Finland - YkkösliigaJärvenpään keskuskenttäData current as of 06 September 2026

JäPS vs MP: match statistics

JäPS crest
JäPS
0 : 2half-time 0:0
MP crest
MP

JäPS vs MP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JäPS played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 22 May 2026. Venue: Järvenpään keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

JäPS: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. MP: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

JäPS scores 1.00 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. MP scores 0.57 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.35 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JäPS 0%, MP 29%. Over 2.5: JäPS 29%, MP 29%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

MP has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.04. JäPS: 8.0 shots per match, MP: 11.0.

Match halves

JäPS: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.43. MP: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.14.

Goals by minute

JäPS: 16-30 (2 goals). MP: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.35 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). JäPS win 75% of home games, average 1.25 goals scored per home match and have scored 15 goals in the last 5 fixtures, winning 4 of 5. MP struggle away — 75% away defeats, concede 1.25 goals on average away and score only 0.5 goals on the road, with 50% of away matches goalless for them. Additionally, JäPS concede just 0.25 goals at home and record 75% clean sheets, while MP have only 25% clean sheets and conceded 12 goals in their last 5 games. Although MP have higher possession (51% vs 44%) and slightly higher away xG (1.27 vs 1.07), MP’s low shot conversion (5% vs 15% for JäPS) and poorer recent form (MP 1.2 pts vs JäPS 2.4 pts per game in the last 5) favor the home side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonally JäPS has BTTS in 33% of matches, MP in 25%, but in the last 5 fixtures JäPS recorded BTTS in 40% and MP as high as 80%, which gives a strong short-term signal for both teams to score. In the last five matches JäPS averaged 3.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while MP averaged 1.8 scored and 2.4 conceded — MP regularly allows goals, and JäPS has recently been prolific in attack. xG values confirm this: the home side has xG 1.40 versus 1.32 conceded by MP (1.36 expected for JäPS on average), and MP has xG 1.27 versus 1.20 from the home side (1.24 on average for MP), translating to roughly 74% and 71% chances of scoring at least one goal. Seasonal clean sheet percentages are 33% for JäPS and 25% for MP, and average on-target shots 3.67 (JäPS) vs 4.25 (MP) suggest the visitors create slightly more chances and have a real opportunity to score. Considering MP’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, the high xG for both teams (1.36 and 1.24) and recent goal averages 3.0 and 1.8, I assess the probability of BTTS - Yes at 53% vs No at 47%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Estimated xG for this match is about 1.36 for JäPS (1.4 xG for, 1.32 xG conceded by MP) and 1.24 for MP (1.27 xG for, 1.20 xG conceded by JäPS), totaling ≈2.60 expected goals. In the last 5 matches JäPS averaged 3.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded (3.6 goals per game), while MP averaged 1.8 scored and 2.4 conceded (4.2 total), indicating recently open, higher-scoring games. Seasonally, however, JäPS only averages 0.67 goals per game with 67% of matches under 2.5, MP 0.50 goals with 75% under 2.5, and the league averages 2.35 goals per game, which limits the probability of very high scores. Additionally, JäPS averages 12.33 shots (3.67 on target), MP 10.0 (4.25 on target), but the conversion rate is only 5%, so not all chances become goals. Considering the combined xG ≈2.60 and the very high recent goal figures (last 5 matches: JäPS 3.6, MP 4.2 average goals per game), the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (recommended). I assess full-match probabilities as follows: Over 1.5 ≈86%, Over 2.5 ≈60% (in the last 5 matches proportion of games above 2.5: JäPS 40% and MP 80%), and Over 3.5 ≈30% due to seasonal unders and low shot efficiency.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The home side shows a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 67% of matches (2 instances) and score an average of 0.67 goals by Half-Time compared to 0.25 for MP. Over the full match JäPS averages 0.67 goals scored and 1.33 conceded, while MP averages 0.5 scored and 1.25 conceded, indicating low efficiency from both teams but a slight offensive edge for the hosts. xG favors JäPS 1.4 to 1.27 and the hosts attempt more shots per match (12.33 vs 10.0), while in the last 5 fixtures JäPS won 4 of 5 (80%) and averaged 3.0 goals, whereas MP has only a 40% win rate in that period and conceded 2.4 goals on average. Considering the hosts frequently take a lead at the break (67%) and show markedly better recent form, the most likely scenario is maintenance of that lead through full-time (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
JäPSMP
11Shots14
JäPSMP
5Shots on target7
JäPSMP
1.55xG1.73
JäPSMP
7Corners5
JäPSMP
70Dangerous attacks49
JäPSMP
9Fouls8
JäPSMP
2Cards0
JäPSMP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.57
JäPSMP
0.86Goals conceded / match1.29
JäPSMP
42%Average possession52%
JäPSMP
3.57Shots on target / match4
JäPSMP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match11
JäPSMP
3.57Shots on target4
JäPSMP
12.5%Shot conversion5.2%
JäPSMP
42%Possession52%
JäPSMP
1.04xG for1.33
JäPSMP
1.56xG against1.27
JäPSMP

Shooting quality

JäPS: Counter-attackingMP: Balanced
JäPSMP
Accuracy (shots on target)45%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.14

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JäPS is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - JäPS · 1.2 pts / match - MP

JäPS
LWWWL
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
WWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
MP
LWWLL
Season result split
29% W0% R71% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-5
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JäPS is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - JäPS · 0.57 goals / match - MP

JäPS is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - JäPS · 1.29 goals / match - MP

JäPS scoring profile: strong

JäPS scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

MP scoring profile: more difficult

MP scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 matches).

7Goals scored (season)4
JäPSMP
6Goals conceded (season)9
JäPSMP
1.86Average goals in match1.86
JäPSMP
6Goals scored (last 5)4
JäPSMP
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
JäPSMP

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal57%
JäPSMP
29%2 goals0%
JäPSMP
14%3 goals0%
JäPSMP
0%4 goals0%
JäPSMP

How often they concede at least...

29%1 goal71%
JäPSMP
14%2 goals29%
JäPSMP
14%3 goals29%
JäPSMP
14%4 goals0%
JäPSMP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
JäPSMP
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JäPSMP
14%Scored in both halves0%
JäPSMP

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
JäPSMP
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JäPSMP
0%BTTS - last 540%
JäPSMP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
JäPSMP
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
JäPSMP
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JäPSMP

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time43%
JäPSMP
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
JäPSMP
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
JäPSMP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JäPS is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - JäPS · 1.57 pts / match - MP

JäPS - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing
MP - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.57
JäPSMP
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.43
JäPSMP
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
JäPSMP
0.71Average goals (1st half)0.71
JäPSMP
86%Clean sheet before half-time71%
JäPSMP
57%No goal before half-time57%
JäPSMP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.57
JäPSMP
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
JäPSMP
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)1
JäPSMP
1.14Average goals (2nd half)1.14
JäPSMP
71%Clean sheet after half-time57%
JäPSMP
71%No goal after half-time86%
JäPSMP

JäPS - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MP - second-half results

0% W57% R43% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JäPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.60
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
4
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
15%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.76
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JäPSLigaMP
Average goals in match 1.862.35 1.86
Both teams scored 0%41% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%41% 29%
Clean sheets 71%35% 29%
Goal before half-time 57%56% 71%
Goal after half-time 57%65% 43%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.35
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Aleksi SainioOff: Jesse Nikki
  2. MPSubstitutionOn: Eero YlönenOff: Santeri Stenius
  3. MPSubstitutionOn: Veikko KarttunenOff: Serge Atakayi
  4. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Charles KatashiraOff: Maliki Salomon
  5. JäPSYellow cardAleksi Sainio
  6. JäPSYellow cardRiku Selander
  7. MPSubstitutionOn: Santtu SeppänenOff: Akseli Tervaniemi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of JäPS vs MP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 0:2 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs MP?

JäPS score 1.00 goals per game on average and MP 0.57. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's matches and 29% of MP's.

What form are JäPS and MP in?

Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and MP 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs MP?

The statistical background for JäPS vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.