El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

Inter vs Cacahuatique: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
130%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Cacahuatique displays significantly better form and statistics in away matches than Inter does at home. The visitors boast an impressive 50% away win rate and a positive goal difference (+3), while the hosts have won only 17% of their home games with a negative balance (-2). Cacahuatique averages 1.5 goals per away match with a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 15%) and performs better in maintaining clean sheets (36% vs 25%). Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), making them the favorite for this encounter. Cacahuatique's advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics suggests a probable victory for the away team.

Inter vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter play Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 24 January 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Inter: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Cacahuatique: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter scores 1.13 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.18 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter 51%, Cacahuatique 57%. Over 2.5: Inter 53%, Cacahuatique 55%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Cacahuatique has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.25. Inter: 7.8 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.9.

Match halves

Inter: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.64. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Inter: 31-45+ (13 goals). Cacahuatique: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Cacahuatique displays significantly better form and statistics in away matches than Inter does at home. The visitors boast an impressive 50% away win rate and a positive goal difference (+3), while the hosts have won only 17% of their home games with a negative balance (-2). Cacahuatique averages 1.5 goals per away match with a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 15%) and performs better in maintaining clean sheets (36% vs 25%). Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), making them the favorite for this encounter. Cacahuatique's advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics suggests a probable victory for the away team.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
InterCacahuatique
7Shots4
InterCacahuatique
3Shots on target1
InterCacahuatique
1.03xG0.57
InterCacahuatique
6Corners1
InterCacahuatique
47Dangerous attacks30
InterCacahuatique
14Fouls4
InterCacahuatique
0Cards0
InterCacahuatique

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.13Goals scored / match1.18
InterCacahuatique
1.4Goals conceded / match1.37
InterCacahuatique
53%Average possession47%
InterCacahuatique
3.56Shots on target / match4.27
InterCacahuatique

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.78Shots per match8.88
InterCacahuatique
3.56Shots on target4.27
InterCacahuatique
14.6%Shot conversion13.3%
InterCacahuatique
53%Possession47%
InterCacahuatique
1.25xG for1.4
InterCacahuatique
1.22xG against1.57
InterCacahuatique

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingCacahuatique: Counter-attacking
InterCacahuatique
Accuracy (shots on target)46%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Inter · 1.2 pts / match - Cacahuatique

Inter
WWLLW
Season result split
29% W33% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-17
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-8-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Cacahuatique
LDWDD
Season result split
29% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-15-20
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-5-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 64% of matches (29 of 45 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (14 of 49 matches).

Cacahuatique scoring profile: very strong

Cacahuatique scores in 73% of matches (36 of 49 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 27% (12 of 45 matches).

51Goals scored (season)58
InterCacahuatique
63Goals conceded (season)67
InterCacahuatique
2.53Average goals in match2.55
InterCacahuatique
5Goals scored (last 5)5
InterCacahuatique
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
InterCacahuatique

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal73%
InterCacahuatique
40%2 goals24%
InterCacahuatique
9%3 goals12%
InterCacahuatique
0%4 goals4%
InterCacahuatique

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal71%
InterCacahuatique
47%2 goals41%
InterCacahuatique
16%3 goals18%
InterCacahuatique
2%4 goals4%
InterCacahuatique

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time12%
InterCacahuatique
4%BTTS in both halves0%
InterCacahuatique
16%Scored in both halves12%
InterCacahuatique

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
InterCacahuatique
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
InterCacahuatique
40%BTTS - last 560%
InterCacahuatique

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
InterCacahuatique
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
InterCacahuatique
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
InterCacahuatique

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
InterCacahuatique
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
InterCacahuatique
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
InterCacahuatique

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Inter · 1.43 pts / match - Cacahuatique

Inter - half-time state
22% leading51% draw27% trailing
Cacahuatique - half-time state
33% leading45% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.43
InterCacahuatique
0.49Goals scored (1st half)0.63
InterCacahuatique
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
InterCacahuatique
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.08
InterCacahuatique
56%Clean sheet before half-time69%
InterCacahuatique
64%No goal before half-time55%
InterCacahuatique

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.08
InterCacahuatique
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
InterCacahuatique
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
InterCacahuatique
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.47
InterCacahuatique
44%Clean sheet after half-time41%
InterCacahuatique
56%No goal after half-time59%
InterCacahuatique

Inter - second-half results

33% W27% R40% P
53
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cacahuatique - second-half results

27% W29% R45% P
70
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
3
14
16-30
13
9
31-45
11
8
46-60
6
10
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
11
8
0-15
12
6
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
13
46-60
8
15
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaCacahuatique
Average goals in match 2.532.67 2.55
Both teams scored 51%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%50% 55%
Clean sheets 27%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 60%68% 63%
Goal after half-time 78%78% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Inter 0 - 0 - 2 Cacahuatique. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Cacahuatique
5 : 0
Inter
Inter
1 : 2
Cacahuatique

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs Cacahuatique?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and Cacahuatique?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, Cacahuatique won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs Cacahuatique?

Inter score 1.13 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.18. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Inter's matches and 57% of Cacahuatique's.

What form are Inter and Cacahuatique in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs Cacahuatique?

The statistical background for Inter vs Cacahuatique — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.