Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Ilves vs Jaro: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
5 : 0half-time 4:0
Jaro crest
Jaro

Ilves vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilves played Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 17 June 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Ilves: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Jaro: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilves scores 1.27 and concedes 1.91 goals per match. Jaro scores 0.91 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilves 64%, Jaro 45%. Over 2.5: Ilves 64%, Jaro 55%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Jaro has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.12. Ilves: 9.1 shots per match, Jaro: 11.8.

Match halves

Ilves: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.64. Jaro: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

Ilves: 16-30 (4 goals). Jaro: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilves is the clear favorite: over the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals and won 4, averaging 2.4 points per game, while Jaro has only 1 win, 6 goals and 0.6 points per game in the same period. At home Ilves scores 1.2 goals and concedes 1.2, with 60% clean sheets, whereas Jaro averages just 0.33 goals on the road, failed to score in 67% of away matches and concedes 2.17 goals per game. In terms of quality of chances Ilves posts xG 1.1 at home versus Jaro’s xG 1.39 away, but the visitors convert only 3% of shots with 12.33 shots per game on average, while the hosts convert 15% with 8.2 shots, which favors Ilves’ efficiency. Jaro conceded 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 avg) versus Ilves’ 7 conceded (1.4 avg), which together with better form and lower defensive vulnerability points to a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I pick 'no' (BTTS - No) as the most likely outcome (70% vs 30%) because Jaro averages only 0.33 goals per game across the season and finishes goalless in 67% of matches. Ilves holds a clear offensive edge: 1.6 goals per game, xG 1.52 and 5.0 shots on target per match; in the last 5 games the home side scored 9 goals (avg 1.8). Despite a seasonal xG of 1.39, Jaro has only 10 goals scored, a very low shot conversion rate of 3% and 3.83 shots on target per game — they create chances but rarely finish them. Additionally, Jaro concedes on average 2.17 goals this season and 3.0 goals in the last 5 games (15 conceded), while the league shows a high clean sheet rate of 56% with BTTS 50% — this overall favors a scenario where only one team scores. Considering Ilves is likely to score (xG 1.52, 1.8 goals in the last 5) and Jaro struggles massively with finishing (0.33 seasonally, 3% conversion), I assign 70% to 'no' and 30% to 'yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate Ilves to score about 1.50 goals (home xG 1.52 and Jaro’s defensive xG 1.48 → average 1.50) and Jaro about 1.30 goals (away xG 1.39 and Ilves’ defensive xG 1.21 → 1.30), giving a total ~2.80 expected goals. With λ=2.80 the Poisson distribution yields roughly a 77% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 53% for Over 2.5 and about 31% for Over 3.5. Seasonal data confirm a scoring tendency: Ilves averages 1.6 goals, 5.0 shots on target and a 14% conversion rate; Jaro averages 3.83 shots on target, 3% conversion and 0.33 goals per season; meanwhile the percentage of matches Over 1.5 is 80% for Ilves and 83% for Jaro. In the last 5 matches Ilves scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) and conceded 7 (1.4), while Jaro scored 6 (1.2) and conceded 15 (3.0), which further increases goal likelihood. Based on this, the strongest signal from the data is the Over 1.5 bet (selection: Over at the 1.5 line), since the combined xG 2.80 and seasonal Over 1.5 rates (80%/83%) imply a probabilistic edge of about 77%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ilves is a clear candidate to lead at the break: they were leading at half-time in 60% of matches (3 of 5) and average 1.2 goals by half-time versus Jaro’s 0.17. Additionally, Ilves has an xG of 1.52 versus the visitors’ 1.39, 5.0 shots on target per match compared to 3.83, and a conversion rate of 14% vs 3%, indicating the hosts convert chances into goals more frequently. For the full match Ilves scores 1.6 goals on average and has won 4 of the last 5 matches (80%), while Jaro averages 0.33 goals and has only a 20% win rate in the last 5. Ilves scored at least once by half-time in 100% of home matches, and Jaro led at half-time in only 17% of cases, so combining a 60% chance to lead at the break with an 80% win rate yields roughly a 48% probability for the 1/1 (Half-Time/Full-Time) scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

4 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
IlvesJaro
16Shots9
IlvesJaro
12Shots on target2
IlvesJaro
2.33xG1.19
IlvesJaro
6Corners3
IlvesJaro
66Dangerous attacks65
IlvesJaro
5Fouls9
IlvesJaro
1Cards1
IlvesJaro

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match0.91
IlvesJaro
1.91Goals conceded / match2
IlvesJaro
48%Average possession47%
IlvesJaro
3.36Shots on target / match4.36
IlvesJaro

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.09Shots per match11.82
IlvesJaro
3.36Shots on target4.36
IlvesJaro
14%Shot conversion7.7%
IlvesJaro
48%Possession47%
IlvesJaro
1.12xG for1.45
IlvesJaro
1.63xG against1.36
IlvesJaro

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingJaro: Balanced
IlvesJaro
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilves is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ilves · 0.6 pts / match - Jaro

Ilves
DLWLW
Season result split
27% W27% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-5
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Jaro
LLWLL
Season result split
9% W36% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-6
0.64 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Ilves · 0.91 goals / match - Jaro

Ilves is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.91 goals / match - Ilves · 2 goals / match - Jaro

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

Jaro scoring profile: strong

Jaro scores in 55% of matches (6 of 11 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

14Goals scored (season)10
IlvesJaro
21Goals conceded (season)22
IlvesJaro
3.18Average goals in match2.91
IlvesJaro
6Goals scored (last 5)6
IlvesJaro
10Goals conceded (last 5)15
IlvesJaro

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal55%
IlvesJaro
36%2 goals27%
IlvesJaro
0%3 goals9%
IlvesJaro
0%4 goals0%
IlvesJaro

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal82%
IlvesJaro
64%2 goals55%
IlvesJaro
36%3 goals27%
IlvesJaro
9%4 goals18%
IlvesJaro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time18%
IlvesJaro
18%BTTS in both halves9%
IlvesJaro
27%Scored in both halves18%
IlvesJaro

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
IlvesJaro
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
IlvesJaro
40%BTTS - last 540%
IlvesJaro

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
IlvesJaro
55%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
IlvesJaro
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
IlvesJaro

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
IlvesJaro
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
IlvesJaro
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
IlvesJaro

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves - half-time state
36% leading27% draw36% trailing
Jaro - half-time state
36% leading27% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.36
IlvesJaro
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.64
IlvesJaro
1.09Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
IlvesJaro
1.73Average goals (1st half)1.27
IlvesJaro
45%Clean sheet before half-time45%
IlvesJaro
36%No goal before half-time55%
IlvesJaro

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)0.64
IlvesJaro
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
IlvesJaro
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)1.36
IlvesJaro
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.64
IlvesJaro
36%Clean sheet after half-time36%
IlvesJaro
45%No goal after half-time73%
IlvesJaro

Ilves - second-half results

27% W36% R36% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jaro - second-half results

9% W36% R55% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding25%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.4
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
1
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
2
6
46-60
0
4
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
185%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaJaro
Average goals in match 3.182.47 2.91
Both teams scored 64%50% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%42% 55%
Clean sheets 27%28% 18%
Goal before half-time 91%75% 82%
Goal after half-time 91%75% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.03
Away goals / match
+40%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesGoalJardell Kanga
  2. IlvesYellow cardYiandro Raap
  3. JaroYellow cardJesper Svenungsen Skau
  4. IlvesGoalJardell Kanga
  5. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Anton PopovitchOff: Yiandro Raap
  6. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Roope RiskiOff: Teemu Hytönen
  7. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Joona VeteliOff: Otto Tiitinen
  8. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Oliver PetterssonOff: Tatu Miettunen
  9. JaroSubstitutionOn: Ludvig NymanOff: Aron Bjonbäck
  10. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Rasmus HalonenOff: Jardell Kanga
  11. IlvesGoalRoope RiskiAssist: Jesse Kilo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Ilves 2 - 0 - 0 Jaro. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FF Jaro
0 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
2 : 1
FF Jaro

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs Jaro?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 5:0 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and Jaro?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ilves won 2, Jaro won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs Jaro?

Ilves score 1.27 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.91. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Ilves's matches and 45% of Jaro's.

What form are Ilves and Jaro in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Jaro 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs Jaro?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.