Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Ilves vs TPS: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
1 : 0half-time 0:0
TPS crest
TPS

Ilves vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilves play TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 13 June 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Ilves: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. TPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilves scores 1.75 and concedes 1.88 goals per match. TPS scores 1.25 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilves 69%, TPS 56%. Over 2.5: Ilves 75%, TPS 50%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

TPS has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.44. Ilves: 11.8 shots per match, TPS: 11.7.

Match halves

Ilves: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88. TPS: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Ilves: 16-30 (6 goals). TPS: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Ilves appears to be the favorite: at home they score on average 1.25 goals per match and have a 50% home win rate, while TPS averages 1.00 goal away and has not recorded an away win yet (0%). In the last 5 matches Ilves scored 9 goals (1.8 per game) and won 3 of 5, whereas TPS scored 5 goals (1.0 per game) and averages 1.2 points per match, indicating a home advantage in form and efficiency. Both teams concede on average 1.5 goals per match, but Ilves has an xG against at home of 1.25 versus TPS’s away xG against of 1.35, and Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 50% of home matches compared to 0% for TPS away. TPS creates more chances (on average 11 shots and 3.5 on target away) and has xG for 1.36, yet their shot conversion is only 9%, while Ilves averages 8 shots and 3 on target with a higher conversion of 16%, translating into better chance conversion. Considering Ilves’s superior conversion (16%), the absence of away clean sheets for TPS (0%), and Ilves’s 9 goals in the last 5 matches versus TPS’s 5, I forecast a home win; estimated probabilities: Ilves 60%, draw 25%, TPS 15%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
IlvesTPS
9Shots14
IlvesTPS
4Shots on target4
IlvesTPS
1.14xG1.55
IlvesTPS
3Corners4
IlvesTPS
40Dangerous attacks54
IlvesTPS
11Fouls12
IlvesTPS
1Cards3
IlvesTPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.75Goals scored / match1.25
IlvesTPS
1.88Goals conceded / match1.19
IlvesTPS
49%Average possession47%
IlvesTPS
4.94Shots on target / match4.38
IlvesTPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.75Shots per match11.69
IlvesTPS
4.94Shots on target4.38
IlvesTPS
14.9%Shot conversion10.7%
IlvesTPS
49%Possession47%
IlvesTPS
1.44xG for1.45
IlvesTPS
1.63xG against1.59
IlvesTPS

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingTPS: Balanced
IlvesTPS
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilves
WLDLW
Season result split
31% W25% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-7
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.14Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
TPS
DWLWL
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Ilves · 1.25 goals / match - TPS

TPS is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.88 goals / match - Ilves · 1.19 goals / match - TPS

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

28Goals scored (season)20
IlvesTPS
30Goals conceded (season)19
IlvesTPS
3.63Average goals in match2.44
IlvesTPS
14Goals scored (last 5)8
IlvesTPS
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
IlvesTPS

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal81%
IlvesTPS
50%2 goals31%
IlvesTPS
19%3 goals13%
IlvesTPS
6%4 goals0%
IlvesTPS

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal69%
IlvesTPS
63%2 goals38%
IlvesTPS
31%3 goals13%
IlvesTPS
13%4 goals0%
IlvesTPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time25%
IlvesTPS
13%BTTS in both halves6%
IlvesTPS
38%Scored in both halves25%
IlvesTPS

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
IlvesTPS
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
IlvesTPS
80%BTTS - last 560%
IlvesTPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
IlvesTPS
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
IlvesTPS
38%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
IlvesTPS

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
IlvesTPS
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
IlvesTPS
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
IlvesTPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Ilves · 1 pts / match - TPS

Ilves - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing
TPS - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1
IlvesTPS
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.56
IlvesTPS
1.19Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
IlvesTPS
2.06Average goals (1st half)1.19
IlvesTPS
44%Clean sheet before half-time56%
IlvesTPS
38%No goal before half-time56%
IlvesTPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per match (2nd half)1.38
IlvesTPS
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
IlvesTPS
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
IlvesTPS
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.25
IlvesTPS
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
IlvesTPS
31%No goal after half-time38%
IlvesTPS

Ilves - second-half results

44% W31% R25% P
22
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TPS - second-half results

31% W44% R25% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaTPS
Average goals in match 3.632.67 2.44
Both teams scored 69%51% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%47% 50%
Clean sheets 25%28% 31%
Goal before half-time 88%75% 63%
Goal after half-time 94%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ilves 1 - 0 - 0 TPS. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs TPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 1:0 TPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs TPS?

Ilves score 1.75 goals per game on average and TPS 1.25. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Ilves's matches and 56% of TPS's.

What form are Ilves and TPS in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and TPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs TPS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ilves vs TPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.