Japan - J2 LeagueYume StadiumData current as of 12 September 2026

Imabari vs Sagan Tosu: match statistics

Imabari crest
Imabari
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Sagan Tosu crest
Sagan Tosu

Imabari vs Sagan Tosu: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Imabari played Sagan Tosu in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Yume Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Imabari: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Sagan Tosu: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Imabari scores 0.80 and concedes 2.60 goals per match. Sagan Tosu scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Imabari 60%, Sagan Tosu 40%. Over 2.5: Imabari 80%, Sagan Tosu 40%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Sagan Tosu has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.27. Imabari: 12.4 shots per match, Sagan Tosu: 14.8.

Match halves

Imabari: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Sagan Tosu: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Imabari: 0-15 (1 goals). Sagan Tosu: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sagan Tosu sit 9th, while Imabari are 20th, and the teams’ last five-match records clearly favor the visitors: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat compared with the hosts’ 1 win, 1 draw and 3 defeats. The visitors have scored 11 goals during this period, almost twice as many as Imabari’s 6, while conceding just 5 goals across the season compared with 13 for their opponents. Imabari have lost every home match, concede an average of 3 goals per game and have yet to keep a clean sheet. Sagan Tosu also create better chances, averaging 1.82 xG away from home compared with Imabari’s 1.39 xG at home, while allowing opponents just 1.23 xG against 1.55 conceded by the hosts. The risk of a draw is increased by Sagan Tosu’s two away draws so far; however, their superior form, defensive record and chance-creation quality point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data slightly supports BTTS - No: Imabari had both teams score in only 33% of matches, while Sagan Tosu recorded this outcome in 50%, compared with the league average of 44%. The hosts kept a clean sheet in 67% of their matches, while the visitors did so in 50%, increasing the likelihood that at least one team will fail to score. Imabari averages 1.67 goals scored, but Sagan Tosu concedes only 1.00 per match and allows opponents an xG of 1.23. The last five matches have been more open, with both teams recording BTTS in 60% of games and Imabari conceding an average of 2.2 goals; however, their attacking xG has dropped to 1.13. Sagan Tosu are in good scoring form, averaging 2.2 goals across their last five appearances, but the more likely scenario remains one in which the result is decided not by both teams scoring, but by only one of them finding the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match odds point to at least two goals, as Over 2.5 goals has landed in as many as 80% of the last five matches involving both teams. During this period, Imabari conceded an average of 2.2 goals per game, while Sagan Tosu scored 2.2 goals, clearly strengthening the visitors’ attacking potential. The quality of chances created also favors goals: Sagan Tosu’s average xG stands at 1.82, while Imabari allows opponents 1.63 xG. The hosts generate an average of 1.65 xG, so despite Sagan Tosu conceding just 1.0 goal on average, Imabari also has a realistic chance of scoring. The projected total of 2.90 goals gives the strongest betting edge to Over 1.5, which also covers the common scenario of exactly two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sagan Tosu win at full-time, as the visitors were level after 45 minutes in 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 of Imabari’s last 5. After the break, Sagan Tosu have recently averaged 1.4 goals, while Imabari have conceded as many as 1.8 goals per match in this period. Current form also clearly favours the visitors: they have averaged 2.2 goals and won 60% of their last 5 matches, compared with Imabari’s 1.2 goals, just 20% wins and 60% defeats. The hosts do have a better full-season home record, averaging 1.67 goals scored, but their defence has conceded 2.2 goals per match across their last five appearances. An initially cautious approach is likely, but Sagan Tosu’s attacking advantage in the second half gives the X/2 HT/FT outcome the greatest chance.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
ImabariSagan Tosu
8Shots15
ImabariSagan Tosu
2Shots on target2
ImabariSagan Tosu
0.89xG1.43
ImabariSagan Tosu
5Corners4
ImabariSagan Tosu
34Dangerous attacks48
ImabariSagan Tosu
7Fouls10
ImabariSagan Tosu
1Cards2
ImabariSagan Tosu

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.8Goals scored / match1.4
ImabariSagan Tosu
2.6Goals conceded / match1
ImabariSagan Tosu
51%Average possession51%
ImabariSagan Tosu
2.8Shots on target / match5.4
ImabariSagan Tosu

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.4Shots per match14.8
ImabariSagan Tosu
2.8Shots on target5.4
ImabariSagan Tosu
6.5%Shot conversion9.5%
ImabariSagan Tosu
51%Possession51%
ImabariSagan Tosu
1.27xG for1.72
ImabariSagan Tosu
1.58xG against1.47
ImabariSagan Tosu

Shooting quality

Imabari: BalancedSagan Tosu: Attacking
ImabariSagan Tosu
Accuracy (shots on target)23%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sagan Tosu is 700% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Imabari · 1.6 pts / match - Sagan Tosu

Imabari
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W20% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Sagan Tosu
WDLDW
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sagan Tosu is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - Imabari · 1.4 goals / match - Sagan Tosu

Sagan Tosu is 160% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.6 goals / match - Imabari · 1 goals / match - Sagan Tosu

Imabari scoring profile: mixed

Imabari scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Sagan Tosu keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

Sagan Tosu scoring profile: very strong

Sagan Tosu scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Imabari keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

4Goals scored (season)7
ImabariSagan Tosu
13Goals conceded (season)5
ImabariSagan Tosu
3.4Average goals in match2.4
ImabariSagan Tosu
4Goals scored (last 5)7
ImabariSagan Tosu
13Goals conceded (last 5)5
ImabariSagan Tosu

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal80%
ImabariSagan Tosu
20%2 goals60%
ImabariSagan Tosu
0%3 goals0%
ImabariSagan Tosu
0%4 goals0%
ImabariSagan Tosu

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal40%
ImabariSagan Tosu
80%2 goals40%
ImabariSagan Tosu
60%3 goals20%
ImabariSagan Tosu
20%4 goals0%
ImabariSagan Tosu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
ImabariSagan Tosu
20%BTTS in both halves20%
ImabariSagan Tosu
20%Scored in both halves40%
ImabariSagan Tosu

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
ImabariSagan Tosu
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ImabariSagan Tosu
60%BTTS - last 540%
ImabariSagan Tosu

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
ImabariSagan Tosu
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
ImabariSagan Tosu
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ImabariSagan Tosu

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
ImabariSagan Tosu
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
ImabariSagan Tosu
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
ImabariSagan Tosu

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sagan Tosu is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Imabari · 1.8 pts / match - Sagan Tosu

Imabari - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Sagan Tosu - half-time state
40% leading60% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.8
ImabariSagan Tosu
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.6
ImabariSagan Tosu
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
ImabariSagan Tosu
1Average goals (1st half)0.8
ImabariSagan Tosu
60%Clean sheet before half-time80%
ImabariSagan Tosu
60%No goal before half-time40%
ImabariSagan Tosu

After half-time (2nd half)

0.2Points per match (2nd half)1.6
ImabariSagan Tosu
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
ImabariSagan Tosu
2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
ImabariSagan Tosu
2.4Average goals (2nd half)1.6
ImabariSagan Tosu
0%Clean sheet after half-time60%
ImabariSagan Tosu
60%No goal after half-time40%
ImabariSagan Tosu

Imabari - second-half results

0% W20% D80% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.4

Concedes 1.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sagan Tosu - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Imabari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sagan Tosu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Imabari
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Sagan Tosu
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Imabari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
51%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
243%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Sagan Tosu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

ImabariLigaSagan Tosu
Average goals in match 3.402.63 2.40
Both teams scored 60%43% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%48% 40%
Clean sheets 0%34% 60%
Goal before half-time 60%69% 60%
Goal after half-time 100%78% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+46%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sagan TosuYellow cardShivatafari Nagasawa
  2. Sagan TosuSubstitutionOn: Hikaru NakaharaOff: Rio Hyon
  3. ImabariYellow cardGabriel Gomes Ferreira
  4. Sagan TosuYellow cardNagi Matsumoto
  5. ImabariSubstitutionOn: Kyota MochiiOff: Yoshiaki Komai
  6. Sagan TosuSubstitutionOn: Kanta JojoOff: Ryo Shiohama
  7. ImabariGoalKota MoriAssist: Rei Umeki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Imabari 1 - 1 - 0 Sagan Tosu. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Imabari
1 : 1
Sagan Tosu
Sagan Tosu
1 : 4
FC Imabari

FAQ

What was the result of Imabari vs Sagan Tosu?

The J2 League match finished Imabari 1:0 Sagan Tosu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Imabari and Sagan Tosu?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Imabari won 1, Sagan Tosu won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Imabari vs Sagan Tosu?

Imabari score 0.80 goals per game on average and Sagan Tosu 1.40. The J2 League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Imabari's matches and 40% of Sagan Tosu's.

What form are Imabari and Sagan Tosu in?

Over the last 5 games Imabari have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Sagan Tosu 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Imabari vs Sagan Tosu?

The statistical background for Imabari vs Sagan Tosu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.