United States - MLS Next ProChase StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Inter Miami II vs Toronto II: match statistics

Inter Miami II crest
Inter Miami II
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Toronto II crest
Toronto II

Inter Miami II vs Toronto II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter Miami II played Toronto II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Venue: Chase Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Inter Miami II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Toronto II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter Miami II scores 0.82 and concedes 2.65 goals per match. Toronto II scores 1.58 and concedes 1.89. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter Miami II 59%, Toronto II 58%. Over 2.5: Inter Miami II 65%, Toronto II 74%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Inter Miami II has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.27. Inter Miami II: 11.6 shots per match, Toronto II: 10.1.

Match halves

Inter Miami II: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.41. Toronto II: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.84.

Goals by minute

Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). Toronto II: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter Miami II have yet to win at home (0 wins, 4 draws, 12 losses), averaging only 0.83 goals scored and conceding 2.33 goals per match. Toronto II have recorded 7 wins and 30 goals this season; away they average 1.3 goals with a shot conversion of 13% versus the hosts' 8%, giving the visitors an edge in efficiency. Although the hosts' xG at this ground is 1.31 compared to the visitors' xG of 1.23, Inter fail to convert chances (0.83 actual goals), and in the last 5 matches Toronto scored 6 goals versus Inter’s 2. Both teams are defensively vulnerable (Inter concede 2.33 goals at home, Toronto 2.0 away), and the average total goals is 3.17 for hosts and 3.3 for visitors, so I expect an open game with goals. Considering Inter’s 0 home wins, Toronto’s superior finishing and higher average points in the last 5 matches (Toronto 0.6 vs Inter 0.2), I give the advantage to the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Inter Miami II has a season BTTS rate of 89% versus Toronto II’s 30% and a league average of 61%, giving a strong home-side signal despite the teams’ discrepancy. Both sides concede frequently: Inter Miami have conceded 41 goals (1.78 per game) and scored 14, while Toronto have conceded 36 goals (2.00 per game) and scored 30, indicating vulnerable defenses. In the last 5 matches Inter Miami have scored only 2 goals (0.4 per game) with BTTS in 40%, while Toronto have scored 6 goals (1.2 per game) with BTTS in 60%, so the visitors show better short-term attacking form. Seasonal xG is 1.32 for the hosts and 1.23 for the visitors; hosts average 10.44 shots and 4.56 on target with a conversion rate of 18% (vs 9.8 shots, 4.4 on target and 13% for Toronto), which shows chance creation on both sides. Considering Inter Miami’s 89% BTTS, the high goals-conceded rates (1.78 and 2.00) and the league average of 3.22 goals per game, I tip BTTS - Yes; probability assessed at 65% Yes and 35% No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project a total of approximately 2.94 goals (1.53 for Inter Miami II and 1.41 for Toronto II) based on xG: Inter has xG_for 1.32 versus the opponent’s xG_against 1.74, while Toronto has xG_for 1.23 versus Inter’s xG_against 1.59. Both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals this season: Inter 89% and Toronto 70%, therefore I give Over 1.5 a high probability (86%). Seasonal Over 2.5 figures are also significant (Inter 89%, Toronto 60%) and the league averages 3.22 goals per game, so Over 2.5 is likely (71%), although Inter have scored only 0.4 goals per game in their last 5 matches, which reduces confidence. The signal around 3.5 goals is weaker: seasonally 44%/60% for Inter/Toronto and the projected 2.94 goals lead me to slightly favor Under 3.5 (Over 47% vs Under 53%). In summary, the strongest and safest pick from these data is Over 1.5 due to the high seasonal rates 89%/70%, expected xG and the advantage in shots and conversion (10.44 vs 9.8 shots, conversion 18% vs 13%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Inter Miami II has a clear seasonal edge: they average 1.89 goals per match versus Toronto II’s 1.30, register higher xG (1.32 vs 1.23) and win 56% of home matches. Hosts show a strong start — averaging 1.22 goals by Half‑Time versus 0.30 for the visitors and leading at the break in 56% of games (5 instances). In the second half the home side scores on average 0.67 and concedes 1.33, yielding a -0.66 goal difference after Half‑Time and increasing the risk of a turnaround by the opponent; nevertheless the season-long full‑time goal balance is slightly in the hosts’ favor (+0.11). Therefore the most reliable signal is 1/1 with a probability of 36%, with 1/X (11%) and X/1 (13%) as alternatives given frequent equalizers and the hosts’ weaker second halves.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Inter Miami IIToronto II
9Shots9
Inter Miami IIToronto II
3Shots on target1
Inter Miami IIToronto II
1.05xG0.96
Inter Miami IIToronto II
1Corners4
Inter Miami IIToronto II
37Dangerous attacks44
Inter Miami IIToronto II
26Fouls14
Inter Miami IIToronto II
4Cards2
Inter Miami IIToronto II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Inter Miami IIToronto II
0.82Goals scored / match1.58
Inter Miami IIToronto II
2.65Goals conceded / match1.89
Inter Miami IIToronto II
55%Average possession48%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
4.65Shots on target / match4.47
Inter Miami IIToronto II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.59Shots per match10.11
Inter Miami IIToronto II
4.65Shots on target4.47
Inter Miami IIToronto II
7.1%Shot conversion15.6%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
55%Possession48%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
1.4xG for1.27
Inter Miami IIToronto II
1.91xG against1.67
Inter Miami IIToronto II

Shooting quality

Inter Miami II: BalancedToronto II: Efficient finishing
Inter Miami IIToronto II
Accuracy (shots on target)40%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.180.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Toronto II is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Inter Miami II · 0.6 pts / match - Toronto II

Inter Miami II
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W24% R76% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-13
0.24 pts / match · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-4
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Toronto II
LLLLW
Season result split
37% W16% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-9
1.26 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Toronto II is 93% better for: goals scored per match.

0.82 goals / match - Inter Miami II · 1.58 goals / match - Toronto II

Toronto II is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.65 goals / match - Inter Miami II · 1.89 goals / match - Toronto II

Inter Miami II scoring profile: strong

Inter Miami II scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

Toronto II scoring profile: very strong

Toronto II scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

14Goals scored (season)30
Inter Miami IIToronto II
45Goals conceded (season)36
Inter Miami IIToronto II
3.47Average goals in match3.47
Inter Miami IIToronto II
1Goals scored (last 5)6
Inter Miami IIToronto II
10Goals conceded (last 5)13
Inter Miami IIToronto II

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal74%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
12%2 goals58%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
6%3 goals16%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
6%4 goals5%
Inter Miami IIToronto II

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal79%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
71%2 goals47%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
59%3 goals37%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
35%4 goals16%
Inter Miami IIToronto II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time11%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
12%BTTS in both halves11%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
12%Scored in both halves26%
Inter Miami IIToronto II

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
20%BTTS - last 560%
Inter Miami IIToronto II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Inter Miami IIToronto II

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time68%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time53%
Inter Miami IIToronto II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Toronto II is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.82 pts / match - Inter Miami II · 1.47 pts / match - Toronto II

Inter Miami II - half-time state
18% leading29% draw53% trailing
Toronto II - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.82Points per match (1st half)1.47
Inter Miami IIToronto II
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.74
Inter Miami IIToronto II
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Inter Miami IIToronto II
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.16
Inter Miami IIToronto II
29%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
71%No goal before half-time53%
Inter Miami IIToronto II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.29Points per match (2nd half)0.84
Inter Miami IIToronto II
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
Inter Miami IIToronto II
1.59Goals conceded (2nd half)1.47
Inter Miami IIToronto II
2Average goals (2nd half)2.32
Inter Miami IIToronto II
12%Clean sheet after half-time32%
Inter Miami IIToronto II
59%No goal after half-time47%
Inter Miami IIToronto II

Inter Miami II - second-half results

0% W29% R71% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-20
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Toronto II - second-half results

16% W37% R47% P
28
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.1

Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter Miami II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Toronto II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-8
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter Miami II
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
1
6
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
11
46-60
2
9
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Toronto II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
7
46-60
6
6
61-75
6
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter Miami II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
45%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Toronto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Inter Miami IILigaToronto II
Average goals in match 3.473.23 3.47
Both teams scored 59%60% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%65% 74%
Clean sheets 6%22% 21%
Goal before half-time 82%75% 68%
Goal after half-time 88%84% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Toronto IIYellow cardReid Fisher
  2. Inter Miami IIGoalMateo SajaAssist: Lovens Junior Delinois
  3. Inter Miami IIYellow cardLovens Junior Delinois
  4. Toronto IIGoalReid Fisher
  5. Inter Miami IIYellow cardTheo Vorenkamp
  6. Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Jerremy OrtelaOff: Theo Vorenkamp
  7. Toronto IIYellow cardMicah Chisholm
  8. Inter Miami IIGoalLovens Junior DelinoisAssist: Alejandro Flores
  9. Inter Miami IIYellow cardAlejandro Flores
  10. Inter Miami IIYellow cardMatias Marin
  11. Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Nicholas AlmeidaOff: Matteo De Paula

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Inter Miami II 0 - 0 - 2 Toronto II. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Toronto FC II USL
2 : 0
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
0 : 1
Toronto FC II USL

FAQ

What was the result of Inter Miami II vs Toronto II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Inter Miami II 2:1 Toronto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter Miami II and Toronto II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Inter Miami II won 0, Toronto II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter Miami II vs Toronto II?

Inter Miami II score 0.82 goals per game on average and Toronto II 1.58. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Inter Miami II's matches and 58% of Toronto II's.

What form are Inter Miami II and Toronto II in?

Over the last 5 games Inter Miami II have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Toronto II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Miami II vs Toronto II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.