6
ÍBVThór
5Shots on target2
ÍBVThór
1.87xG0.75
ÍBVThór
7Corners2
ÍBVThór
54Dangerous attacks31
ÍBVThór
11Fouls19
ÍBVThór
1Cards7
ÍBVThór

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1
ÍBVThór
2.1Goals conceded / match2.5
ÍBVThór
49%Average possession42%
ÍBVThór
3.8Shots on target / match3.35
ÍBVThór

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.25Shots per match11.15
ÍBVThór
3.8Shots on target3.35
ÍBVThór
12.2%Shot conversion9%
ÍBVThór
49%Possession42%
ÍBVThór
1.38xG for1.22
ÍBVThór
1.59xG against2.19
ÍBVThór

Shooting quality

ÍBV: BalancedThór: Balanced
ÍBVThór
Accuracy (shots on target)31%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Thór is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - ÍBV · 0.8 pts / match - Thór

ÍBV
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W25% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-11
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Thór
DWLLL
Season result split
20% W15% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-13
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ÍBV is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - ÍBV · 1 goals / match - Thór

ÍBV is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.1 goals / match - ÍBV · 2.5 goals / match - Thór

ÍBV scoring profile: very strong

ÍBV scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

Thór scoring profile: very strong

Thór scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 matches).

30Goals scored (season)20
ÍBVThór
42Goals conceded (season)50
ÍBVThór
3.6Average goals in match3.5
ÍBVThór
4Goals scored (last 5)3
ÍBVThór
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
ÍBVThór

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal65%
ÍBVThór
40%2 goals30%
ÍBVThór
10%3 goals5%
ÍBVThór
10%4 goals0%
ÍBVThór

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal85%
ÍBVThór
60%2 goals60%
ÍBVThór
20%3 goals45%
ÍBVThór
15%4 goals35%
ÍBVThór

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time15%
ÍBVThór
10%BTTS in both halves0%
ÍBVThór
20%Scored in both halves5%
ÍBVThór

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ÍBVThór
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
ÍBVThór
60%BTTS - last 520%
ÍBVThór

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
ÍBVThór
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
ÍBVThór
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
ÍBVThór

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
ÍBVThór
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
ÍBVThór
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
ÍBVThór

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ÍBV is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / match - ÍBV · 0.7 pts / match - Thór

ÍBV - half-time state
20% leading35% draw45% trailing
Thór - half-time state
15% leading25% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per match (1st half)0.7
ÍBVThór
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.35
ÍBVThór
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)1.15
ÍBVThór
1.55Average goals (1st half)1.5
ÍBVThór
35%Clean sheet before half-time30%
ÍBVThór
60%No goal before half-time75%
ÍBVThór

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per match (2nd half)1.05
ÍBVThór
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
ÍBVThór
1.15Goals conceded (2nd half)1.35
ÍBVThór
2.05Average goals (2nd half)2
ÍBVThór
25%Clean sheet after half-time30%
ÍBVThór
40%No goal after half-time55%
ÍBVThór

ÍBV - second-half results

25% W30% R45% P
19
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Thór - second-half results

25% W30% R45% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ÍBV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Thór - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ÍBV
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
4
9
16-30
3
6
31-45
4
12
46-60
6
6
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Thór
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
0
10
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.55
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ÍBV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Thór

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.97
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ÍBVLigaThór
Average goals in match 3.603.95 3.50
Both teams scored 75%71% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%69% 60%
Clean sheets 5%16% 15%
Goal before half-time 80%82% 80%
Goal after half-time 90%87% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.95
Average goals per match
71%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.14
Home goals / match
1.81
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
15%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ThórYellow cardVíctor Bertomeu de la O
  2. ÍBVYellow cardMilan Tomić
  3. ThórYellow cardAtli Sigurjónsson
  4. ThórYellow cardKevin Vázquez Comesaña
  5. ThórYellow cardChristian Jakobsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: ÍBV 1 - 0 - 0 Thór. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of ÍBV vs Thór?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍBV 0:1 Thór. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ÍBV vs Thór?

ÍBV score 1.50 goals per game on average and Thór 1.00. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 75% of ÍBV's matches and 55% of Thór's.

What form are ÍBV and Thór in?

Over the last 5 games ÍBV have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Thór 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍBV vs Thór?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.