JäPS vs EIF: match statistics
JäPS vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JäPS played EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
JäPS: 1-1-1, 1.33 points/match. EIF: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
JäPS scores 0.33 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. EIF scores 1.67 and concedes 2.33. League average: 1.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JäPS 0%, EIF 100%. Over 2.5: JäPS 33%, EIF 100%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
EIF has higher xG: 1.48 vs 0.92. JäPS: 6.7 shots per match, EIF: 11.7.
Match halves
JäPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.00. EIF: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
JäPS: 31-45+ (1 goals). EIF: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 1.94 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JäPS has strong home metrics: 100% wins at home, averaging 1 goal scored and 0 conceded per match and 100% clean sheets, while in the last 5 matches their overall record is 3-1-1 (7-5 goals). EIF are the inverse on the road — 0% wins and 100% defeats away, conceding on average 4 goals per game and with a last-5 record of 1-0-4 (7-11 goals). In chance-quality terms the visitors produce more xG and shots: away xG 1.95 vs hosts 1.24, 14 shots (6 on target) vs 10 shots (4 on target) and conversion 14% vs 10%. However EIF’s high activity does not translate defensively — opponents’ xG against EIF away is 1.55 and they concede on average 4 goals, whereas JäPS at home have opponents’ xG 0.48 and concede 0 goals on average. Given JäPS’s 100% home wins and 100% clean sheets and EIF’s poor run (4 defeats in their last 5), I predict a home win and estimate probabilities roughly: Home 65%, Draw 20%, EIF 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The dominant signal for BTTS - Yes comes from season-long indicators: both JäPS and EIF have seasonBTTSPercentage at 100% (JäPS 100% and EIF 100%), while the seasonCSPercentage for both teams is 0%, suggesting no clean sheets expected. Offensive data confirm risk of goals from both sides — EIF has xG_for 1.95 against JäPS defense xG_against 1.44, and JäPS has xG_for 1.25 against EIF defense xG_against 1.55; additionally average shots 10.5 vs 14.0 and SOT 5 vs 6. Seasonal goals averages are 1.5 for JäPS and 2.0 for EIF, with average goals conceded 1.5 and 4.0 respectively, indicating EIF regularly scores but also concedes a lot (4.0). Despite anomalies in the last 5 matches (JäPS last5 BTTS 0% vs EIF 100% and EIF conceded 11 goals in the last 5), season-long 100% BTTS and 100% over2.5 for both teams lead me to choose BTTS - Yes with a confidence of 85% vs 15% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: JäPS has 1.25 xG, EIF has 1.95 xG, and xG against is 1.44 for JäPS and 1.55 for EIF; the average of these values yields a projection of 1.40 goals for the home side and 1.70 for the visitors (total 3.10). In the last 5 matches JäPS scored 7 and conceded 5 (avg 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded), while EIF scored 7 and conceded 11 (1.4 scored and 2.2 conceded), indicating greater defensive vulnerability for EIF. Seasonally both teams have scored and conceded in 100% of matches, and the seasonal share of matches over 2.5 goals is 100% for both sides, although in the last 5 matches JäPS had only 40% of games >2.5. A Poisson model for the 3.10 total forecasts roughly an 82% chance of Over 1.5, about 60% for Over 2.5 and about 38% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally EIF averages 14.0 shots (6.0 on target) versus JäPS 10.5 shots (5.0 on target), and with a combined conversion rate of 14% this supports the scenario of at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
HT statistics and form indicate JäPS holds the advantage in the first half: the home side has led at the break in 50% of matches and scores an average of 0.5 goals before halftime, while EIF has been behind at the break in 100% of games and concedes an average of 2.0 goals before the interval. After 90 minutes JäPS has a 50% home win rate and averages 1.5 points per home match this season, versus 0 wins and 0.0 points for EIF away, which substantially increases the hosts’ probability of a full-time victory. At the same time both teams have scored in 100% of matches, and goals frequently occur after the break — average second-half goals are 2.5 for the home side and 3.0 for the visitors; EIF also posts a higher xG of 1.95 compared to the home team’s 1.25, but simultaneously concedes an average of 4.0 goals per match. Considering the hosts’ tendency to lead at the break and their superior full-time metrics, the most likely scenario is 1/1 (JäPS leading at half-time and winning), therefore I select '1/1' as the primary pick, while acknowledging the risk of goals after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JäPS | EIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.10 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JäPS is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.33 pts / match - JäPS · 1 pts / match - EIF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 406% better for: goals scored per match.
0.33 goals / match - JäPS · 1.67 goals / match - EIF
JäPS is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - JäPS · 2.33 goals / match - EIF
JäPS scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
EIF scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JäPS
Over / Under - EIF
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.33 | 0.67 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Average goals in match | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 33% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 67% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JäPS
EIF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JäPS | Liga | EIF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.00 | 1.94 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 31% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 33% | 50% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): JäPS 0 - 2 - 1 EIF. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of JäPS vs EIF?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 3:0 EIF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JäPS and EIF?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches JäPS won 0, EIF won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs EIF?
JäPS score 0.33 goals per game on average and EIF 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's matches and 100% of EIF's.
What form are JäPS and EIF in?
Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and EIF 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs EIF?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JäPS vs EIF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.