Italy - Serie C Group AData current as of 23 July 2026

Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: match statistics

Inter II crest
Inter II
0 : 1half-time 0:0
AlbinoLeffe crest
AlbinoLeffe
130%(1.95)
X40%(3.35)
230%(3.60)

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced rivalry with a lean towards a draw. Inter II presents poor form in home matches with 57% draws and just 14% wins, recording four draws in their last five meetings. AlbinoLeffe also has a high tendency to draw on the road (50%) but has better overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG). The hosts have a slight advantage in expected goals (xG 1.62 vs 1.17), yet a low conversion rate (6% vs 12% for the visitors). Both teams show a similar percentage of clean sheets (36%), suggesting a defensive balance. Taking into account the hosts' poor form in recent matches and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most likely result is a share of the points.

Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter II play AlbinoLeffe in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Inter II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. AlbinoLeffe: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter II scores 1.05 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. AlbinoLeffe scores 1.34 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter II 53%, AlbinoLeffe 55%. Over 2.5: Inter II 37%, AlbinoLeffe 55%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Inter II has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.35. Inter II: 12.4 shots per match, AlbinoLeffe: 10.3.

Match halves

Inter II: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.45. AlbinoLeffe: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Inter II: 0-15 (8 goals). AlbinoLeffe: 61-75 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group A: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced rivalry with a lean towards a draw. Inter II presents poor form in home matches with 57% draws and just 14% wins, recording four draws in their last five meetings. AlbinoLeffe also has a high tendency to draw on the road (50%) but has better overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG). The hosts have a slight advantage in expected goals (xG 1.62 vs 1.17), yet a low conversion rate (6% vs 12% for the visitors). Both teams show a similar percentage of clean sheets (36%), suggesting a defensive balance. Taking into account the hosts' poor form in recent matches and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most likely result is a share of the points.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
13Shots8
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
4Shots on target5
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.61xG1.2
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
6Corners4
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
70Dangerous attacks47
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
16Fouls4
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
2Cards3
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.05Goals scored / match1.34
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.08Goals conceded / match1.29
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
48%Average possession53%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3.95Shots on target / match3.58
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.42Shots per match10.26
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3.95Shots on target3.58
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
8.5%Shot conversion13.1%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
48%Possession53%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.52xG for1.35
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.39xG against1.4
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Shooting quality

Inter II: BalancedAlbinoLeffe: Efficient finishing
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
Accuracy (shots on target)32%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AlbinoLeffe is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Inter II · 1.4 pts / match - AlbinoLeffe

Inter II
WWLLL
Season result split
32% W32% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-12-14
1.26 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-8
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
AlbinoLeffe
DWLWL
Season result split
34% W29% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-14
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-8-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AlbinoLeffe is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - Inter II · 1.34 goals / match - AlbinoLeffe

Inter II is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.08 goals / match - Inter II · 1.29 goals / match - AlbinoLeffe

Inter II scoring profile: strong

Inter II scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while AlbinoLeffe keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

AlbinoLeffe scoring profile: very strong

AlbinoLeffe scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Inter II keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

40Goals scored (season)51
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
41Goals conceded (season)49
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
2.13Average goals in match2.63
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal76%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
34%2 goals42%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%3 goals16%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0%4 goals0%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal71%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
26%2 goals39%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%3 goals13%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%4 goals3%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time16%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
18%Scored in both halves24%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
20%BTTS - last 540%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter II is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Inter II · 1.18 pts / match - AlbinoLeffe

Inter II - half-time state
34% leading37% draw29% trailing
AlbinoLeffe - half-time state
26% leading39% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)1.18
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.05
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
63%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
53%No goal before half-time63%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
0.66Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.58
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
42%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe
61%No goal after half-time37%
Inter IIAlbinoLeffe

Inter II - second-half results

21% W42% R37% P
53
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding94%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AlbinoLeffe - second-half results

29% W39% R32% P
45
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
AlbinoLeffe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.42.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter II
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
8
3
16-30
7
9
31-45
5
4
46-60
5
11
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

AlbinoLeffe
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
8
31-45
4
11
46-60
13
5
61-75
13
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+68%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

AlbinoLeffe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

Inter IILigaAlbinoLeffe
Average goals in match 2.132.34 2.63
Both teams scored 53%50% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%43% 55%
Clean sheets 24%30% 29%
Goal before half-time 71%66% 63%
Goal after half-time 76%73% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Inter II 1 - 0 - 0 AlbinoLeffe. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

AlbinoLeffe
1 : 3
Inter II

FAQ

What was the result of Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?

The Serie C Group A match finished Inter II 0:1 AlbinoLeffe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?

Inter II score 1.05 goals per game on average and AlbinoLeffe 1.34. The Serie C Group A average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Inter II's matches and 55% of AlbinoLeffe's.

What form are Inter II and AlbinoLeffe in?

Over the last 5 games Inter II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and AlbinoLeffe 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.