Italy - Serie C Group AData current as of 11 September 2026

Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: match statistics

Inter II crest
Inter II
0 : 1half-time 0:0
AlbinoLeffe crest
AlbinoLeffe
130%(1.95)
X40%(3.35)
230%(3.60)

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced rivalry with a lean towards a draw. Inter II presents poor form in home matches with 57% draws and just 14% wins, recording four draws in their last five meetings. AlbinoLeffe also has a high tendency to draw on the road (50%) but has better overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG). The hosts have a slight advantage in expected goals (xG 1.62 vs 1.17), yet a low conversion rate (6% vs 12% for the visitors). Both teams show a similar percentage of clean sheets (36%), suggesting a defensive balance. Taking into account the hosts' poor form in recent matches and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most likely result is a share of the points.

Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter II played AlbinoLeffe in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match was played on 7 March 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Inter II: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. AlbinoLeffe: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter II scores 1.13 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. AlbinoLeffe scores 1.30 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter II 57%, AlbinoLeffe 60%. Over 2.5: Inter II 37%, AlbinoLeffe 53%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Inter II has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.33. Inter II: 11.8 shots per match, AlbinoLeffe: 10.2.

Match halves

Inter II: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.47. AlbinoLeffe: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Inter II: 16-30 (8 goals). AlbinoLeffe: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group A: 2.28 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced rivalry with a lean towards a draw. Inter II presents poor form in home matches with 57% draws and just 14% wins, recording four draws in their last five meetings. AlbinoLeffe also has a high tendency to draw on the road (50%) but has better overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG). The hosts have a slight advantage in expected goals (xG 1.62 vs 1.17), yet a low conversion rate (6% vs 12% for the visitors). Both teams show a similar percentage of clean sheets (36%), suggesting a defensive balance. Taking into account the hosts' poor form in recent matches and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most likely result is a share of the points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
13Shots8
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
4Shots on target5
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.61xG1.2
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
6Corners4
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
70Dangerous attacks47
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
16Fouls4
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
2Cards3
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.13Goals scored / match1.3
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.03Goals conceded / match1.37
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
48%Average possession53%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3.8Shots on target / match3.47
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.77Shots per match10.23
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3.8Shots on target3.47
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
9.6%Shot conversion12.7%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
48%Possession53%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.46xG for1.33
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.35xG against1.4
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Shooting quality

Inter II: BalancedAlbinoLeffe: Balanced
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AlbinoLeffe is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Inter II · 1.6 pts / match - AlbinoLeffe

Inter II
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W40% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-8
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-8-4
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
AlbinoLeffe
DWDLW
Season result split
30% W33% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-11
1.23 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-7-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AlbinoLeffe is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Inter II · 1.3 goals / match - AlbinoLeffe

Inter II is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Inter II · 1.37 goals / match - AlbinoLeffe

Inter II scoring profile: very strong

Inter II scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while AlbinoLeffe keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

AlbinoLeffe scoring profile: very strong

AlbinoLeffe scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Inter II keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

34Goals scored (season)39
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
31Goals conceded (season)41
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
2.17Average goals in match2.67
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal77%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
37%2 goals43%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%3 goals10%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0%4 goals0%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal73%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
23%2 goals43%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%3 goals13%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%4 goals3%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
20%Scored in both halves23%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
60%BTTS - last 520%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter II is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Inter II · 1.17 pts / match - AlbinoLeffe

Inter II - half-time state
37% leading37% draw27% trailing
AlbinoLeffe - half-time state
27% leading37% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.17
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.13
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
63%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
47%No goal before half-time60%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.1
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.07Average goals (2nd half)1.53
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
50%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
60%No goal after half-time40%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Inter II - second-half results

27% W40% D33% L
44
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AlbinoLeffe - second-half results

23% W40% D37% L
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
AlbinoLeffe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter II
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
8
2
16-30
6
7
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

AlbinoLeffe
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
6
4
16-30
6
7
31-45
4
8
46-60
8
5
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

AlbinoLeffe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

Inter IILigaAlbinoLeffe
Average goals in match 2.172.28 2.67
Both teams scored 57%49% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%41% 53%
Clean sheets 27%30% 27%
Goal before half-time 73%66% 67%
Goal after half-time 73%72% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.28
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inter IIYellow cardMatteo Cocchi
  2. Inter IISubstitutionOn: Richi AgbonifoOff: Jamal Iddrissou
  3. Inter IISubstitutionOn: Gabriele Re CecconiOff: Simone Cinquegrano
  4. Inter IIYellow cardFrancesco Stante
  5. AlbinoLeffeGoalSamuele Parlati
  6. Inter IISubstitutionOn: Aymen ZouinOff: Gabriele Re Cecconi
  7. AlbinoLeffeYellow cardMattia Agostinelli
  8. AlbinoLeffeSubstitutionOn: Lorenzo SorrentinoOff: Giacomo Sali
  9. AlbinoLeffeRed cardGiacomo Sciacca
  10. AlbinoLeffeSubstitutionOn: Edoardo SottiniOff: Andrea De Paoli

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Inter II 1 - 0 - 0 AlbinoLeffe. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

AlbinoLeffe
1 : 3
Inter II

FAQ

What was the result of Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?

The Serie C Group A match finished Inter II 0:1 AlbinoLeffe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?

Inter II score 1.13 goals per game on average and AlbinoLeffe 1.30. The Serie C Group A average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Inter II's matches and 60% of AlbinoLeffe's.

What form are Inter II and AlbinoLeffe in?

Over the last 5 games Inter II have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and AlbinoLeffe 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.