Inverness CT vs Queen of the South: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inverness CT played Queen of the South in League One (Scotland). The match was played on 22 November 2025. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Inverness CT: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Queen of the South: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inverness CT scores 1.69 and concedes 0.62 goals per match. Queen of the South scores 1.36 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inverness CT 31%, Queen of the South 36%. Over 2.5: Inverness CT 38%, Queen of the South 50%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Inverness CT has higher xG: 1.96 vs 1.33. Inverness CT: 15.8 shots per match, Queen of the South: 11.2.

Match halves

Inverness CT: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.92. Queen of the South: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Inverness CT: 46-60 (5 goals). Queen of the South: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Inverness CTQueen of the South
14Shots1
Inverness CTQueen of the South
8Shots on target1
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.76xG0.36
Inverness CTQueen of the South
6Corners1
Inverness CTQueen of the South
44Dangerous attacks29
Inverness CTQueen of the South
11Fouls14
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1Cards2
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.69Goals scored / match1.36
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.62Goals conceded / match1.14
Inverness CTQueen of the South
50%Average possession50%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
7.08Shots on target / match4.5
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.85Shots per match11.21
Inverness CTQueen of the South
7.08Shots on target4.5
Inverness CTQueen of the South
10.7%Shot conversion12.1%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
50%Possession50%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.96xG for1.33
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.9xG against1.46
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Shooting quality

Inverness CT: AttackingQueen of the South: Balanced
Inverness CTQueen of the South
Accuracy (shots on target)45%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inverness CT is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Inverness CT · 1.6 pts / match - Queen of the South

Inverness CT
LDWWW
Season result split
77% W8% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-1-2
2.38 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Queen of the South
LWDWD
Season result split
43% W21% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-5
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inverness CT is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.69 goals / match - Inverness CT · 1.36 goals / match - Queen of the South

Inverness CT is 84% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.62 goals / match - Inverness CT · 1.14 goals / match - Queen of the South

Inverness CT scoring profile: very strong

Inverness CT scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Queen of the South keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

Queen of the South scoring profile: mixed

Queen of the South scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Inverness CT keeps a clean sheet in 69% (9 of 13 matches).

22Goals scored (season)19
Inverness CTQueen of the South
8Goals conceded (season)16
Inverness CTQueen of the South
2.31Average goals in match2.5
Inverness CTQueen of the South
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Inverness CTQueen of the South
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
Inverness CTQueen of the South

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal71%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
46%2 goals36%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
15%3 goals21%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
8%4 goals7%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

How often they concede at least...

31%1 goal57%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
23%2 goals36%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
8%3 goals14%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0%4 goals7%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

36%
Queen of the South - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 14 matches
45%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time7%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
38%Scored in both halves36%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
40%BTTS - last 540%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
15%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inverness CT - half-time state
38% leading46% draw15% trailing
Queen of the South - half-time state
43% leading36% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1.64
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.15Average goals (1st half)1
Inverness CTQueen of the South
69%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
38%No goal before half-time50%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

After half-time (2nd half)

2.23Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.23Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Inverness CTQueen of the South
85%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
23%No goal after half-time43%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Inverness CT - second-half results

69% W15% D15% L
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Queen of the South - second-half results

36% W21% D43% L
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inverness CT - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Queen of the South - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inverness CT
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
5
1
46-60
4
0
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Queen of the South
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inverness CT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Queen of the South

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Inverness CTLigaQueen of the South
Average goals in match 2.312.55 2.50
Both teams scored 31%45% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%53% 50%
Clean sheets 69%30% 43%
Goal before half-time 69%71% 71%
Goal after half-time 85%81% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inverness CTGoalLiam SoleAssist: Chanka Zimba
  2. Inverness CTYellow cardChanka Zimba
  3. Inverness CTGoalChanka ZimbaAssist: Adam Mackinnon
  4. Queen of the SouthSubstitutionOn: Taylor ChartersOff: Liam Smith
  5. Inverness CTGoalAdam MackinnonAssist: Mitchell Robertson
  6. Queen of the SouthSubstitutionOn: Niall RogersonOff: Kai Kennedy
  7. Inverness CTGoalAlfie BavidgeAssist: Adam Mackinnon
  8. Queen of the SouthSubstitutionOn: Ben JohnstoneOff: Brennan Dickenson
  9. Queen of the SouthYellow cardBenjamin Lussint
  10. Queen of the SouthSubstitutionOn: Billy GrayOff: Kurtis Guthrie
  11. Queen of the SouthYellow cardZander Mackenzie

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Inverness CT 1 - 0 - 0 Queen of the South. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Queen of the South FC
0 : 2
Inverness Caledonian Thistle FC

FAQ

What was the result of Inverness CT vs Queen of the South?

The League One match finished Inverness CT 4:0 Queen of the South. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Inverness CT vs Queen of the South?

Inverness CT score 1.69 goals per game on average and Queen of the South 1.36. The League One average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Inverness CT's matches and 36% of Queen of the South's.

What form are Inverness CT and Queen of the South in?

Over the last 5 games Inverness CT have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Queen of the South 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inverness CT vs Queen of the South?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inverness CT vs Queen of the South: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.