El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 20 September 2026

Inter vs Cacahuatique: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
130%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Cacahuatique displays significantly better form and statistics in away matches than Inter does at home. The visitors boast an impressive 50% away win rate and a positive goal difference (+3), while the hosts have won only 17% of their home games with a negative balance (-2). Cacahuatique averages 1.5 goals per away match with a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 15%) and performs better in maintaining clean sheets (36% vs 25%). Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), making them the favorite for this encounter. Cacahuatique's advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics suggests a probable victory for the away team.

Inter vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter played Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 24 January 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Inter: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Cacahuatique: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter scores 1.09 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.30 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter 59%, Cacahuatique 59%. Over 2.5: Inter 50%, Cacahuatique 67%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Cacahuatique has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.21. Inter: 7.0 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.3.

Match halves

Inter: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.59. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Inter: 31-45+ (7 goals). Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cacahuatique displays significantly better form and statistics in away matches than Inter does at home. The visitors boast an impressive 50% away win rate and a positive goal difference (+3), while the hosts have won only 17% of their home games with a negative balance (-2). Cacahuatique averages 1.5 goals per away match with a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 15%) and performs better in maintaining clean sheets (36% vs 25%). Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), making them the favorite for this encounter. Cacahuatique's advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics suggests a probable victory for the away team.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
InterCacahuatique
7Shots4
InterCacahuatique
3Shots on target1
InterCacahuatique
1.03xG0.57
InterCacahuatique
6Corners1
InterCacahuatique
47Dangerous attacks30
InterCacahuatique
14Fouls4
InterCacahuatique
0Cards0
InterCacahuatique

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.09Goals scored / match1.3
InterCacahuatique
1.59Goals conceded / match1.44
InterCacahuatique
52%Average possession47%
InterCacahuatique
3.41Shots on target / match4
InterCacahuatique

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match8.33
InterCacahuatique
3.41Shots on target4
InterCacahuatique
15.6%Shot conversion15.6%
InterCacahuatique
52%Possession47%
InterCacahuatique
1.21xG for1.35
InterCacahuatique
1.23xG against1.56
InterCacahuatique

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingCacahuatique: Counter-attacking
InterCacahuatique
Accuracy (shots on target)49%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cacahuatique is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Inter · 1.4 pts / match - Cacahuatique

Inter
LLDLW
Season result split
14% W41% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-9-10
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Cacahuatique
WLLWD
Season result split
33% W22% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-12
1.22 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cacahuatique is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Inter · 1.3 goals / match - Cacahuatique

Cacahuatique is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Inter · 1.44 goals / match - Cacahuatique

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

Cacahuatique scoring profile: very strong

Cacahuatique scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

24Goals scored (season)35
InterCacahuatique
35Goals conceded (season)39
InterCacahuatique
2.68Average goals in match2.74
InterCacahuatique
5Goals scored (last 5)5
InterCacahuatique
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
InterCacahuatique

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal78%
InterCacahuatique
36%2 goals33%
InterCacahuatique
5%3 goals11%
InterCacahuatique
0%4 goals4%
InterCacahuatique

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal70%
InterCacahuatique
59%2 goals48%
InterCacahuatique
18%3 goals22%
InterCacahuatique
0%4 goals4%
InterCacahuatique

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time22%
InterCacahuatique
9%BTTS in both halves0%
InterCacahuatique
14%Scored in both halves11%
InterCacahuatique

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
InterCacahuatique
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
InterCacahuatique
40%BTTS - last 560%
InterCacahuatique

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
InterCacahuatique
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
InterCacahuatique
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
InterCacahuatique

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
InterCacahuatique
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
InterCacahuatique
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
InterCacahuatique

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Inter · 1.33 pts / match - Cacahuatique

Inter - half-time state
23% leading45% draw32% trailing
Cacahuatique - half-time state
30% leading44% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.33
InterCacahuatique
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.7
InterCacahuatique
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
InterCacahuatique
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.26
InterCacahuatique
50%Clean sheet before half-time59%
InterCacahuatique
59%No goal before half-time48%
InterCacahuatique

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.22
InterCacahuatique
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
InterCacahuatique
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
InterCacahuatique
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.48
InterCacahuatique
36%Clean sheet after half-time44%
InterCacahuatique
59%No goal after half-time63%
InterCacahuatique

Inter - second-half results

27% W27% D45% L
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cacahuatique - second-half results

33% W22% D44% L
36
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.00.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
7
5
46-60
1
7
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
8
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
3
9
46-60
4
7
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaCacahuatique
Average goals in match 2.682.74 2.74
Both teams scored 59%56% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%53% 67%
Clean sheets 18%26% 30%
Goal before half-time 68%69% 70%
Goal after half-time 82%77% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Emerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Inter 0 - 0 - 1 Cacahuatique. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Inter
1 : 2
Cacahuatique

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs Cacahuatique?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs Cacahuatique?

Inter score 1.09 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.30. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Inter's matches and 59% of Cacahuatique's.

What form are Inter and Cacahuatique in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Cacahuatique 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs Cacahuatique?

The statistical background for Inter vs Cacahuatique — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.