El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 07 September 2026

Inter vs INCA-Aruba: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
4 : 1half-time 0:0
INCA-Aruba crest
INCA-Aruba

Inter vs INCA-Aruba: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter played INCA-Aruba in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Inter: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. INCA-Aruba: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter scores 1.00 and concedes 0.40 goals per match. INCA-Aruba scores 0.20 and concedes 2.20. League average: 2.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter 20%, INCA-Aruba 20%. Over 2.5: Inter 20%, INCA-Aruba 40%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Inter has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.44. Inter: 7.0 shots per match, INCA-Aruba: 10.2.

Match halves

Inter: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40. INCA-Aruba: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

Inter: 0-15 (2 goals). INCA-Aruba: 61-75 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.43 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter remain unbeaten in their five matches so far, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while INCA-Aruba have picked up just 1 point from five games and lost four of them. The hosts are yet to concede at home, keeping a clean sheet in 100% of their matches, whereas the visitors have lost every away fixture, conceding an average of 2 goals. INCA-Aruba have failed to score in any away match despite averaging 1.59 xG, highlighting a clear problem with chance conversion. Inter average 56% possession compared to their opponents’ 42% and should be able to control the game more effectively. The hosts are not particularly prolific, averaging 1 goal at home, but their defensive superiority and the visitors’ extremely poor finishing strongly point towards an Inter win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from INCA-Aruba’s very poor attacking efficiency: the visitors have averaged no goals scored this season, while in their last 5 matches they managed only 0.2 goals per game. They also failed to score in 100% of their season fixtures, while BTTS occurred in 0% of their matches, well below the league average of 46%. Inter conceded just 0.4 goals per game across their last five matches and kept a clean sheet in 33% of their season appearances, further limiting the visitors’ chances. The hosts should nevertheless find opportunities against a defence conceding 2.2 goals per game over the last five rounds, despite averaging only 1.0 goal themselves. The visitors’ higher xG of 1.44 is not reflected in their actual goal output, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Inter averaged 1.0 goals scored and conceded just 0.4, while INCA-Aruba scored only 0.2 goals and conceded 2.2 per game. The visitors failed to score in 100% of their matches this season, and their limited attacking output significantly reduces the likelihood of an open game with goals at both ends. The average xG from the last five appearances—1.56 for Inter and 1.44 for INCA-Aruba—suggests chances will be created, but the visitors’ finishing remains very poor. Only 20% of Inter’s recent matches and 40% of INCA-Aruba’s fixtures went Over 2.5 goals, compared with a league average of 2.43 goals. The projected total of 2.20 goals gives a clear edge to the Under 3.5 option, as even a potential home win should remain within the three-goal limit.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Inter are clearly the stronger side based on their current form: they have averaged 1.0 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded across their last five matches, remaining unbeaten throughout, while INCA-Aruba have lost 80% of their games during that period. The visitors have scored just 0.2 goals per match over this stretch and conceded an average of 1.4 goals after half-time, which favours Inter maintaining or extending their lead. Inter were leading at the break in 40% of their recent matches, whereas INCA-Aruba have never gone into half-time with a lead and were behind at the break in 60% of cases. In addition, the hosts kept a clean sheet after half-time in all five of their last matches, making the HT/FT scenario of Inter leading at the break and securing the final victory the strongest outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
4 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
InterINCA-Aruba
13Shots5
InterINCA-Aruba
9Shots on target2
InterINCA-Aruba
1.79xG0.66
InterINCA-Aruba
4Corners4
InterINCA-Aruba
47Dangerous attacks28
InterINCA-Aruba
9Fouls10
InterINCA-Aruba
0Cards0
InterINCA-Aruba

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.2
InterINCA-Aruba
0.4Goals conceded / match2.2
InterINCA-Aruba
56%Average possession42%
InterINCA-Aruba
2.8Shots on target / match4.6
InterINCA-Aruba

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match10.2
InterINCA-Aruba
2.8Shots on target4.6
InterINCA-Aruba
14.3%Shot conversion2%
InterINCA-Aruba
56%Possession42%
InterINCA-Aruba
1.56xG for1.44
InterINCA-Aruba
1.62xG against1.95
InterINCA-Aruba

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingINCA-Aruba: Balanced
InterINCA-Aruba
Accuracy (shots on target)40%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.04

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 800% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Inter · 0.2 pts / match - INCA-Aruba

Inter
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W60% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
INCA-Aruba
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W20% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter is 400% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Inter · 0.2 goals / match - INCA-Aruba

Inter is 450% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.4 goals / match - Inter · 2.2 goals / match - INCA-Aruba

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while INCA-Aruba keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

INCA-Aruba scoring profile: more difficult

INCA-Aruba scores in 20% of matches (1 of 5 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 80% (4 of 5 matches).

5Goals scored (season)1
InterINCA-Aruba
2Goals conceded (season)11
InterINCA-Aruba
1.4Average goals in match2.4
InterINCA-Aruba
5Goals scored (last 5)1
InterINCA-Aruba
2Goals conceded (last 5)11
InterINCA-Aruba

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal20%
InterINCA-Aruba
40%2 goals0%
InterINCA-Aruba
0%3 goals0%
InterINCA-Aruba
0%4 goals0%
InterINCA-Aruba

How often they concede at least...

20%1 goal80%
InterINCA-Aruba
20%2 goals80%
InterINCA-Aruba
0%3 goals40%
InterINCA-Aruba
0%4 goals20%
InterINCA-Aruba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
InterINCA-Aruba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
InterINCA-Aruba
40%Scored in both halves0%
InterINCA-Aruba

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
InterINCA-Aruba
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
InterINCA-Aruba
20%BTTS - last 520%
InterINCA-Aruba

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
InterINCA-Aruba
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
InterINCA-Aruba
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
InterINCA-Aruba

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
InterINCA-Aruba
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
InterINCA-Aruba
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
InterINCA-Aruba

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Inter · 0.4 pts / match - INCA-Aruba

Inter - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
INCA-Aruba - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)0.4
InterINCA-Aruba
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0
InterINCA-Aruba
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
InterINCA-Aruba
1Average goals (1st half)0.8
InterINCA-Aruba
80%Clean sheet before half-time40%
InterINCA-Aruba
40%No goal before half-time100%
InterINCA-Aruba

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)0.2
InterINCA-Aruba
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
InterINCA-Aruba
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
InterINCA-Aruba
0.4Average goals (2nd half)1.6
InterINCA-Aruba
100%Clean sheet after half-time20%
InterINCA-Aruba
60%No goal after half-time80%
InterINCA-Aruba

Inter - second-half results

40% W60% R0% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

INCA-Aruba - second-half results

0% W20% R80% P
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.00.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
INCA-Aruba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

INCA-Aruba
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
20%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
12%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
32%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

INCA-Aruba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
19%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaINCA-Aruba
Average goals in match 1.402.43 2.40
Both teams scored 20%46% 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%39% 40%
Clean sheets 80%38% 20%
Goal before half-time 60%61% 60%
Goal after half-time 40%61% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.43
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Darwin Adelso Cerén Delgado⚽ 1
Jairo Mauricio Henriquez Ferrufino⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Bryan Manrique Paz Ayala⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. INCA-ArubaGoalBryan Manrique Paz Ayala
  2. InterGoalDarwin Adelso Cerén Delgado

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs INCA-Aruba?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 4:1 INCA-Aruba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs INCA-Aruba?

Inter score 1.00 goals per game on average and INCA-Aruba 0.20. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Inter's matches and 20% of INCA-Aruba's.

What form are Inter and INCA-Aruba in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and INCA-Aruba 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs INCA-Aruba?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter vs INCA-Aruba: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.