Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 06 September 2026

Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

Ittihad Tanger crest
Ittihad Tanger
1 : 1half-time 1:0
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to a balanced competition with a prevalence of the draw scenario. Ittihad Tanger presents weak form at their own stadium with barely 14% home wins and a high percentage of draws (57%). UTS Rabat has not won any away match this season, but as many as 50% of meetings ended in a split of points. Both teams have effectiveness problems – the hosts score an average of only 0.71 goals per home match, and the visitors 0.5 away. The form of both teams in the last five matches is poor (Ittihad 0.8 PPG, UTS 0.6 PPG), which further speaks for a draw. Considering the close xG values and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most probable result is a split of points.

Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ittihad Tanger played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Ittihad Tanger: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. UTS Rabat: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ittihad Tanger scores 0.77 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 0.77 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ittihad Tanger 54%, UTS Rabat 69%. Over 2.5: Ittihad Tanger 31%, UTS Rabat 23%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.09. Ittihad Tanger: 9.5 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 7.6.

Match halves

Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.54. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (3 goals). UTS Rabat: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.05 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a balanced competition with a prevalence of the draw scenario. Ittihad Tanger presents weak form at their own stadium with barely 14% home wins and a high percentage of draws (57%). UTS Rabat has not won any away match this season, but as many as 50% of meetings ended in a split of points. Both teams have effectiveness problems – the hosts score an average of only 0.71 goals per home match, and the visitors 0.5 away. The form of both teams in the last five matches is poor (Ittihad 0.8 PPG, UTS 0.6 PPG), which further speaks for a draw. Considering the close xG values and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most probable result is a split of points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
14Shots12
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
3Shots on target5
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.58xG1.59
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
2Corners2
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
67Dangerous attacks66
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
13Fouls14
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
3Cards4
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.77Goals scored / match0.77
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.31Goals conceded / match1.38
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
52%Average possession45%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
2.54Shots on target / match2.85
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.46Shots per match7.62
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
2.54Shots on target2.85
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
8.1%Shot conversion10.1%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
52%Possession45%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.21xG for1.09
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.49xG against1.48
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

Ittihad Tanger: BalancedUTS Rabat: Balanced
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)27%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 0.6 pts / match - UTS Rabat

Ittihad Tanger
WDLLL
Season result split
15% W46% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-5
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
UTS Rabat
DDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W62% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-8-5
0.62 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ittihad Tanger is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.38 goals / match - UTS Rabat

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: very strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 matches).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: very strong

UTS Rabat scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

10Goals scored (season)10
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
17Goals conceded (season)18
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
2.08Average goals in match2.15
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal69%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
15%2 goals8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%3 goals0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal100%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
38%2 goals31%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
8%3 goals8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time23%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
8%Scored in both halves8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
40%BTTS - last 560%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ittihad Tanger is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.92 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 0.85 pts / match - UTS Rabat

Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
15% leading46% draw38% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
8% leading62% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per match (1st half)0.85
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.31
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.77Average goals (1st half)0.92
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
54%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
77%No goal before half-time69%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.92
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
38%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
54%No goal after half-time54%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

15% W54% R31% P
12
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.01.2
Average goals in match0.01.8
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
6
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Ittihad TangerLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals in match 2.082.05 2.15
Both teams scored 54%43% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%34% 23%
Clean sheets 15%35% 0%
Goal before half-time 62%57% 54%
Goal after half-time 69%72% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.05
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ittihad TangerGoalJawad GhabraAssist: Abdel Hamid Maâli
  2. UTS RabatYellow cardWalid Rhailouf
  3. Ittihad TangerYellow cardAbdel Hamid Maâli
  4. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Yassine ZraaOff: Abdelhay El Forsy
  5. UTS RabatYellow cardFouad Zahouani
  6. UTS RabatGoalYacine BammouAssist: Youness Dahmani
  7. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Haitam El BahjaOff: Loay El Moussaoui
  8. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Nacer MoustaghfirOff: Yacine Bammou
  9. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Hamza El MoudeneOff: Faouzi Abd El Mouttalib
  10. Ittihad TangerYellow cardHamza El Moudene
  11. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Souhail ZamratOff: Mohamed Fouzair
  12. Ittihad TangerYellow cardMohamed Saoud
  13. UTS RabatYellow cardMehdi Assahabi
  14. UTS RabatYellow cardMohammed Amine Essahel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Amine MaataouiMatches officiated: 8
5.25Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins25%Draws38%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 1:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat?

Ittihad Tanger score 0.77 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 0.77. The Botola Pro average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 69% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are Ittihad Tanger and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and UTS Rabat 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.