Italy - Serie C Group CData current as of 28 October 2026

Inter II vs Scafatese: match statistics

Inter II crest
Inter II
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Scafatese crest
Scafatese

Inter II vs Scafatese: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter II played Scafatese in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 27 October 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Inter II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Scafatese: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter II scores 1.90 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Scafatese scores 1.60 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter II 80%, Scafatese 60%. Over 2.5: Inter II 70%, Scafatese 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Inter II has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.42. Inter II: 14.9 shots per match, Scafatese: 11.7.

Match halves

Inter II: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.40. Scafatese: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Inter II: 76-90+ (8 goals). Scafatese: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group C: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter II have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 12 goals, but have also conceded 8, showing that their attacking efficiency is not matched by defensive consistency. At home, the hosts average 2 goals scored but concede 2.5 per match and have yet to keep a clean sheet. Scafatese are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, although 3 ended in draws; away from home, 80% of their matches have been drawn. Both teams average 2 goals in their respective home and away fixtures, and their xG figures are similar: 1.66 for Inter II and 1.59 for Scafatese. The comparable quality of chances created, combined with the visitors’ tendency to draw away from home, points to the points being shared, despite the hosts having scored more goals recently.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams scored at both ends in 60% of their last five matches, which supports a BTTS - Yes pick. Inter II averaged 2.4 goals scored during this period, while Scafatese conceded 1.0 per game; additionally, the visitors have conceded an average of 1.8 goals away from home and are yet to keep a clean sheet. Scafatese average 2.0 goals scored away, while Inter II have conceded an average of 1.6 across their last five matches, making an away goal a realistic prospect as well. Caution is warranted, however, as Inter II failed to score in 50% of their home matches, and just 25% of their home games have seen both teams score. Despite this, the hosts’ improved attacking form and Scafatese’s away results suggest that both teams are more likely to score than for either side to be held scoreless.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 100% of Scafatese matches and 75% of Inter II matches. The visitors score an average of 2.0 goals but concede 1.8, giving both teams a chance to find the net. In their last 5 matches, Inter II averaged 2.4 goals scored, and at least three goals were scored in 80% of their games. Even so, Over 2.5 goals is less reliable, having landed in only 25% of Inter II's matches so far; therefore, the safer 1.5-goal line offers a clearer edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is Scafatese leading at the break: the visitors have done so in 3 of their 5 matches so far and in 3 of their last 5, while Inter II were trailing at half-time in 2 of their last 5 games. Their strong starts are also supported by recent first-half form: Scafatese averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.2 conceded, compared with 0.6 scored and 0.8 conceded for Inter II. However, holding on to the lead is far from certain, as 4 of the visitors’ 5 matches ended in a draw, even though they were leading at half-time in 3 of them. Inter II have grounds to turn the game around: they averaged 1.8 goals after the break across their last 5 matches, while Scafatese conceded 0.8 in that period. Therefore, an away lead at half-time followed by a draw at full-time is the most likely single scenario, although Scafatese’s average of 1.4 goals after the break over the full period analysed keeps a win for them in contention.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
Inter IIScafatese
13Shots10
Inter IIScafatese
5Shots on target4
Inter IIScafatese
1.71xG1.5
Inter IIScafatese
3Corners6
Inter IIScafatese
75Dangerous attacks82
Inter IIScafatese
7Fouls6
Inter IIScafatese
1Cards3
Inter IIScafatese

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.9Goals scored / match1.6
Inter IIScafatese
1.8Goals conceded / match1.3
Inter IIScafatese
48%Average possession50%
Inter IIScafatese
5.5Shots on target / match4.1
Inter IIScafatese

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.9Shots per match11.7
Inter IIScafatese
5.5Shots on target4.1
Inter IIScafatese
12.8%Shot conversion13.7%
Inter IIScafatese
48%Possession50%
Inter IIScafatese
1.82xG for1.42
Inter IIScafatese
1.45xG against1.58
Inter IIScafatese

Shooting quality

Inter II: AttackingScafatese: Efficient finishing
Inter IIScafatese
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Scafatese is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Inter II · 2.2 pts / match - Scafatese

Inter II
WLWLD
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-4
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.04Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Scafatese
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W50% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-1
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-0
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter II is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.9 goals / match - Inter II · 1.6 goals / match - Scafatese

Scafatese is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - Inter II · 1.3 goals / match - Scafatese

Inter II scoring profile: very strong

Inter II scores in 100% of matches (10 of 10 matches), while Scafatese keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Scafatese scoring profile: very strong

Scafatese scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Inter II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

19Goals scored (season)16
Inter IIScafatese
18Goals conceded (season)13
Inter IIScafatese
3.7Average goals in match2.9
Inter IIScafatese
11Goals scored (last 5)9
Inter IIScafatese
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Inter IIScafatese

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal80%
Inter IIScafatese
60%2 goals60%
Inter IIScafatese
20%3 goals20%
Inter IIScafatese
10%4 goals0%
Inter IIScafatese

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal70%
Inter IIScafatese
50%2 goals50%
Inter IIScafatese
30%3 goals10%
Inter IIScafatese
20%4 goals0%
Inter IIScafatese

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
Inter IIScafatese
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Inter IIScafatese
20%Scored in both halves40%
Inter IIScafatese

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Inter IIScafatese
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Inter IIScafatese
80%BTTS - last 560%
Inter IIScafatese

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
Inter IIScafatese
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
Inter IIScafatese
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Inter IIScafatese

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Inter IIScafatese
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Inter IIScafatese
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Inter IIScafatese

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Scafatese is 111% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - Inter II · 1.9 pts / match - Scafatese

Inter II - half-time state
20% leading30% draw50% trailing
Scafatese - half-time state
60% leading10% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.9
Inter IIScafatese
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.8
Inter IIScafatese
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
Inter IIScafatese
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.1
Inter IIScafatese
40%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Inter IIScafatese
70%No goal before half-time40%
Inter IIScafatese

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Inter IIScafatese
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Inter IIScafatese
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Inter IIScafatese
2.4Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Inter IIScafatese
30%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Inter IIScafatese
10%No goal after half-time40%
Inter IIScafatese

Inter II - second-half results

30% W40% D30% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Scafatese - second-half results

30% W30% D40% L
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.42.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Scafatese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.40
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter II
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Scafatese
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
3
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

Scafatese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

Inter IILigaScafatese
Average goals in match▲ 3.702.83• 2.90
Both teams scored▲ 80%53%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 70%52%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 20%28%▲ 30%
Goal before half-time▼ 70%72%▲ 90%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%75%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inter IISubstitutionOn: Jan ŻuberekOff: Jamal Iddrissou
  2. ScafateseSubstitutionOn: Emmanuele De ChiaraOff: Alessio Esposito
  3. ScafateseYellow cardLoris Bacchetti
  4. ScafateseYellow cardLoris Bacchetti
  5. Inter IIGoalMattia Marello
  6. ScafateseSubstitutionOn: Pasqualino OrtisiOff: Ciro Palmieri
  7. ScafateseYellow cardMichele Emmausso

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Inter II vs Scafatese?

The Serie C Group C match finished Inter II 2:1 Scafatese. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter II vs Scafatese?

Inter II score 1.90 goals per game on average and Scafatese 1.60. The Serie C Group C average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Inter II's matches and 60% of Scafatese's.

What form are Inter II and Scafatese in?

Over the last 5 games Inter II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Scafatese 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter II vs Scafatese?

The statistical background for Inter II vs Scafatese — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.