Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 13 September 2026

Ilirija vs Nafta: match statistics

Ilirija crest
Ilirija
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Nafta crest
Nafta

Ilirija vs Nafta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilirija played Nafta in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 30 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Ilirija: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Nafta: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilirija scores 1.40 and concedes 1.76 goals per match. Nafta scores 2.32 and concedes 0.76. League average: 2.81 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilirija 76%, Nafta 60%. Over 2.5: Ilirija 64%, Nafta 48%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Ilirija has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.62. Ilirija: 11.8 shots per match, Nafta: 12.4.

Match halves

Ilirija: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.76. Nafta: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.32.

Goals by minute

Ilirija: 16-30 (8 goals). Nafta: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nafta is the clear favorite for this fixture: they sit 1st in the table with a season record of 20 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses, while Ilirija are 11th with 5 wins, 9 draws and 11 losses. The visitors have scored 58 goals this season and 13 in the last 5 matches, averaging 2.0 goals on the road, whereas Ilirija have 35 goals this season and 9 in the last 5, with a home scoring average of 1.33 goals per game. Defensively Nafta is superior: they concede 0.67 goals on average away and keep 58% clean sheets on the road, while Ilirija concede 1.83 goals at home and have a 17% clean sheet rate. Although Ilirija’s home xG is 1.73 versus Nafta’s 1.48 away, Nafta are more efficient in chance conversion (shot conversion 18% vs 11%) and have had no goalless away matches (0%), translating into better opportunity conversion. Considering Nafta’s 5 wins in their last 5 matches (average 3 points per game) compared to Ilirija’s recent form of 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses (average 1.4 points), I forecast a victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes at 68%: Ilirija at home has BTTS in 77% of season games and 80% in the last 5, scoring an average 2.62 goals per home match (last 5: 1.8) and registering 5.69 shots on target. Nafta away has 58% clean sheets and a season average of 0.67 goals conceded, but they themselves score 2.0 goals away and have netted 13 goals in the last 5 (2.6 avg), so they can respond. xG comparison shows Ilirija home xG 1.73, while Nafta in the last 5 has xG_for 1.42 and xG_against 1.04, indicating a real ability for both teams to create chances. Additionally, 69% of Ilirija matches finish over 2.5 goals, and the over 2.5 + BTTS combination occurs in 62% of their games, increasing the likelihood of both teams scoring. Although Nafta’s season BTTS rate is 42% and their defensive form is strong, Ilirija’s home statistical edge and Nafta’s attacking form lead me to choose Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5: both teams have Over 1.5 in 92% of their matches, while the league average is 2.81 goals per match. I project 1.65 goals for the home side (Ilirija: goals scored 2.62 and Nafta goals conceded 0.67 → (2.62+0.67)/2=1.65) and 1.43 for the away side (Nafta: 2.00 and 0.85 → (2.00+0.85)/2=1.43), totaling 3.08 goals. xG confirms high potential: Ilirija xG_for 1.73 vs Nafta xG_against 1.11 gives a base of 1.42, Nafta xG_for 1.48 vs Ilirija xG_against 1.38 gives 1.43, sum ≈2.85; high finishing rates (conversion 19% and 18%) and shot counts (13.54 vs 11.08) justify raising the forecast to 3.08. Based on this I estimate probabilities of Over 1.5 at 88%, Over 2.5 at 60% and Over 3.5 at 36% (Under respectively 12%, 40%, 64%). I recommend backing the over at 1.5 as the strongest signal — the high seasonal frequency of 92% and a 3.08 goal projection provide the greatest edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Nafta led at the break in 8 matches, i.e. in 67% of cases, and Nafta’s average first-half goals are 1.08 versus Ilirija’s 0.92, giving the visitors the halftime lead. However, the key signal is Ilirija’s post-break form: the home side scores on average 1.69 goals in the second half and wins that half in 69% of matches while conceding only 0.54 goals on average after the break. Additionally, Ilirija has a higher seasonal home goals average of 2.62 compared to Nafta’s 2.00 and a high rate of matches with both teams scoring (BTTS 77% for the hosts vs 42% for the visitors), which increases the likelihood of a comeback. On the other hand, Nafta is in excellent form (5 wins in their last 5 matches, 100% in the last 5), so the 2/2 outcome is also plausible. Summing the above figures, the strongest signal is the 2/1 scenario — Nafta leads at half-time, and Ilirija stages a turnaround after the break to win the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
IlirijaNafta
11Shots11
IlirijaNafta
2Shots on target6
IlirijaNafta
1.47xG1.54
IlirijaNafta
3Corners4
IlirijaNafta
87Dangerous attacks58
IlirijaNafta
14Fouls9
IlirijaNafta
0Cards0
IlirijaNafta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match2.32
IlirijaNafta
1.76Goals conceded / match0.76
IlirijaNafta
52%Average possession52%
IlirijaNafta
4.72Shots on target / match5.12
IlirijaNafta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.76Shots per match12.36
IlirijaNafta
4.72Shots on target5.12
IlirijaNafta
11.9%Shot conversion18.8%
IlirijaNafta
52%Possession52%
IlirijaNafta
1.64xG for1.62
IlirijaNafta
1.56xG against1.25
IlirijaNafta

Shooting quality

Ilirija: BalancedNafta: Efficient finishing
IlirijaNafta
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nafta is 114% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ilirija · 3 pts / match - Nafta

Ilirija
LLDWW
Season result split
20% W36% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-11
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-5
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Nafta
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
80% W20% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-5-0
2.60 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-3-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta is 66% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Ilirija · 2.32 goals / match - Nafta

Nafta is 132% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.76 goals / match - Ilirija · 0.76 goals / match - Nafta

Ilirija scoring profile: very strong

Ilirija scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 matches).

Nafta scoring profile: very strong

Nafta scores in 100% of matches (25 of 25 matches), while Ilirija keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).

35Goals scored (season)58
IlirijaNafta
44Goals conceded (season)19
IlirijaNafta
3.16Average goals in match3.08
IlirijaNafta
9Goals scored (last 5)13
IlirijaNafta
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
IlirijaNafta

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal100%
IlirijaNafta
40%2 goals76%
IlirijaNafta
8%3 goals32%
IlirijaNafta
4%4 goals20%
IlirijaNafta

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal60%
IlirijaNafta
56%2 goals16%
IlirijaNafta
28%3 goals0%
IlirijaNafta
4%4 goals0%
IlirijaNafta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time20%
IlirijaNafta
4%BTTS in both halves8%
IlirijaNafta
16%Scored in both halves52%
IlirijaNafta

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
IlirijaNafta
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
IlirijaNafta
80%BTTS - last 540%
IlirijaNafta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
IlirijaNafta
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
IlirijaNafta
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
IlirijaNafta

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
IlirijaNafta
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
IlirijaNafta
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
IlirijaNafta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nafta is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - Ilirija · 2.12 pts / match - Nafta

Ilirija - half-time state
32% leading20% draw48% trailing
Nafta - half-time state
60% leading32% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)2.12
IlirijaNafta
0.56Goals scored (1st half)1
IlirijaNafta
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.28
IlirijaNafta
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.28
IlirijaNafta
44%Clean sheet before half-time72%
IlirijaNafta
60%No goal before half-time28%
IlirijaNafta

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)2.08
IlirijaNafta
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)1.32
IlirijaNafta
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
IlirijaNafta
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.8
IlirijaNafta
48%Clean sheet after half-time56%
IlirijaNafta
40%No goal after half-time20%
IlirijaNafta

Ilirija - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
29
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding63%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nafta - second-half results

60% W28% D12% L
53
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilirija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+9
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilirija
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
8
6
16-30
2
7
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
4
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
7
3
16-30
10
2
31-45
9
2
46-60
11
7
61-75
13
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
88%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilirija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
183%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

IlirijaLigaNafta
Average goals in match 3.162.81 3.08
Both teams scored 76%50% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%54% 48%
Clean sheets 16%29% 40%
Goal before half-time 84%74% 80%
Goal after half-time 88%80% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.81
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ilirija 0 - 0 - 1 Nafta. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

NK Nafta 1903 Lendava
2 : 1
ND Ilirija 1911

FAQ

What was the result of Ilirija vs Nafta?

The 2. SNL match finished Ilirija 0:2 Nafta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilirija vs Nafta?

Ilirija score 1.40 goals per game on average and Nafta 2.32. The 2. SNL average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Ilirija's matches and 60% of Nafta's.

What form are Ilirija and Nafta in?

Over the last 5 games Ilirija have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Nafta 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilirija vs Nafta?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.