Finland - VeikkausliigaVeritas StadionData current as of 19 September 2026

Inter Turku vs VPS: match statistics

Inter Turku crest
Inter Turku
1 : 0half-time 0:0
VPS crest
VPS

Inter Turku vs VPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter Turku played VPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 14 September 2026. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Inter Turku: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. VPS: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter Turku scores 1.30 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. VPS scores 1.30 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter Turku 48%, VPS 52%. Over 2.5: Inter Turku 35%, VPS 39%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Inter Turku has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.45. Inter Turku: 14.2 shots per match, VPS: 11.9.

Match halves

Inter Turku: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.70. VPS: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Inter Turku: 46-60 (6 goals). VPS: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter Turku sit 2nd, while VPS are sixth, and the hosts have been particularly strong at home: they concede just 0.55 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 55% of games. Inter’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created, with an average home xG of 1.84 compared with VPS’s 1.46 away from home, while also allowing a lower xG to their opponents: 0.86 versus 1.37. VPS do, however, arrive in better short-term form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring 6 goals in that run, compared with Inter’s 4. Despite this upturn for the visitors, VPS lose 36% of their away matches, while Inter have suffered defeat in only 9% of home games, which slightly shifts the prediction in favour of the hosts. However, Inter’s high home draw rate of 45% leaves a significant probability of the points being shared.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is moderately weaker than neutral: over the course of the season, both teams have recorded this outcome in 50% and 55% of their matches, respectively, but over their last five games, the rate has fallen to 40% for both. During this period, Inter Turku scored only 0.8 goals per match, while VPS averaged 1.2, which reduces confidence that both teams will find the net. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, compared with 27% for VPS, so there is a realistic chance that one side will fail to score. Although the average xG from the last five appearances is similar at 1.37 and 1.35, the league BTTS average is only 49%, making the outcome in which at least one team fails to score more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season profiles of both teams clearly support a limited number of goals: Inter Turku have recorded fewer than 3.5 goals in 67% of their matches, while VPS have done so in as many as 82%. The 2.5-goal line was exceeded in only 42% of the home team’s matches and 36% of the away team’s matches, compared with a league average of 46%. Inter Turku concede an average of 0.92 goals per match, while VPS score an average of 1.00, limiting the visitors’ scoring potential. The last five matches also do not point to an open game, as both teams had at least three goals in 40% of their matches. With an estimated 2.35 goals, there is a clear safety margin for Under 3.5 goals, making it the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Inter Turku led at half-time in 50% of their matches, while VPS were level at the break in as many as 45% of games and led in only 27%. The hosts average 0.92 goals scored and 0.50 conceded before half-time, whereas VPS score just 0.55 goals in this phase and concede 0.73. Across the season, Inter Turku have a higher average number of goals scored, 1.58 compared with 1.00, as well as a better points record: 1.75 points per match compared with 1.36. VPS’s recent form is stronger, with 3 wins in their last 5 appearances, so the probabilities of draw and away variants have been increased significantly. However, Inter’s first-half advantage and home-field edge still provide the strongest support for an HT/FT scenario in which they lead at the break and secure the full-time win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Inter TurkuVPS
13Shots11
Inter TurkuVPS
5Shots on target2
Inter TurkuVPS
1.58xG1.25
Inter TurkuVPS
2Corners5
Inter TurkuVPS
56Dangerous attacks57
Inter TurkuVPS
8Fouls15
Inter TurkuVPS
2Cards3
Inter TurkuVPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.3Goals scored / match1.3
Inter TurkuVPS
0.78Goals conceded / match0.96
Inter TurkuVPS
57%Average possession48%
Inter TurkuVPS
4.61Shots on target / match4.7
Inter TurkuVPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.22Shots per match11.87
Inter TurkuVPS
4.61Shots on target4.7
Inter TurkuVPS
9.2%Shot conversion11%
Inter TurkuVPS
57%Possession48%
Inter TurkuVPS
1.63xG for1.45
Inter TurkuVPS
1.03xG against1.35
Inter TurkuVPS

Shooting quality

Inter Turku: DominantVPS: Balanced
Inter TurkuVPS
Accuracy (shots on target)32%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

VPS is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Inter Turku · 1.8 pts / match - VPS

Inter Turku
DWDWL
Season result split
48% W39% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-3
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
VPS
WLWLW
Season result split
43% W26% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-7
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter Turku is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.78 goals / match - Inter Turku · 0.96 goals / match - VPS

Inter Turku scoring profile: strong

Inter Turku scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).

VPS scoring profile: strong

VPS scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Inter Turku keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 matches).

30Goals scored (season)30
Inter TurkuVPS
18Goals conceded (season)22
Inter TurkuVPS
2.09Average goals in match2.26
Inter TurkuVPS
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Inter TurkuVPS
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Inter TurkuVPS

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal74%
Inter TurkuVPS
39%2 goals26%
Inter TurkuVPS
17%3 goals17%
Inter TurkuVPS
0%4 goals9%
Inter TurkuVPS

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal70%
Inter TurkuVPS
22%2 goals17%
Inter TurkuVPS
4%3 goals9%
Inter TurkuVPS
0%4 goals0%
Inter TurkuVPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Inter TurkuVPS
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Inter TurkuVPS
17%Scored in both halves13%
Inter TurkuVPS

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Inter TurkuVPS
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Inter TurkuVPS
40%BTTS - last 540%
Inter TurkuVPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Inter TurkuVPS
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Inter TurkuVPS
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Inter TurkuVPS

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Inter TurkuVPS
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
Inter TurkuVPS
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Inter TurkuVPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter Turku - half-time state
35% leading43% draw22% trailing
VPS - half-time state
39% leading30% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.48
Inter TurkuVPS
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.74
Inter TurkuVPS
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
Inter TurkuVPS
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.35
Inter TurkuVPS
61%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Inter TurkuVPS
61%No goal before half-time52%
Inter TurkuVPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Inter TurkuVPS
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Inter TurkuVPS
0.3Goals conceded (2nd half)0.35
Inter TurkuVPS
1Average goals (2nd half)0.91
Inter TurkuVPS
78%Clean sheet after half-time70%
Inter TurkuVPS
48%No goal after half-time61%
Inter TurkuVPS

Inter Turku - second-half results

39% W48% D13% L
34
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

VPS - second-half results

30% W48% D22% L
34
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inter Turku - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
VPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.60.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter Turku
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
5
7
16-30
4
4
31-45
6
1
46-60
4
2
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

VPS
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
5
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter Turku

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

Inter TurkuLigaVPS
Average goals in match 2.092.53 2.26
Both teams scored 48%50% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%45% 39%
Clean sheets 48%29% 30%
Goal before half-time 61%73% 78%
Goal after half-time 61%74% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inter TurkuYellow cardRobert Ivanov
  2. VPSYellow cardJayden Turfkruier
  3. VPSSubstitutionOn: Simon LindholmOff: Yassin Daoussi
  4. VPSYellow cardRazak Simpson
  5. Inter TurkuGoalHerman Sjögrell
  6. VPSSubstitutionOn: Casper HolmelundOff: Oluwaseyi Ogunniyi
  7. Inter TurkuSubstitutionOn: Yeboah AmankwahOff: Robert Ivanov
  8. Inter TurkuYellow cardProsper Ahiabu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Inter Turku 3 - 1 - 0 VPS. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 25% matches.

VPS
0 : 1
Inter Turku
Inter Turku
0 : 0
VPS
FC Inter Turku
2 : 1
Vaasan Palloseura
Vaasan Palloseura
0 : 2
FC Inter Turku

FAQ

What was the result of Inter Turku vs VPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Inter Turku 1:0 VPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter Turku and VPS?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Inter Turku won 3, VPS won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter Turku vs VPS?

Inter Turku score 1.30 goals per game on average and VPS 1.30. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Inter Turku's matches and 52% of VPS's.

What form are Inter Turku and VPS in?

Over the last 5 games Inter Turku have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and VPS 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Turku vs VPS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter Turku vs VPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.