Finland - YkkösliigaJärvenpään keskuskenttäData current as of 01 September 2026

JäPS vs KäPa: match statistics

JäPS crest
JäPS
0 : 0half-time 0:0
KäPa crest
KäPa

JäPS vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JäPS played KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: Järvenpään keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

JäPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. KäPa: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

JäPS scores 0.90 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. KäPa scores 1.05 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JäPS 25%, KäPa 65%. Over 2.5: JäPS 45%, KäPa 70%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

KäPa has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.21. JäPS: 9.7 shots per match, KäPa: 10.8.

Match halves

JäPS: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.40. KäPa: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

JäPS: 31-45+ (4 goals). KäPa: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-2. Average goals 3.80, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JäPS have a clearly superior home record: they win 60% of their matches, keep a clean sheet in 60% of them, and concede just 1.0 goal on average. KäPa lose as many as 70% of their away matches, score an average of 1.0 goal, and their defence allows 1.9 goals per game. The visitors’ current run is particularly concerning, as they have lost all of their last 5 matches, conceding 11 goals while scoring just 4. The hosts are not in strong form either, with 2 wins in their last 5 outings, but their chance quality at home is slightly better: their xG stands at 1.26 compared with KäPa’s 1.23 away from home. JäPS’s defensive advantage, combined with KäPa’s poor run and vulnerability on the road, points towards a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes has a moderate edge, as both teams have very rarely kept a clean sheet this season: just 10% each, while their average goals conceded stand at 1.6 and 1.9 respectively. KäPa have recorded BTTS in 70% of their matches, compared with 60% for JäPS, both clearly above the league average of 44%. The hosts average 1.43 xG with 4.0 shots on target, while the KäPa defence allows opponents 1.67 xG, making a JäPS goal realistic despite their weaker recent run. The risk to the Yes scenario comes from their current attacking form, as both teams have scored only 4 goals in their last five matches, and JäPS recorded BTTS in just 20% of those games. Nevertheless, KäPa conceded 11 goals during this period, or 2.2 per match, so it is more likely that both sides will find the net than that one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have gone over 1.5 goals in 80% of their matches this season, while KäPa concede an average of 1.9 goals per game. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.43 xG, compared with the 1.67 xG allowed by KäPa’s defense, reinforcing the prospect of them scoring at least once. JäPS also have clear defensive issues, conceding an average of 1.6 goals and allowing opponents 1.58 xG, so despite averaging 0.8 goals in their last five matches, the visitors should have opportunities. However, both teams’ attacking form is limited, as each has scored only 4 goals in their last five appearances, making the 2.5 line more evenly balanced. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, supported by the high frequency of matches featuring at least two goals and both sides’ weak defensive averages.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

JäPS have a clearly stronger current record: they have won 2 of their last 5 matches, while KäPa have lost all 5 and conceded an average of 2.2 goals per game during this period, compared with 1.2 for the home side. JäPS were leading at the break in 40% of their last five appearances, whereas KäPa have not once gone into half-time ahead and were trailing at half-time in 60% of those matches. JäPS also create more chances, averaging 1.43 xG and 4.0 shots on target per game, compared with 1.23 xG and 2.8 shots on target for the visitors. Although the hosts score only 0.6 goals per game after the break, KäPa lose the second half in 60% of their matches and have not won any, making a JäPS lead at half-time followed by a maintained victory the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
JäPSKäPa
15Shots18
JäPSKäPa
0Shots on target7
JäPSKäPa
1.35xG2.07
JäPSKäPa
8Corners9
JäPSKäPa
56Dangerous attacks63
JäPSKäPa
9Fouls4
JäPSKäPa
3Cards0
JäPSKäPa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.9Goals scored / match1.05
JäPSKäPa
1.45Goals conceded / match1.75
JäPSKäPa
45%Average possession49%
JäPSKäPa
3.45Shots on target / match3.4
JäPSKäPa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.7Shots per match10.75
JäPSKäPa
3.45Shots on target3.4
JäPSKäPa
9.3%Shot conversion9.8%
JäPSKäPa
45%Possession49%
JäPSKäPa
1.21xG for1.33
JäPSKäPa
1.58xG against1.63
JäPSKäPa

Shooting quality

JäPS: BalancedKäPa: Balanced
JäPSKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JäPS
WLWLL
Season result split
45% W5% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-1-10
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
KäPa
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W20% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-12
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KäPa is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - JäPS · 1.05 goals / match - KäPa

JäPS is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - JäPS · 1.75 goals / match - KäPa

JäPS scoring profile: very strong

JäPS scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).

KäPa scoring profile: strong

KäPa scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 matches).

18Goals scored (season)21
JäPSKäPa
29Goals conceded (season)35
JäPSKäPa
2.35Average goals in match2.8
JäPSKäPa
4Goals scored (last 5)4
JäPSKäPa
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
JäPSKäPa

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal70%
JäPSKäPa
20%2 goals30%
JäPSKäPa
5%3 goals5%
JäPSKäPa
0%4 goals0%
JäPSKäPa

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal90%
JäPSKäPa
40%2 goals65%
JäPSKäPa
25%3 goals20%
JäPSKäPa
15%4 goals0%
JäPSKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time20%
JäPSKäPa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JäPSKäPa
10%Scored in both halves15%
JäPSKäPa

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
JäPSKäPa
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
JäPSKäPa
20%BTTS - last 580%
JäPSKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
JäPSKäPa
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
JäPSKäPa
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
JäPSKäPa

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
JäPSKäPa
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
JäPSKäPa
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
JäPSKäPa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JäPS is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - JäPS · 1.15 pts / match - KäPa

JäPS - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
25% leading40% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)1.15
JäPSKäPa
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.55
JäPSKäPa
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
JäPSKäPa
0.9Average goals (1st half)1.3
JäPSKäPa
65%Clean sheet before half-time55%
JäPSKäPa
60%No goal before half-time55%
JäPSKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)0.6
JäPSKäPa
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
JäPSKäPa
1.05Goals conceded (2nd half)1
JäPSKäPa
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.5
JäPSKäPa
50%Clean sheet after half-time30%
JäPSKäPa
65%No goal after half-time60%
JäPSKäPa

JäPS - second-half results

25% W35% R40% P
29
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KäPa - second-half results

5% W45% R50% P
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JäPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
1
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
7
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
3
6
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
1
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JäPSLigaKäPa
Average goals in match 2.352.50 2.80
Both teams scored 25%44% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%45% 70%
Clean sheets 45%31% 10%
Goal before half-time 65%63% 70%
Goal after half-time 75%72% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JäPSYellow cardPeetu Haikonen
  2. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Sebastian SaviniOff: Sameli Puputti
  3. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Niklas LeinonenOff: Keaton Isaksson
  4. JäPSYellow cardAleksi Sainio
  5. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Emil AholaOff: Daniel Ripatti
  6. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Otto HeinonenOff: Reko Huhtamäki
  7. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Reza HeidariOff: Ville Ahola
  8. JäPSYellow cardCharles Katashira

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): JäPS 2 - 1 - 2 KäPa. Average goals 3.80, both teams scored in 80% matches.

KäPa
3 : 1
JäPS
KäPa
2 : 1
JäPS
Käpylän Pallo
2 : 3
Järvenpään Palloseura
Käpylän Pallo
0 : 3
Järvenpään Palloseura
Järvenpään Palloseura
2 : 2
Käpylän Pallo

FAQ

What was the result of JäPS vs KäPa?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 0:0 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between JäPS and KäPa?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches JäPS won 2, KäPa won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs KäPa?

JäPS score 0.90 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.05. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 25% of JäPS's matches and 65% of KäPa's.

What form are JäPS and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and KäPa 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs KäPa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JäPS vs KäPa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.