Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 24 July 2026

İstanbulspor vs Keçiörengücü: match statistics

135%(2.25)
X35%(3.40)
230%(2.54)

Statistical analysis points to a very evenly matched encounter between İstanbulspor and Keçiörengücü. The hosts have a solid home record with 60% draws and only 10% losses, suggesting they are difficult to beat on their own turf. Keçiörengücü presents better form over the last five matches (2.0 PPG vs 1.4 PPG) and higher scoring efficiency (2.0 goals on average away), yet they have never kept a clean sheet in away matches. The xG values for both teams are nearly identical (1.43 vs 1.41 for hosts, 1.36 vs 1.39 against), confirming the balance of power. Given the hosts' high tendency to draw at home and the comparable quality of both squads, a sharing of points is the most probable result.

İstanbulspor vs Keçiörengücü: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

İstanbulspor play Keçiörengücü in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 19 January 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

İstanbulspor: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Keçiörengücü: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

İstanbulspor scores 1.50 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Keçiörengücü scores 1.87 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: İstanbulspor 55%, Keçiörengücü 62%. Over 2.5: İstanbulspor 58%, Keçiörengücü 59%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Keçiörengücü has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.34. İstanbulspor: 11.8 shots per match, Keçiörengücü: 13.3.

Match halves

İstanbulspor: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.87. Keçiörengücü: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

İstanbulspor: 76-90+ (14 goals). Keçiörengücü: 31-45+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis points to a very evenly matched encounter between İstanbulspor and Keçiörengücü. The hosts have a solid home record with 60% draws and only 10% losses, suggesting they are difficult to beat on their own turf. Keçiörengücü presents better form over the last five matches (2.0 PPG vs 1.4 PPG) and higher scoring efficiency (2.0 goals on average away), yet they have never kept a clean sheet in away matches. The xG values for both teams are nearly identical (1.43 vs 1.41 for hosts, 1.36 vs 1.39 against), confirming the balance of power. Given the hosts' high tendency to draw at home and the comparable quality of both squads, a sharing of points is the most probable result.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
12Shots17
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
5Shots on target5
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
1.36xG1.85
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
0Corners8
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
34Dangerous attacks60
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
8Fouls16
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
2Cards3
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
1.5Goals scored / match1.87
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
1.45Goals conceded / match1.13
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
48%Average possession48%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
4.53Shots on target / match4.95
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.84Shots per match13.28
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
4.53Shots on target4.95
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
12.7%Shot conversion14.1%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
48%Possession48%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
1.34xG for1.5
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
1.35xG against1.2
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

Shooting quality

İstanbulspor: BalancedKeçiörengücü: Efficient finishing
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
Accuracy (shots on target)38%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

İstanbulspor is 71% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - İstanbulspor · 1.4 pts / match - Keçiörengücü

İstanbulspor
LWWWW
Season result split
34% W34% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-13-12
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Keçiörengücü
DLWWL
Season result split
41% W31% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-11
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-5-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Keçiörengücü is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - İstanbulspor · 1.87 goals / match - Keçiörengücü

Keçiörengücü is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - İstanbulspor · 1.13 goals / match - Keçiörengücü

İstanbulspor scoring profile: strong

İstanbulspor scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Keçiörengücü keeps a clean sheet in 28% (11 of 39 matches).

Keçiörengücü scoring profile: very strong

Keçiörengücü scores in 79% of matches (31 of 39 matches), while İstanbulspor keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

57Goals scored (season)73
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
55Goals conceded (season)44
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
2.95Average goals in match3
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
17Goals scored (last 5)6
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal79%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
37%2 goals44%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
26%3 goals31%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
8%4 goals13%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal72%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
32%2 goals28%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
18%3 goals8%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
13%4 goals5%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
Keçiörengücü - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.24 of 39 matches
50%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time28%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
5%BTTS in both halves3%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
29%Scored in both halves33%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS49%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
80%BTTS - last 540%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time51%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Keçiörengücü is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - İstanbulspor · 1.62 pts / match - Keçiörengücü

İstanbulspor - half-time state
21% leading45% draw34% trailing
Keçiörengücü - half-time state
41% leading38% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)1.62
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
0.63Goals scored (1st half)1.1
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
1.34Average goals (1st half)1.69
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
39%Clean sheet before half-time56%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
53%No goal before half-time36%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)1.28
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.31
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
61%Clean sheet after half-time54%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü
53%No goal after half-time51%
İstanbulsporKeçiörengücü

İstanbulspor - second-half results

34% W42% R24% P
41
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Keçiörengücü - second-half results

26% W51% R23% P
63
Half-time points
43
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

İstanbulspor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match1.22.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Keçiörengücü - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.60.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

İstanbulspor
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
9
6
16-30
9
17
31-45
12
10
46-60
7
7
61-75
14
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Keçiörengücü
ScoredConceded
12
10
0-15
13
9
16-30
18
4
31-45
7
5
46-60
10
5
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (18 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

İstanbulspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Keçiörengücü

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-25.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

İstanbulsporLigaKeçiörengücü
Average goals in match 2.952.92 3.00
Both teams scored 55%50% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%54% 59%
Clean sheets 24%29% 28%
Goal before half-time 76%71% 79%
Goal after half-time 71%80% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: İstanbulspor 0 - 1 - 0 Keçiörengücü. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Keçiörengücü Spor Kulübü
0 : 0
İstanbulspor AŞ

FAQ

What was the result of İstanbulspor vs Keçiörengücü?

The 1. Lig match finished İstanbulspor 2:2 Keçiörengücü. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before İstanbulspor vs Keçiörengücü?

İstanbulspor score 1.50 goals per game on average and Keçiörengücü 1.87. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 55% of İstanbulspor's matches and 62% of Keçiörengücü's.

What form are İstanbulspor and Keçiörengücü in?

Over the last 5 games İstanbulspor have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Keçiörengücü 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for İstanbulspor vs Keçiörengücü?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.