Inter vs Firpo: match statistics
Inter vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Inter played Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Inter: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Firpo: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Inter scores 1.14 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Firpo scores 2.05 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Inter 51%, Firpo 60%. Over 2.5: Inter 51%, Firpo 60%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Firpo has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.26. Inter: 7.8 shots per match, Firpo: 11.5.
Match halves
Inter: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.66. Firpo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.35.
Goals by minute
Inter: 31-45+ (10 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (24 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Stats show a clear advantage for the visitors — Firpo scored 82 goals this season vs Inter’s 40 and average 2.42 away goals, while Inter scores 1.17 at home. Visitors create more shots (10.05 vs 7.94) and have higher efficiency (24% vs 15%), resulting in higher xG for (1.53 vs 1.25). Firpo also have a much better away win% (63%) compared to Inter’s home win% (33%). Both teams concede goals, but Inter’s defense at home (avg 1.00 conceded) looks less stable against Firpo’s attack. Considering the visitors’ offensive edge, form and efficiency, I tip a Firpo win as most likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data indicate advantage for BTTS. Firpo averages 2.42 goals per match, has 24% shot conversion and season BTTS 84%, strongly increasing their scoring likelihood. Inter at home has 52% CS and low conceded avg (0.76), which opposes BTTS, but Inter’s last 5 are weak (0.8 avg scoring, 20% BTTS). League BTTS ~55% and Firpo’s form/efficiency point to Both Teams To Score as the most likely scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Stats indicate clear scoring potential: home xG 2.01 vs opponent xG_against 1.24 suggests ~1.63 xG for Inter, while away xG 1.53 vs home defense 1.15 gives ~1.34 xG for Firpo (sum ~2.97). Firpo has high Over 1.5/2.5/3.5 rates and very high BTTS (84%), boosting likelihood of goals from both sides. Inter records many clean sheets, but their xG and shot efficiency still indicate scoring potential against a weaker away defense. Overall data give the strongest signal for Over 1.5, hence a recommendation to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data show Inter is often drawn at HT (drawingAtHTPercentage_home 57%) and scores relatively few first-half goals (scoredAVGHT_home 0.43), while Firpo tends to score early. Inter dominates the second half — high goals in minutes 61–75 (14), ppg_2hg_home 2.24 and wins_2hg_percentage_home 67% indicate strong finishes. Hosts also have a high season clean sheet rate (seasonCSPercentage_home 52%), increasing the likelihood the decisive goal comes after the break. Firpo is active before HT but second-half stats show a tendency to concede, so HT draw and home win FT (X/1) seems most justified. I therefore recommend HT/FT X/1 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Inter | Firpo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Firpo is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Inter · 1.8 pts / match - Firpo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Firpo is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - Inter · 2.05 goals / match - Firpo
Firpo is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Inter · 1.1 goals / match - Firpo
Inter scores in 66% of matches (23 of 35 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 30% (12 of 40 matches).
Firpo scores in 83% of matches (33 of 40 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Inter
Over / Under - Firpo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Firpo is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Inter · 1.45 pts / match - Firpo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Inter - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Firpo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (24 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Inter
Firpo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Inter | Liga | Firpo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.54 | 2.72 | ▲ 3.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 51% | 55% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 51% | 53% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 68% | • 68% |
| Goal after half-time | • 77% | 78% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FirpoGoalVíctor Vladimir García Campos
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Inter 0 - 2 - 1 Firpo. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Inter vs Firpo?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 0:3 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Inter and Firpo?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, Firpo won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs Firpo?
Inter score 1.14 goals per game on average and Firpo 2.05. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Inter's matches and 60% of Firpo's.
What form are Inter and Firpo in?
Over the last 5 games Inter have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Firpo 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs Firpo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.