Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour: match statistics
Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ittihad Tanger played Yacoub El Mansour in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: Grand Stade de Tanger. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Ittihad Tanger: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Yacoub El Mansour: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ittihad Tanger scores 0.83 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Yacoub El Mansour scores 1.04 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.12 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ittihad Tanger 57%, Yacoub El Mansour 74%. Over 2.5: Ittihad Tanger 26%, Yacoub El Mansour 52%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 37%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Ittihad Tanger: 10.7 shots per match, Yacoub El Mansour: 10.6.
Match halves
Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.57. Yacoub El Mansour: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (7 goals). Yacoub El Mansour: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.12 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 37%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X): Ittihad Tanger records as many as 64% draws at home, while Yacoub El Mansour draws 36% of their away matches, increasing the likelihood of a shared point. In the last 5 matches Ittihad has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (avg. 1.6 points per game), whereas Yacoub has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses (avg. 1.0 point), so the hosts are in better form. In terms of goals, Ittihad at home scores 0.82 and concedes 1.00 with xG 1.29 for and 1.38 against, while the visitors away score 0.91 and concede 1.55 with xG 1.20/1.13, which suggests the hosts defend better than xG indicates and the visitors have defensive issues. The visitors register more shots on target (3.27 vs 2.82) and have a higher shot conversion rate (10% vs 8%), but the hosts attempt more shots overall (10.82 vs 9.09) and are less likely to finish a match goalless (27% vs 36%), which favors a low-scoring draw as the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 83% (Ittihad Tanger) and 64% (Yacoub El Mansour), indicating a high probability of mutual scoring. In the last 5 matches Yacoub has BTTS 100% and Ittihad 60%, which further supports a both-teams-to-score scenario. Seasonal goal averages show the home side scoring 1.17 and conceding 1.58, while the visitors score 0.91 and concede 1.55 – both teams concede on average over 1.5 goals, which favors BTTS. xG stands at 1.43 versus 1.20 for the attacking sides with xG against 1.17 and 1.13, and the hosts average 12 shots and 3.58 on target versus 9.09 and 3.27 for the visitors, providing a sufficient number of scoring opportunities. The only constraint is the seasonal percentage of the visitors’ matches without a goal at 36%; therefore, weighing all data I assess BTTS at 78% vs 22% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Estimated xG is 1.28 for Ittihad Tanger and 1.19 for Yacoub El Mansour, totaling 2.47 goals, which favors Over 1.5. This season the home side recorded Over 1.5 in 92% of matches, the away side in 82%, while the league average is 2.12 goals per game — a very strong signal for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line the data are mixed: seasonally Over 2.5 is 58% for hosts and 45% for visitors, and our xG of 2.47 is slightly below 2.5, hence a moderate edge for Over (approx. 54%). The high share of both teams to score (home 83%, away 64%) and the shots on target counts (3.58 vs 3.27) increase the likelihood of at least two goals, whereas Over 3.5 looks unlikely (seasonal 25%/9%, my estimate 18%). The best and most reliable line to play is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time: the home side were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%), while the visitors recorded half-time draws in 6 matches this season (55%). In the second half I favor Ittihad Tanger to secure victory, as their average xG is 1.43 versus the opponents' 1.20, and the home team averages 12 shots compared to the visitors' 9.09, giving them a clear offensive edge. Additionally, 92% of the home matches have seen goals after the break, so a half-time draw is frequently resolved in the hosts’ favor in the second period. A full-time draw remains plausible: seasonally full-time draws occurred for the home team in 33% and for the visitors in 36% of matches, and both teams often scored — the home side in 83% of matches and the visitors in 64%. Based on this I select X/1 as the strongest signal (draw at half-time, home win), combining the 60% half-time draw rate in the last five matches with the xG/shots advantage and a better recent home win record of 40% versus 20% for the visitors in the last five games.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ittihad Tanger | Yacoub El Mansour | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ittihad Tanger is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yacoub El Mansour is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.04 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Ittihad Tanger is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.09 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.57 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Ittihad Tanger scores in 65% of matches (15 of 23 matches), while Yacoub El Mansour keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 matches).
Yacoub El Mansour scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ittihad Tanger
Over / Under - Yacoub El Mansour
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ittihad Tanger is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 0.91 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ittihad Tanger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Yacoub El Mansour - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ittihad Tanger
Yacoub El Mansour
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Ittihad Tanger | Liga | Yacoub El Mansour | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.91 | 2.12 | ▲ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 50% | ▲ 74% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 26% | 37% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 31% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | • 61% | 61% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 72% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ittihad Tanger 1 - 0 - 0 Yacoub El Mansour. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour?
The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 2:1 Yacoub El Mansour. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour?
Ittihad Tanger score 0.83 goals per game on average and Yacoub El Mansour 1.04. The Botola Pro average is 2.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 74% of Yacoub El Mansour's.
What form are Ittihad Tanger and Yacoub El Mansour in?
Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Yacoub El Mansour 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


