JäPS vs EIF: match statistics
JäPS vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JäPS play EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
JäPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. EIF: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
JäPS scores 0.93 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. EIF scores 1.40 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JäPS 27%, EIF 53%. Over 2.5: JäPS 47%, EIF 67%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
EIF has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.21. JäPS: 9.5 shots per match, EIF: 10.2.
Match halves
JäPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.40. EIF: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
JäPS: 61-75 (4 goals). EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 1-2-1. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 50%.
Match description
JäPS has strong home metrics: 100% wins at home, averaging 1 goal scored and 0 conceded per match and 100% clean sheets, while in the last 5 matches their overall record is 3-1-1 (7-5 goals). EIF are the inverse on the road — 0% wins and 100% defeats away, conceding on average 4 goals per game and with a last-5 record of 1-0-4 (7-11 goals). In chance-quality terms the visitors produce more xG and shots: away xG 1.95 vs hosts 1.24, 14 shots (6 on target) vs 10 shots (4 on target) and conversion 14% vs 10%. However EIF’s high activity does not translate defensively — opponents’ xG against EIF away is 1.55 and they concede on average 4 goals, whereas JäPS at home have opponents’ xG 0.48 and concede 0 goals on average. Given JäPS’s 100% home wins and 100% clean sheets and EIF’s poor run (4 defeats in their last 5), I predict a home win and estimate probabilities roughly: Home 65%, Draw 20%, EIF 15%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JäPS | EIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JäPS is 500% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - JäPS · 0.2 pts / match - EIF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
0.93 goals / match - JäPS · 1.4 goals / match - EIF
JäPS is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.53 goals / match - JäPS · 2 goals / match - EIF
JäPS scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — JäPS
Over / Under — EIF
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JäPS is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - JäPS · 1 pts / match - EIF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JäPS
EIF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JäPS | Liga | EIF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.47 | 2.47 | ▲ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 44% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 44% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 31% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 73% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): JäPS 1 - 2 - 1 EIF. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of JäPS vs EIF?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 3:0 EIF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JäPS and EIF?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches JäPS won 1, EIF won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs EIF?
JäPS score 0.93 goals per game on average and EIF 1.40. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 27% of JäPS's matches and 53% of EIF's.
What form are JäPS and EIF in?
Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and EIF 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs EIF?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JäPS vs EIF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.