Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca: match statistics
Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ittihad Tanger played Wydad Casablanca in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 3 June 2026. Venue: Grand Stade de Tanger. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Ittihad Tanger: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Wydad Casablanca: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ittihad Tanger scores 0.81 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Wydad Casablanca scores 1.57 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ittihad Tanger 57%, Wydad Casablanca 48%. Over 2.5: Ittihad Tanger 24%, Wydad Casablanca 43%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Wydad Casablanca has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.29. Ittihad Tanger: 10.6 shots per match, Wydad Casablanca: 11.3.
Match halves
Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.52. Wydad Casablanca: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.57.
Goals by minute
Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (6 goals). Wydad Casablanca: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wydad Casablanca is the favorite due to a clear attacking edge: the visitors average 1.64 goals away with an average xG of 1.35, while Ittihad Tanger at home scores only 0.70 goals with xG 1.28. Wydad averages 4.27 shots on target per match and has a conversion rate around 16%, versus the hosts’ 2.7 SoT and 6% conversion, indicating greater efficiency in chance conversion. Additionally, Wydad has a 55% away win rate and a +8 away goal difference, whereas Ittihad win only 10% of home matches and have a -3 home goal difference; the visitors concede 0.91 goals on average away, the hosts 1.0. However, note that Ittihad record as many as 70% draws at home and in their last 5 league matches have a 2 wins and 3 draws record with an average of 1.8 points per match, so a draw is a realistic outcome. Considering Wydad’s higher effectiveness (1.64 vs 0.70) and superior away record, I forecast an away win, with a significant probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams give mixed signals: Ittihad Tanger has a seasonal BTTS of 50%, Wydad 45%, and the league BTTS rate is 51%, providing a neutral baseline. A strong argument against BTTS is the high clean sheet rate — the home side keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches, and the league clean sheet rate reaches 61%, increasing the likelihood that one side will fail to score. On the other hand, attacking metrics are moderate: Ittihad has xG 1.52 and averages 5.2 shots on target, Wydad has xG 1.35 and 4.27 shots on target; their opponents allow on average xG 1.29 (against Ittihad) and 1.38 (against Wydad). In the last 5 matches Ittihad had BTTS in 60% of games and conceded on average 0.6 goals, while Wydad had BTTS in 40% and conceded on average 1.0 goal, so the visitors are more prone to concede. Considering the high home clean sheet rate (50%) and the league clean sheet rate of 61% alongside moderate xG, I project 55% for 'No' and 45% for 'BTTS - Yes' as the most rational forecast.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combined xG and defensive averages yield an expected 1.45 goals for Ittihad Tanger (attacking xG 1.52 vs Wydad defense 1.38) and 1.32 for Wydad Casablanca (attacking xG 1.35 vs Ittihad defense 1.29), total 2.77 goals. The Poisson distribution for λ=2.77 translates to ~76% chance of Over 1.5 (≥2 goals), ~52% for Over 2.5 (≥3) and ~30% for Over 3.5 (≥4). Seasonal figures support Over 1.5: Ittihad have 70% of matches over 1.5, Wydad 55%, and both teams have Over 0.5 in 90% and 91% respectively, indicating rare scoreless matches. The hosts average 12.2 shots and 5.2 on target per game versus visitors’ 10.45/4.27, and Wydad convert 16% of shots compared to Ittihad’s 12%, so the probability of at least two goals is realistic. Therefore the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5 (line 1.5) with probability around 76%, while Over 2.5 is only moderately likely (~52%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast an HT/FT 1/1 — Ittihad leading at the break and the hosts winning — because Ittihad Tanger led at half-time in 6 home matches (60%) and average 1.0 goals in the first half while conceding only 0.2. Additionally, Ittihad have superior expected goals and offensive metrics: xG 1.52 versus 1.35 for Wydad, average shots 12.2 versus 10.45 and on-target shots 5.2 versus 4.27. Over the full match the hosts also show better points and defensive parameters — season PPG 2.0 versus 1.82 and clean sheets in 50% of home games versus 27% for away — which increases the likelihood of holding the lead. The hosts have not been trailing at the break (0% trailingAtHT_home), and most first-half goals occur between the 31st–45th minute (6 goals for each side), which favors Ittihad taking the lead by half-time. Although Wydad are in good recent form over the last 5 matches (3 wins, 60%), the strongest numerical signals from xG, shots and half-time statistics point to 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ittihad Tanger | Wydad Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wydad Casablanca is 94% better for: goals scored per match.
0.81 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.57 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca
Wydad Casablanca is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.1 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 0.86 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca
Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Wydad Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).
Wydad Casablanca scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ittihad Tanger
Over / Under - Wydad Casablanca
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wydad Casablanca is 86% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.95 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ittihad Tanger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wydad Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ittihad Tanger
Wydad Casablanca
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Ittihad Tanger | Liga | Wydad Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.90 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 51% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 38% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 31% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | • 62% | 62% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ittihad Tanger 0 - 0 - 1 Wydad Casablanca. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca?
The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 2:1 Wydad Casablanca. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca?
Ittihad Tanger score 0.81 goals per game on average and Wydad Casablanca 1.57. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 48% of Wydad Casablanca's.
What form are Ittihad Tanger and Wydad Casablanca in?
Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Wydad Casablanca 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


