Ironi Kiryat Shmona vs Maccabi Haifa: match statistics
Ironi Kiryat Shmona vs Maccabi Haifa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ironi Kiryat Shmona played Maccabi Haifa in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 6 December 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Maccabi Haifa: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ironi Kiryat Shmona scores 1.17 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Maccabi Haifa scores 1.75 and concedes 1.17. League average: 3.25 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ironi Kiryat Shmona 75%, Maccabi Haifa 67%. Over 2.5: Ironi Kiryat Shmona 67%, Maccabi Haifa 50%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Ironi Kiryat Shmona has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.58. Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 14.2 shots per match, Maccabi Haifa: 13.8.
Match halves
Ironi Kiryat Shmona: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.58. Maccabi Haifa: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 0-15 (4 goals). Maccabi Haifa: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ironi Kiryat Shmona | Maccabi Haifa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maccabi Haifa is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona · 1.4 pts / match - Maccabi Haifa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maccabi Haifa is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona · 1.75 goals / match - Maccabi Haifa
Maccabi Haifa is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.42 goals / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona · 1.17 goals / match - Maccabi Haifa
Ironi Kiryat Shmona scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Maccabi Haifa keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
Maccabi Haifa scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Ironi Kiryat Shmona keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Over / Under - Maccabi Haifa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maccabi Haifa is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona · 1.58 pts / match - Maccabi Haifa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ironi Kiryat Shmona - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Maccabi Haifa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Maccabi Haifa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ironi Kiryat Shmona | Liga | Maccabi Haifa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.58 | 3.25 | ▼ 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 24% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Ironi Kiryat Shmona vs Maccabi Haifa?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Ironi Kiryat Shmona 0:1 Maccabi Haifa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ironi Kiryat Shmona vs Maccabi Haifa?
Ironi Kiryat Shmona score 1.17 goals per game on average and Maccabi Haifa 1.75. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Ironi Kiryat Shmona's matches and 67% of Maccabi Haifa's.
What form are Ironi Kiryat Shmona and Maccabi Haifa in?
Over the last 5 games Ironi Kiryat Shmona have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Maccabi Haifa 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ironi Kiryat Shmona vs Maccabi Haifa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ironi Kiryat Shmona vs Maccabi Haifa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.