Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 12 September 2026

Ilirija vs Dekani: match statistics

Ilirija crest
Ilirija
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Dekani crest
Dekani
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight bias towards a draw. Ilirija displays poor home form with only a 22% win rate at their ground, although they have won their last two home matches. Dekani are characterized by a high percentage of draws away (56%), which, given their defensive stance (averaging 1.11 goals conceded), suggests scoring difficulties (FTS% 44%). Both teams have a similar shot conversion rate (8%) and comparable xG metrics, confirming the balanced level. Recent overall form slightly favors Dekani (1.6 PPG vs 1.4 PPG); however, their issues scoring away and Ilirija's trend of improvement in recent home fixtures argue for a draw.

Ilirija vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilirija played Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 20 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Ilirija: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Dekani: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilirija scores 1.26 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. Dekani scores 1.21 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilirija 74%, Dekani 53%. Over 2.5: Ilirija 58%, Dekani 53%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Ilirija has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.32. Ilirija: 13.1 shots per match, Dekani: 9.5.

Match halves

Ilirija: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.68. Dekani: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Ilirija: 16-30 (6 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight bias towards a draw. Ilirija displays poor home form with only a 22% win rate at their ground, although they have won their last two home matches. Dekani are characterized by a high percentage of draws away (56%), which, given their defensive stance (averaging 1.11 goals conceded), suggests scoring difficulties (FTS% 44%). Both teams have a similar shot conversion rate (8%) and comparable xG metrics, confirming the balanced level. Recent overall form slightly favors Dekani (1.6 PPG vs 1.4 PPG); however, their issues scoring away and Ilirija's trend of improvement in recent home fixtures argue for a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
IlirijaDekani
5Shots10
IlirijaDekani
3Shots on target4
IlirijaDekani
1.12xG1.59
IlirijaDekani
6Corners3
IlirijaDekani
81Dangerous attacks93
IlirijaDekani
-1Fouls-1
IlirijaDekani
-1Cards-1
IlirijaDekani

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.26Goals scored / match1.21
IlirijaDekani
1.84Goals conceded / match1.37
IlirijaDekani
52%Average possession44%
IlirijaDekani
5.11Shots on target / match3.26
IlirijaDekani

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.05Shots per match9.53
IlirijaDekani
5.11Shots on target3.26
IlirijaDekani
9.7%Shot conversion12.7%
IlirijaDekani
52%Possession44%
IlirijaDekani
1.74xG for1.32
IlirijaDekani
1.6xG against1.39
IlirijaDekani

Shooting quality

Ilirija: BalancedDekani: Counter-attacking
IlirijaDekani
Accuracy (shots on target)39%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dekani is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ilirija · 1.6 pts / match - Dekani

Ilirija
LWLWD
Season result split
16% W37% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-9
0.84 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Dekani
LDWDW
Season result split
26% W26% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-9
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dekani is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.84 goals / match - Ilirija · 1.37 goals / match - Dekani

Ilirija scoring profile: very strong

Ilirija scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Dekani scoring profile: very strong

Dekani scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Ilirija keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

24Goals scored (season)23
IlirijaDekani
35Goals conceded (season)26
IlirijaDekani
3.11Average goals in match2.58
IlirijaDekani
7Goals scored (last 5)7
IlirijaDekani
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
IlirijaDekani

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal63%
IlirijaDekani
32%2 goals37%
IlirijaDekani
5%3 goals21%
IlirijaDekani
0%4 goals0%
IlirijaDekani

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal84%
IlirijaDekani
58%2 goals37%
IlirijaDekani
32%3 goals11%
IlirijaDekani
5%4 goals5%
IlirijaDekani

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time21%
IlirijaDekani
5%BTTS in both halves0%
IlirijaDekani
16%Scored in both halves16%
IlirijaDekani

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
IlirijaDekani
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
IlirijaDekani
60%BTTS - last 560%
IlirijaDekani

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
IlirijaDekani
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
IlirijaDekani
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
IlirijaDekani

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
IlirijaDekani
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
IlirijaDekani
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
IlirijaDekani

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilirija - half-time state
32% leading21% draw47% trailing
Dekani - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.16
IlirijaDekani
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.63
IlirijaDekani
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
IlirijaDekani
1.26Average goals (1st half)1.26
IlirijaDekani
47%Clean sheet before half-time42%
IlirijaDekani
58%No goal before half-time63%
IlirijaDekani

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.16
IlirijaDekani
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
IlirijaDekani
0.95Goals conceded (2nd half)0.74
IlirijaDekani
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.32
IlirijaDekani
42%Clean sheet after half-time47%
IlirijaDekani
42%No goal after half-time58%
IlirijaDekani

Ilirija - second-half results

32% W21% D47% L
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dekani - second-half results

26% W37% D37% L
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilirija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Dekani - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.20
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.0
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilirija
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
6
4
16-30
1
5
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
6
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
6
5
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilirija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

IlirijaLigaDekani
Average goals in match 3.112.82 2.58
Both teams scored 74%48% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%55% 53%
Clean sheets 16%30% 16%
Goal before half-time 84%77% 74%
Goal after half-time 89%79% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DekaniGoalDion Hoti
  2. IlirijaGoalNiko Grlić
  3. IlirijaGoalAgustín Urrutia

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Blaž BezjakMatches officiated: 10
0.9Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 230%Home wins20%Draws50%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ilirija 0 - 0 - 1 Dekani. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

NK Jadran Dekani
3 : 1
ND Ilirija 1911

FAQ

What was the result of Ilirija vs Dekani?

The 2. SNL match finished Ilirija 2:2 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilirija vs Dekani?

Ilirija score 1.26 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.21. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Ilirija's matches and 53% of Dekani's.

What form are Ilirija and Dekani in?

Over the last 5 games Ilirija have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Dekani 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilirija vs Dekani?

The statistical background for Ilirija vs Dekani — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.