Ironi Tiberias vs Maccabi Netanya: match statistics
Ironi Tiberias vs Maccabi Netanya: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ironi Tiberias played Maccabi Netanya in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 4:3.
Current form
Ironi Tiberias: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Maccabi Netanya: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ironi Tiberias scores 1.27 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. Maccabi Netanya scores 1.70 and concedes 1.90. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ironi Tiberias 47%, Maccabi Netanya 63%. Over 2.5: Ironi Tiberias 47%, Maccabi Netanya 67%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Netanya has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.31. Ironi Tiberias: 10.7 shots per match, Maccabi Netanya: 14.8.
Match halves
Ironi Tiberias: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Maccabi Netanya: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.90.
Goals by minute
Ironi Tiberias: 61-75 (9 goals). Maccabi Netanya: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ironi Tiberias averages 1.36 goals scored and concedes 1.5 goals per home match, keeping a clean sheet in 43% of home games. Maccabi Netanya shows better offensive metrics this season (51 goals scored, 1.57 goals per away match and xG 1.72 vs Ironi's xG 1.45), but concedes as many as 2.21 goals on the road and has only 7% clean sheets away. In the last 5 matches the hosts are unbeaten (2 wins, 3 draws, averaging 1.8 points per game) and have conceded just 1 goal, while Netanya recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss in that period (2.0 points per game) and conceded 2 goals. Netanya produces more shots and shots on target (average 14.86 shots with 5.29 on target away vs 12.07 and 4.64 for Ironi), but conversion is similar (around 11%), which reduces their offensive edge. Given the clear defensive advantage for the hosts (1.5 vs 2.21 goals conceded and 43% vs 7% clean sheets) and Ironi's form stability, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Long-term indicators strongly support BTTS: Ironi Tiberias has a season BTTS of 69%, Maccabi Netanya 57%, the combined average is 63%, which exceeds the league level of 54%. Offensive-defensive metrics confirm goal potential — xG for attack 1.79 (home) vs 1.72 (away) with xG against 1.68 and 1.66, and seasonal goal averages are 1.81 vs 1.57 with conceded averages 1.63 and 2.21, meaning both teams create and allow chances. However, account for a weakening signal from recent form: in the last 5 matches BTTS is only 20% for both teams, and Maccabi has 36% of season matches without scoring, which reduces confidence in both teams finding the net in this fixture. Considering the superiority of seasonal indicators (average BTTS 63%, Over2.5: 56%/79% and over25+BTTS 50%/56%) over the short-term form dip, I assign 65% to "yes" (BTTS - Yes) and 35% to "no" as the optimal choice.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goal-average analysis points to a high-chance scoring game: the home team averages 1.81 goals per match (xG 1.79), the visitors average 1.57 goals (xG 1.72), and the defenses concede 1.63 and 2.21 goals respectively; averaging the offensive xG and opponent defensive xG yields a forecast of ~1.73 goals for Ironi and ~1.70 for Netanya, totaling ~3.43 goals. Seasonal trends support the over: Ironi has 56% of matches over 2.5 goals, Netanya 79% (league average 56% over 2.5), while over 1.5 occurs in 88% and 93% of matches respectively. Both teams frequently score and concede — BTTS rates are 69% for the home side and 57% for the visitors, with average shots on target of 6.06 vs 5.29 per match. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 6 goals each (avg 1.2), and the combined projected xG 3.43 exceeds the league mean 2.96, so I expect a higher-than-typical total. Consequently the strongest signal is Over 2.5 (I back Over at the 2.5 line) with an estimated probability of ~68%; Over 1.5 is even safer (~92%), while Over 3.5 carries lower probability (~36%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is the home side leading at the break: Ironi Tiberias led at half-time in 38% of their home matches (6 times), and their average goals by half-time is 0.88 versus 0.71 for Maccabi Netanya. After the break the visitors concede an average of 1.29 goals, while the hosts score an average of 0.94 goals, which suggests the home team is more likely to maintain or extend the lead. Over the full match the hosts win 44% of home fixtures compared to 43% of away wins for the visitors, but Netanya have only a 7% clean sheet rate on the road, meaning they rarely finish without conceding. Additionally, Ironi have a higher average points at half-time (1.44 vs 1.07) and more goals scored by half-time (27 vs 23), therefore the 1/1 HT/FT scenario is most likely and I assign it a 27% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ironi Tiberias | Maccabi Netanya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maccabi Netanya is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Ironi Tiberias · 2 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maccabi Netanya is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
1.27 goals / match - Ironi Tiberias · 1.7 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya
Ironi Tiberias is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.77 goals / match - Ironi Tiberias · 1.9 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya
Ironi Tiberias scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Maccabi Netanya keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
Maccabi Netanya scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Ironi Tiberias keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ironi Tiberias
Over / Under - Maccabi Netanya
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maccabi Netanya is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Ironi Tiberias · 1.27 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ironi Tiberias - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Maccabi Netanya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ironi Tiberias
Maccabi Netanya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ironi Tiberias | Liga | Maccabi Netanya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.03 | 2.96 | ▲ 3.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 55% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 27% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 67% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Ironi Tiberias 1 - 0 - 1 Maccabi Netanya. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ironi Tiberias vs Maccabi Netanya?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Ironi Tiberias 4:3 Maccabi Netanya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ironi Tiberias and Maccabi Netanya?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ironi Tiberias won 1, Maccabi Netanya won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ironi Tiberias vs Maccabi Netanya?
Ironi Tiberias score 1.27 goals per game on average and Maccabi Netanya 1.70. The Israeli Premier League average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Ironi Tiberias's matches and 63% of Maccabi Netanya's.
What form are Ironi Tiberias and Maccabi Netanya in?
Over the last 5 games Ironi Tiberias have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Maccabi Netanya 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ironi Tiberias vs Maccabi Netanya?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


