Inter Miami II vs Toronto II: match statistics
Inter Miami II vs Toronto II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Inter Miami II played Toronto II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Venue: Chase Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Inter Miami II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Toronto II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Inter Miami II scores 0.82 and concedes 2.65 goals per match. Toronto II scores 1.58 and concedes 1.89. League average: 3.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Inter Miami II 59%, Toronto II 58%. Over 2.5: Inter Miami II 65%, Toronto II 74%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Inter Miami II has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.27. Inter Miami II: 11.6 shots per match, Toronto II: 10.1.
Match halves
Inter Miami II: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.41. Toronto II: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.84.
Goals by minute
Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). Toronto II: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Inter Miami II have yet to win at home (0 wins, 4 draws, 12 losses), averaging only 0.83 goals scored and conceding 2.33 goals per match. Toronto II have recorded 7 wins and 30 goals this season; away they average 1.3 goals with a shot conversion of 13% versus the hosts' 8%, giving the visitors an edge in efficiency. Although the hosts' xG at this ground is 1.31 compared to the visitors' xG of 1.23, Inter fail to convert chances (0.83 actual goals), and in the last 5 matches Toronto scored 6 goals versus Inter’s 2. Both teams are defensively vulnerable (Inter concede 2.33 goals at home, Toronto 2.0 away), and the average total goals is 3.17 for hosts and 3.3 for visitors, so I expect an open game with goals. Considering Inter’s 0 home wins, Toronto’s superior finishing and higher average points in the last 5 matches (Toronto 0.6 vs Inter 0.2), I give the advantage to the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Inter Miami II has a season BTTS rate of 89% versus Toronto II’s 30% and a league average of 61%, giving a strong home-side signal despite the teams’ discrepancy. Both sides concede frequently: Inter Miami have conceded 41 goals (1.78 per game) and scored 14, while Toronto have conceded 36 goals (2.00 per game) and scored 30, indicating vulnerable defenses. In the last 5 matches Inter Miami have scored only 2 goals (0.4 per game) with BTTS in 40%, while Toronto have scored 6 goals (1.2 per game) with BTTS in 60%, so the visitors show better short-term attacking form. Seasonal xG is 1.32 for the hosts and 1.23 for the visitors; hosts average 10.44 shots and 4.56 on target with a conversion rate of 18% (vs 9.8 shots, 4.4 on target and 13% for Toronto), which shows chance creation on both sides. Considering Inter Miami’s 89% BTTS, the high goals-conceded rates (1.78 and 2.00) and the league average of 3.22 goals per game, I tip BTTS - Yes; probability assessed at 65% Yes and 35% No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of approximately 2.94 goals (1.53 for Inter Miami II and 1.41 for Toronto II) based on xG: Inter has xG_for 1.32 versus the opponent’s xG_against 1.74, while Toronto has xG_for 1.23 versus Inter’s xG_against 1.59. Both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals this season: Inter 89% and Toronto 70%, therefore I give Over 1.5 a high probability (86%). Seasonal Over 2.5 figures are also significant (Inter 89%, Toronto 60%) and the league averages 3.22 goals per game, so Over 2.5 is likely (71%), although Inter have scored only 0.4 goals per game in their last 5 matches, which reduces confidence. The signal around 3.5 goals is weaker: seasonally 44%/60% for Inter/Toronto and the projected 2.94 goals lead me to slightly favor Under 3.5 (Over 47% vs Under 53%). In summary, the strongest and safest pick from these data is Over 1.5 due to the high seasonal rates 89%/70%, expected xG and the advantage in shots and conversion (10.44 vs 9.8 shots, conversion 18% vs 13%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Inter Miami II has a clear seasonal edge: they average 1.89 goals per match versus Toronto II’s 1.30, register higher xG (1.32 vs 1.23) and win 56% of home matches. Hosts show a strong start — averaging 1.22 goals by Half‑Time versus 0.30 for the visitors and leading at the break in 56% of games (5 instances). In the second half the home side scores on average 0.67 and concedes 1.33, yielding a -0.66 goal difference after Half‑Time and increasing the risk of a turnaround by the opponent; nevertheless the season-long full‑time goal balance is slightly in the hosts’ favor (+0.11). Therefore the most reliable signal is 1/1 with a probability of 36%, with 1/X (11%) and X/1 (13%) as alternatives given frequent equalizers and the hosts’ weaker second halves.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Inter Miami II | Toronto II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Toronto II is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Inter Miami II · 0.6 pts / match - Toronto II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Toronto II is 93% better for: goals scored per match.
0.82 goals / match - Inter Miami II · 1.58 goals / match - Toronto II
Toronto II is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.65 goals / match - Inter Miami II · 1.89 goals / match - Toronto II
Inter Miami II scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
Toronto II scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Inter Miami II
Over / Under - Toronto II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Toronto II is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.82 pts / match - Inter Miami II · 1.47 pts / match - Toronto II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Inter Miami II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Toronto II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Inter Miami II
Toronto II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Inter Miami II | Liga | Toronto II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.47 | 3.23 | ▲ 3.47 |
| Both teams scored | • 59% | 60% | ▼ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 65% | 65% | ▲ 74% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 22% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 75% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 84% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Inter Miami IIYellow cardLovens Junior Delinois
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Inter Miami II 0 - 0 - 2 Toronto II. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Inter Miami II vs Toronto II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Inter Miami II 2:1 Toronto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Inter Miami II and Toronto II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Inter Miami II won 0, Toronto II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Inter Miami II vs Toronto II?
Inter Miami II score 0.82 goals per game on average and Toronto II 1.58. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Inter Miami II's matches and 58% of Toronto II's.
What form are Inter Miami II and Toronto II in?
Over the last 5 games Inter Miami II have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Toronto II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Miami II vs Toronto II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


