Irapuato vs CA La Paz: match statistics
Irapuato vs CA La Paz: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Irapuato played CA La Paz in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Irapuato: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. CA La Paz: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Irapuato scores 1.58 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. CA La Paz scores 1.76 and concedes 1.48. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Irapuato 55%, CA La Paz 56%. Over 2.5: Irapuato 61%, CA La Paz 60%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
CA La Paz has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.56. Irapuato: 12.5 shots per match, CA La Paz: 14.0.
Match halves
Irapuato: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.06. CA La Paz: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Irapuato: 46-60 (13 goals). CA La Paz: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ascenso MX: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CA La Paz has a clear advantage in form — in their last five matches they recorded 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 11 goals and conceding only 2 (an average of 2.2 points per match), while Irapuato in their last 5 has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, scoring 9 and conceding 13 (0.8 points per match). Seasonal metrics favor the home side offensively: Irapuato at home averages 2.27 goals per game, xG 1.84, 15.07 shots and 5.93 on target with 59% possession, whereas CA La Paz away posts 1.58 goals, xG 1.34, 11.25 shots and 4 on-target efforts. Defensively the numbers are mixed — Irapuato concedes 1.33 goals at home versus 1.5 conceded by La Paz away, however in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded only 2 goals compared to 13 conceded by the hosts. Considering Irapuato’s declining defensive form and the visitors’ stability, I project a narrow CA La Paz victory as the most likely outcome. Additionally both teams tend to produce high-scoring games (home average total 3.6 and away teams 3.08), so I expect an open match with at least a few goals.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates above 50%: Irapuato 54% and CA La Paz 58%, with the league average at 56%, indicating a bias toward a Goal/Goal scenario. Irapuato averages 1.92 scored and 1.46 conceded (xG 1.96 for / 1.39 against), while CA La Paz averages 1.58 scored and 1.50 conceded (xG 1.34 for / 1.88 against), so both sides generate xG figures comparable to the opponent’s defensive profile. In the last 5 matches Irapuato conceded an average of 2.6 goals per game, versus CA La Paz’s 0.4, but CA La Paz scored 2.2 on average (Irapuato 1.8), meaning that despite La Paz’s stronger recent defensive form both teams possess offensive strengths. Additionally, Irapuato averages 7.23 shots on target versus CA La Paz’s 4.0 and has a higher share of matches over 2.5 goals (69% vs 50%), therefore I take clear support for BTTS and tip Yes (64%) versus 36% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect around 3.29 goals: Irapuato has xG_for 1.96 vs xG_against CA La Paz 1.88 → ~1.92 xG for the home side, while CA La Paz xG_for 1.34 vs xG_against Irapuato 1.39 → ~1.37 xG for the away side. Seasonal goals averages are 1.92 (Irapuato) and 1.58 (CA La Paz), totaling 3.50 goals per match, whereas the league average is 2.92, which supports a trend toward high-scoring games. Irapuato averages 7.23 shots on target and 16.62 attempts, CA La Paz 4.00 shots on target and 11.25 attempts; with conversion rates of 12% and 14% both teams have realistic goal-scoring potential, and BTTS rates are 54% and 58% respectively. In the last 5 matches Irapuato conceded 13 goals (2.6 avg), and CA La Paz conceded 2 (0.4 avg), which somewhat limits the risk of an extremely high-scoring game, but seasonal Over% show 92%/75% for Over 1.5 and 69%/50% for Over 2.5. Therefore I back the Over side on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal (ou_pred_over_15 86%), with a significant probability for Over 2.5 (64%) and lower for Over 3.5 (43%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Irapuato holds a seasonal advantage: average xG 1.96 versus 1.34 for CA La Paz, average goals scored 1.92 vs 1.58 and more shots on target (7.23 vs 4.0), increasing the likelihood of taking and maintaining a lead at the break. The hosts have led at half-time in 46% of matches (6 times), while the visitors only in 33% (4 times); additionally Irapuato wins 46% of matches this season compared to CA La Paz’s 25% win rate, so the scenario of the hosts leading at half-time and winning by full-time is supported by seasonal statistics. Form must be taken into account: in the last 5 matches the visitors have a 60% win rate versus 20% for the hosts and score on average 1.0 goals by half-time in those five games (vs 0.2 for Irapuato), which gives them a real chance of a draw or a lead after 45 minutes. Considering the xG and chance-volume advantage (7.23 vs 4.0) and the more frequent leads for the hosts at the break (46%), the model favors HT/FT 1/1 (32%), with lower probabilities for X/1 (9%) and 2/2 (17%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Irapuato | CA La Paz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CA La Paz is 175% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Irapuato · 2.2 pts / match - CA La Paz
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CA La Paz is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.58 goals / match - Irapuato · 1.76 goals / match - CA La Paz
Irapuato scores in 71% of matches (22 of 31 matches), while CA La Paz keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).
CA La Paz scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Irapuato keeps a clean sheet in 29% (9 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Irapuato
Over / Under - CA La Paz
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CA La Paz is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / match - Irapuato · 1.48 pts / match - CA La Paz
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Irapuato - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CA La Paz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Irapuato
CA La Paz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).
Teams vs league
| Irapuato | Liga | CA La Paz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.06 | 2.91 | ▲ 3.24 |
| Both teams scored | • 55% | 56% | • 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 53% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | • 74% | 74% | ▲ 84% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 80% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Irapuato 0 - 1 - 0 CA La Paz. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Irapuato vs CA La Paz?
The Ascenso MX match finished Irapuato 3:1 CA La Paz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Irapuato vs CA La Paz?
Irapuato score 1.58 goals per game on average and CA La Paz 1.76. The Ascenso MX average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Irapuato's matches and 56% of CA La Paz's.
What form are Irapuato and CA La Paz in?
Over the last 5 games Irapuato have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and CA La Paz 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Irapuato vs CA La Paz?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


