El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 15 October 2026

INCA-Aruba vs Firpo: match statistics

INCA-Aruba crest
INCA-Aruba
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Firpo crest
Firpo

INCA-Aruba vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

INCA-Aruba played Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

INCA-Aruba: 0-0-4, 0.00 points/match. Firpo: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

INCA-Aruba scores 0.25 and concedes 2.75 goals per match. Firpo scores 2.33 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: INCA-Aruba 25%, Firpo 33%. Over 2.5: INCA-Aruba 50%, Firpo 33%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 2.15 vs 1.47. INCA-Aruba: 10.0 shots per match, Firpo: 14.0.

Match halves

INCA-Aruba: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.25. Firpo: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

INCA-Aruba: 61-75 (1 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

INCA-Aruba have lost all 4 matches played so far, scoring just 1 goal and conceding as many as 11, which clearly highlights major problems at both ends of the pitch. At home, the hosts average only 0.5 goals scored and 3.5 conceded, have yet to keep a clean sheet, and have failed to score in 50% of their matches. Firpo remain unbeaten this season with 2 wins and 1 draw, alongside a 7:1 goal difference, while away from home they allow opponents an average xG of just 1.00. The visitors are also creating higher-quality chances, recording an away xG of 1.65 compared with the hosts’ 1.36, while enjoying greater possession: 51% to 41%. The extent of INCA-Aruba’s defensive weaknesses should allow Firpo to take control of the match and secure the win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is INCA-Aruba’s very poor recent scoring record: the team has averaged just 0.25 goals per match, while both teams scored in only 25% of its recent fixtures. Firpo have conceded just 0.8 goals per match over this period, whereas INCA-Aruba have managed an average of only 1 goal across their last five appearances. The visitors have the potential to score themselves, as they average 1.6 goals, while the hosts concede as many as 2.75 goals per match. However, BTTS has occurred in only 40% of Firpo’s recent matches, and their more solid defence increases the likelihood of the hosts keeping a clean sheet. A scenario in which Firpo score and INCA-Aruba fail to find the net is therefore more likely than both sides scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as this line has been surpassed in 100% of the teams’ previous matches. Firpo have averaged 1.6 goals scored in their last five fixtures, with a high average xG of 2.08, while INCA-Aruba have conceded as many as 2.75 goals per game during this period. The hosts are significantly weaker in attack, averaging just 0.25 goals scored in their last five appearances, but their xG of 1.47 indicates a realistic chance of contributing to the scoreline. At the same time, Firpo concede an average of 0.8 goals, so the projected total of 2.70 goals favors going over two goals, but does not provide an equally clear edge for Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal comes from current form: INCA-Aruba have lost all four of their last matches, scoring an average of just 0.25 goals and conceding 2.75, while Firpo average 1.6 goals scored. The hosts were trailing at half-time in 75% of those matches and failed to score before the break, whereas Firpo were leading after 45 minutes in 40% of their games, conceding just 0.2 goals per match during that phase. The visitors’ advantage is also evident after the break: Firpo score an average of 1.0 goal and concede 0.6, while INCA-Aruba score only 0.25 and allow their opponents 1.75 goals. Although INCA-Aruba’s previous home data is very strong, it is based on just two matches; therefore, the more reliable current form points to Firpo leading at the break and securing the final win in the HT/FT market: X/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
INCA-ArubaFirpo
11Shots12
INCA-ArubaFirpo
4Shots on target6
INCA-ArubaFirpo
1.31xG1.52
INCA-ArubaFirpo
5Corners8
INCA-ArubaFirpo
47Dangerous attacks48
INCA-ArubaFirpo
14Fouls22
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0Cards0
INCA-ArubaFirpo

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.25Goals scored / match2.33
INCA-ArubaFirpo
2.75Goals conceded / match0.33
INCA-ArubaFirpo
41%Average possession53%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
4.75Shots on target / match8.67
INCA-ArubaFirpo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match14
INCA-ArubaFirpo
4.75Shots on target8.67
INCA-ArubaFirpo
2.5%Shot conversion16.7%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
41%Possession53%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
1.47xG for2.15
INCA-ArubaFirpo
2.06xG against1.21
INCA-ArubaFirpo

Shooting quality

INCA-Aruba: BalancedFirpo: Attacking
INCA-ArubaFirpo
Accuracy (shots on target)48%62%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.050.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

INCA-Aruba
LLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 2.06BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 50%
Firpo
DWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 2.15Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 832% better for: goals scored per match.

0.25 goals / match - INCA-Aruba · 2.33 goals / match - Firpo

Firpo is 733% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.75 goals / match - INCA-Aruba · 0.33 goals / match - Firpo

INCA-Aruba scoring profile: more difficult

INCA-Aruba scores in 25% of matches (1 of 4 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while INCA-Aruba keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

1Goals scored (season)7
INCA-ArubaFirpo
11Goals conceded (season)1
INCA-ArubaFirpo
3Average goals in match2.67
INCA-ArubaFirpo
1Goals scored (last 5)7
INCA-ArubaFirpo
11Goals conceded (last 5)1
INCA-ArubaFirpo

How often they score at least...

25%1 goal100%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0%2 goals67%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0%3 goals33%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0%4 goals33%
INCA-ArubaFirpo

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal33%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
100%2 goals0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
50%3 goals0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
25%4 goals0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0%BTTS in both halves0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0%Scored in both halves67%
INCA-ArubaFirpo

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
25%BTTS - last 533%
INCA-ArubaFirpo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 832% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.25 pts / match - INCA-Aruba · 2.33 pts / match - Firpo

INCA-Aruba - half-time state
0% leading25% draw75% trailing
Firpo - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.25Points per match (1st half)2.33
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0Goals scored (1st half)1
INCA-ArubaFirpo
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
INCA-ArubaFirpo
1Average goals (1st half)1
INCA-ArubaFirpo
25%Clean sheet before half-time100%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
100%No goal before half-time33%
INCA-ArubaFirpo

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)2.33
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
INCA-ArubaFirpo
1.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
INCA-ArubaFirpo
2Average goals (2nd half)1.67
INCA-ArubaFirpo
0%Clean sheet after half-time67%
INCA-ArubaFirpo
75%No goal after half-time0%
INCA-ArubaFirpo

INCA-Aruba - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.25
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Firpo - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

INCA-Aruba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.250.00
Goals scored / match0.00.3
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal75%100%
2 goals25%75%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet25%0%
No goal100%75%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 25% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.332.33
Goals scored / match1.01.3
Goals conceded / match0.00.3
Average goals in match1.01.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal33%0%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

INCA-Aruba
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.3 : 2.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

INCA-Aruba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.69
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
18%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
255%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.94
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.88
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
216%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
23%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

INCA-ArubaLigaFirpo
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.50▲ 2.67
Both teams scored▼ 25%46%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%38%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 0%37%▲ 67%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%65%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%62%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of INCA-Aruba vs Firpo?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished INCA-Aruba 0:0 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before INCA-Aruba vs Firpo?

INCA-Aruba score 0.25 goals per game on average and Firpo 2.33. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 25% of INCA-Aruba's matches and 33% of Firpo's.

What form are INCA-Aruba and Firpo in?

Over the last 5 games INCA-Aruba have a 0-0-4 record (0.00 points per game) and Firpo 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for INCA-Aruba vs Firpo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.