Isidro Metapán vs Cacahuatique: match statistics
Isidro Metapán vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Isidro Metapán played Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Isidro Metapán: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Cacahuatique: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Isidro Metapán scores 1.24 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.21 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Isidro Metapán 59%, Cacahuatique 55%. Over 2.5: Isidro Metapán 56%, Cacahuatique 57%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Cacahuatique has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.29. Isidro Metapán: 9.2 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.9.
Match halves
Isidro Metapán: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.63. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Isidro Metapán: 31-45+ (15 goals). Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams have 51 goals this season, suggesting an evenly matched contest, but the statistics reveal differences in playing profiles. Isidro Metapán at home averages 10.2 shots (5.05 on target), 53% possession, scores 1.2 goals and concedes 1.15 per match, and records xG 1.44 vs xG-against 1.10, indicating better chance creation and a solid defense. Cacahuatique away averages 8.38 shots (4.52 on target), scores 1.38 goals and concedes 1.19, but posts a higher shot conversion rate 16% versus the home side’s 12% and is less likely to be shut out (FTS 19% vs 35%), and in the last 5 matches has scored 8 goals (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses). Over the last 5 rounds the visitors average 1.4 points per match versus 1.2 for the hosts, giving them a slight form edge, however the xG and shot volume advantage favor Isidro. Considering these figures, I forecast a narrow home win (prediction "1").
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 57% for Isidro Metapán and 52% for Cacahuatique versus a league average of 54%, providing a baseline edge for BTTS - Yes. Hosts concede 1.52 goals per match on average, while visitors score 1.38 for the season and 1.6 in the last 5 games, indicating Cacahuatique’s recent attacking efficiency against Metapán’s weaker defense. xG reads 1.53 for Metapán and 1.31 for Cacahuatique (combined ~2.84 xG), with xG against at 1.47 and 1.57 respectively, suggesting both sides create scoring opportunities. Additionally, visitors have a higher shot conversion rate at 16% versus hosts' 11% and more shots on target (4.52 vs 4.1), while clean sheets stand at 29% and 33%, so both teams possess goal-scoring potential and vulnerability to conceding. Therefore I prefer BTTS = "Yes" with a 65% probability.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect 1.55 goals for Isidro Metapán and 1.39 for Cacahuatique, totaling 2.94 goals in the match. Based on xG: Isidro has xG 1.53 while Cacahuatique concedes 1.57 xG (yielding ~1.55 for the home side); Cacahuatique has xG 1.31 against Isidro conceding 1.47 xG (yielding ~1.39 for the away side). Seasonal stats confirm a propensity for goals — Over 1.5 occurred in 76% of Isidro’s matches and 71% of Cacahuatique’s, and Over 2.5 in 52% and 62% respectively, which increases the likelihood of at least three goals. Both teams also have a high share of matches with Both Teams To Score: 57% for the home team and 52% for the away, and the visitors average 4.52 shots on target converting 16% of attempts versus Isidro’s 4.1 SOT and 11% conversion, which raises the odds of goals from both sides. Consequently I pick Over 2.5 as the strongest signal: an expected total of 2.94 and seasonal Over 2.5 rates (52%/62%) imply roughly a 64% chance of Over 2.5 in this analysis.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time data shows an away advantage: Cacahuatique led at the break in 10 of 21 matches (48%), while Isidro Metapán led only in 3 of 21 (14%). Full-time results also favor the visitors — Cacahuatique won 10 of 21 fixtures (48%) with an average points per game of 1.57 versus 0.81 for the home side. The visitors are also more efficient in shots and conversion: 4.52 shots on target and a 16% conversion rate versus 4.1 and 11% for Metapán; at half-time they average 0.81 goals versus 0.52 for the hosts and concede only 0.24. Although the home xG is 1.53 compared with 1.31 for the visitors, the lower number of goals conceded by the visitors at the break and their higher finishing efficiency suggest the most likely scenario is Cacahuatique leading at the break and the visitors winning at full-time (HT/FT 2/2). Alternatively, X/2 and X/X are worth considering given the frequency of half-time draws (HT: 14% home lead, 38% draw, 48% away lead).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Isidro Metapán | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cacahuatique is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Isidro Metapán · 1.4 pts / match - Cacahuatique
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Isidro Metapán is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.24 goals / match - Isidro Metapán · 1.36 goals / match - Cacahuatique
Isidro Metapán scores in 73% of matches (30 of 41 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 31% (13 of 42 matches).
Cacahuatique scores in 74% of matches (31 of 42 matches), while Isidro Metapán keeps a clean sheet in 27% (11 of 41 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Isidro Metapán
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Isidro Metapán - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Isidro Metapán
Cacahuatique
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Isidro Metapán | Liga | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.49 | 2.72 | ▼ 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 54% | • 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 27% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 67% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 78% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Isidro MetapánGoalSteven Antonio Guerra Tejada
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Isidro Metapán 0 - 3 - 0 Cacahuatique. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Isidro Metapán vs Cacahuatique?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Isidro Metapán 1:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Isidro Metapán and Cacahuatique?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Isidro Metapán won 0, Cacahuatique won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Isidro Metapán vs Cacahuatique?
Isidro Metapán score 1.24 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.21. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Isidro Metapán's matches and 55% of Cacahuatique's.
What form are Isidro Metapán and Cacahuatique in?
Over the last 5 games Isidro Metapán have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Cacahuatique 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Isidro Metapán vs Cacahuatique?
The statistical background for Isidro Metapán vs Cacahuatique — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


