Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Inter Turku vs Mariehamn: match statistics

Inter Turku crest
Inter Turku
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Mariehamn crest
Mariehamn

Inter Turku vs Mariehamn: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter Turku played Mariehamn in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Inter Turku: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match. Mariehamn: 0-2-1, 0.67 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter Turku scores 1.33 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Mariehamn scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter Turku 33%, Mariehamn 67%. Over 2.5: Inter Turku 33%, Mariehamn 67%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Inter Turku has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.08. Inter Turku: 11.7 shots per match, Mariehamn: 9.3.

Match halves

Inter Turku: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.33. Mariehamn: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Inter Turku: 61-75 (2 goals). Mariehamn: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter Turku holds a clear advantage in the table and form: they are 3rd and in their last 5 matches have a record of 4 wins and 1 draw, averaging 2.6 points per game; Mariehamn are 10th and in their last 5 have 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, averaging 1.6 points per game. In attack Inter at home averages 10.5 shots and 3.5 on target per game, scores 1.0 goals on average with xG 1.44 and has a conversion rate of 10%, whereas Mariehamn away averages 5 shots and 1 on target, records 0.0 goals on average with xG 0.57 and has 0% conversion. Defensively Inter concedes only 0.5 goals per home game and has 50% clean sheets, while Mariehamn concede an average of 3.0 goals away and have kept no clean sheets (0%), with xG against of 0.47 for Inter and 2.09 for Mariehamn. Additionally the hosts control the game (66% possession at home versus 47% for Mariehamn away), create twice as many scoring chances (10.5 vs 5.0) and have a 50% home win rate versus 0% away wins for the visitors; Mariehamn have failed to score in 100% of their away matches and have a 100% away loss rate, which significantly diminishes their chances. On this basis I predict a home win; I estimate probabilities of approximately 78% for Inter, 12% for a draw and 10% for Mariehamn.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Inter Turku at home has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and concedes an average of 1.5 goals per match, indicating the hosts regularly allow opponents to score. Mariehamn on paper has a seasonal BTTS of 0% and averages 0.0 goals scored away, but in the last 5 matches they have scored 12 goals (2.4 per match) and conceded 6 goals (1.2 per match), suggesting an offensive improvement. Inter creates substantially more chances — 11.5 shots and 4.5 on target with xG 1.33 per match, versus Mariehamn 5.0 shots, 1.0 on target and xG 0.57 — the hosts should score, yet they also concede goals themselves (seasonally 1.5 and a total of 4 conceded in the last 5 matches, i.e. 0.8 per match). Considering Inter’s 100% BTTS at home and 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches, while Mariehamn have 40% BTTS in the last 5 and a seasonal away concession rate of 3.0 (6 goals conceded), the scenario of both teams scoring is more probable. Therefore I forecast BTTS - Yes 75% vs No 25%; the pick is based on the extreme seasonal signal from Inter (100% BTTS at home), Mariehamn’s weak away defense (3.0 conceded) and Mariehamn’s offensive improvement in the last 5 matches (2.4 goals scored).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimated expected goals by combining the team’s attacking xG with the opponent’s defensive xG: Inter Turku has an attacking xG of 1.33 per match, while Mariehamn concedes on average xG 2.09 per match, which translates to ~1.71 expected goals for Inter. For Mariehamn I used their attacking xG 0.57 and Inter’s defensive xG 1.66, giving ~1.12 for the visitors; total is approximately 2.83 expected goals. Inter averages 11.5 shots and 4.5 on target per match versus Mariehamn’s 5.0 shots and 1.0 on target, and in the last 5 matches Inter scored on average 1.8 goals while Mariehamn 2.4; these figures support a higher-scoring scenario. A Poisson distribution with a total of 2.83 goals gives about a 77% chance for Over 1.5, ~54% for Over 2.5 and ~31% for Over 3.5. Based on this, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal due to the advantage in attacking xG, clear superiority in shots and accuracy (4.5 vs 1.0) and recent goal form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Inter Turku holds a clear offensive advantage: xG 1.33 versus 0.57 for Mariehamn, averaging 11.5 shots per match versus 5.0 and 4.5 shots on target versus 1.0, which translates into more scoring opportunities. At Half-Time the hosts average 1.0 goal (scoredAVGHT_home = 1.0) while the visitors average 0.0 (scoredAVGHT_away = 0.0), and Inter led at the break in 50% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 50%) whereas Mariehamn were trailing at the break in 100% of cases (trailingAtHTPercentage_away = 100%). Mariehamn concede an average of 3.0 goals per match this season (seasonConcededAVG_away = 3.0) versus 1.5 conceded by Inter (seasonConcededAVG_home = 1.5), and Inter’s shot conversion rate is 13% compared to 0% for the visitors, which increases the hosts’ chances of holding the lead. Inter also show better recent form over the last 5 matches ('wwdww' and 80% wins) versus 40% for Mariehamn, therefore the most probable scenario is the hosts leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Inter TurkuMariehamn
22Shots2
Inter TurkuMariehamn
12Shots on target1
Inter TurkuMariehamn
2.8xG0.47
Inter TurkuMariehamn
12Corners4
Inter TurkuMariehamn
81Dangerous attacks36
Inter TurkuMariehamn
5Fouls6
Inter TurkuMariehamn
1Cards0
Inter TurkuMariehamn

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Inter TurkuMariehamn
1.33Goals scored / match1
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0.33Goals conceded / match2
Inter TurkuMariehamn
57%Average possession49%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
4Shots on target / match3.33
Inter TurkuMariehamn

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.67Shots per match9.33
Inter TurkuMariehamn
4Shots on target3.33
Inter TurkuMariehamn
11.4%Shot conversion10.7%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
57%Possession49%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
1.47xG for1.08
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0.77xG against1.8
Inter TurkuMariehamn

Shooting quality

Inter Turku: BalancedMariehamn: Balanced
Inter TurkuMariehamn
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter Turku is 248% better for: last-5 form.

2.33 pts / match - Inter Turku · 0.67 pts / match - Mariehamn

Inter Turku
DWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 0.77BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
Mariehamn
DLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W67% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter Turku is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Inter Turku · 1 goals / match - Mariehamn

Inter Turku is 506% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.33 goals / match - Inter Turku · 2 goals / match - Mariehamn

Inter Turku scoring profile: very strong

Inter Turku scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Mariehamn keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Mariehamn scoring profile: mixed

Mariehamn scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Inter Turku keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

4Goals scored (season)3
Inter TurkuMariehamn
1Goals conceded (season)6
Inter TurkuMariehamn
1.67Average goals in match3
Inter TurkuMariehamn
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Inter TurkuMariehamn
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
Inter TurkuMariehamn

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
67%2 goals33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%3 goals0%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%4 goals0%
Inter TurkuMariehamn

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%2 goals67%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%3 goals33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%4 goals0%
Inter TurkuMariehamn

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%BTTS in both halves33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%Scored in both halves33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
33%BTTS - last 567%
Inter TurkuMariehamn

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Inter TurkuMariehamn

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Inter TurkuMariehamn

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mariehamn is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - Inter Turku · 1.33 pts / match - Mariehamn

Inter Turku - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Mariehamn - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)1.33
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0.33Average goals (1st half)1.33
Inter TurkuMariehamn
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
100%No goal before half-time33%
Inter TurkuMariehamn

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per match (2nd half)0.33
Inter TurkuMariehamn
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
Inter TurkuMariehamn
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1.33
Inter TurkuMariehamn
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Inter TurkuMariehamn
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Inter TurkuMariehamn
33%No goal after half-time67%
Inter TurkuMariehamn

Inter Turku - second-half results

67% W33% R0% P
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mariehamn - second-half results

0% W33% R67% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter Turku - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.672.33
Goals scored / match0.01.3
Goals conceded / match0.30.0
Average goals in match0.31.3
1 goal33%67%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%100%
No goal100%33%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Mariehamn - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.330.33
Goals scored / match0.70.3
Goals conceded / match0.71.3
Average goals in match1.31.7
1 goal100%100%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%0%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter Turku
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Mariehamn
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter Turku

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
27%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Mariehamn

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
154%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

Inter TurkuLigaMariehamn
Average goals in match 1.672.52 3.00
Both teams scored 33%52% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%48% 67%
Clean sheets 67%28% 0%
Goal before half-time 33%74% 100%
Goal after half-time 67%83% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MariehamnSubstitutionOn: Yeboah AmankwahOff: Adam Stroud
  2. Inter TurkuGoalAlie ContehAssist: Jussi Niska
  3. Inter TurkuYellow cardJanne-Pekka Laine
  4. Inter TurkuSubstitutionOn: Clinton JephtaOff: Antoin Loic Essomba Bikoula

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Inter Turku 0 - 2 - 0 Mariehamn. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FC Inter Turku
0 : 0
IFK Mariehamn
IFK Mariehamn
2 : 2
FC Inter Turku

FAQ

What was the result of Inter Turku vs Mariehamn?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Inter Turku 1:0 Mariehamn. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter Turku and Mariehamn?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Inter Turku won 0, Mariehamn won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter Turku vs Mariehamn?

Inter Turku score 1.33 goals per game on average and Mariehamn 1.00. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Inter Turku's matches and 67% of Mariehamn's.

What form are Inter Turku and Mariehamn in?

Over the last 5 games Inter Turku have a 2-1-0 record (2.33 points per game) and Mariehamn 0-2-1 (0.67 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Turku vs Mariehamn?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.