Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 07 September 2026

JäPS vs PK-35: match statistics

JäPS crest
JäPS
1 : 0half-time 1:0
PK-35 crest
PK-35

JäPS vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JäPS played PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

JäPS: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match. PK-35: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

JäPS scores 1.00 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. PK-35 scores 1.25 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JäPS 0%, PK-35 25%. Over 2.5: JäPS 50%, PK-35 25%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

PK-35 has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.05. JäPS: 7.8 shots per match, PK-35: 11.5.

Match halves

JäPS: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.25. PK-35: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

JäPS: 31-45+ (2 goals). PK-35: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.05 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1) because JäPS has a perfect home record: 100% wins and 100% clean sheets, averaging 2.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded per home match. JäPS is in strong form — 15 goals in the last 5 matches and 4 wins in those five fixtures (form 'wwlww'), yielding 2.4 points per game over that period. PK-35 generates more chances: on the road they average 21 shots and 7 on target with 48% possession, and their away xG is 2.39 versus JäPS’s 1.34 home xG. However, the visitors have a low conversion rate of 5% in away matches versus 19% for the hosts, meaning they score far fewer goals from a higher volume of chances. Considering JäPS’s flawless home statistics, superior recent form (4/5 wins) and significantly higher finishing efficiency, I assign JäPS a 55% probability, draw 20% and PK-35 win 25%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against BTTS is that PK-35 have a 100% clean sheets rate and 0% BTTS as visitors this season, while JäPS at home record BTTS in only 33% of matches, clearly favoring the 'No' scenario. Additionally, the league is characterized by a low BTTS rate (32%) and a very high clean sheets share (84%), which strengthens the 'No' option. Offensive data partly contradicts this — PK-35 generate 2.39 xG, 21.0 shots and 7.0 shots on target per game, but with a low conversion of 5%, while JäPS at home have only 1.09 xG and 3.67 shots on target, so the visitors create more chances but do not always convert them. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored more goals (JäPS 3.0 on average and 15 goals in 5 matches, PK-35 2.8 on average and 14 goals), however PK-35 conceded only 0.6 goals per game (3 conceded) versus JäPS 1.2 (6 conceded), which further argues for the visitors' defensive solidity. Overall, given PK-35's 100% clean sheets and 0% BTTS away and the league's 32% BTTS and 84% clean sheets, I assess BTTS probability at 30% versus 70% no goal from one side, and therefore recommend 'No' (No Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model projects 0.84 expected goals for JäPS and 2.00 for PK-35, totaling 2.84 goals. PK-35 averages 2.39 xG and 21 shots (7 on target) per match, while JäPS records 1.09 xG and 8.33 shots (3.67 on target); JäPS’s defense concedes 1.61 xG per game, giving the visitors a clear creative advantage. In their last 5 matches JäPS scored 15 goals (3.0 per game) and conceded 6 (1.2), while PK-35 scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) and conceded 3 (0.6), confirming both teams’ offensive form. Considering the combined 2.84 expected goals and PK-35’s superiority in xG and shots, I estimate the probability of Over 1.5 at about 88%, Over 2.5 at about 66%, and Over 3.5 at about 36%. The best line to play is Over 2.5 (side: Over), since the projected 2.84 goals and PK-35’s dominance in chance creation provide the strongest signal at this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

PK-35 holds a clear advantage in the data: away xG_for_avg of 2.39 versus JäPS’s 1.09, with an average of 21.0 shots and 7.0 on target compared to the hosts’ 8.33 shots and 3.67 on target. The visitors have led at the break in 100% of their matches and have not conceded this season (seasonConcededAVG_away 0.0, seasonCSPercentage_away 100.0), which strongly supports PK-35 leading at Half-Time. JäPS has a higher finishing efficiency (16.0% versus PK-35’s 5.0%) and averages 1.33 goals per match, but with far fewer attempts this does not offset the visitors’ dominance in xG and shot volume. Additionally, PK-35 averages 3.0 points per match versus the hosts’ 1.33, so the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
JäPSPK-35
7Shots10
JäPSPK-35
3Shots on target4
JäPSPK-35
0.87xG1.35
JäPSPK-35
2Corners8
JäPSPK-35
30Dangerous attacks61
JäPSPK-35
11Fouls15
JäPSPK-35
2Cards2
JäPSPK-35

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.25
JäPSPK-35
1.25Goals conceded / match0.75
JäPSPK-35
37%Average possession41%
JäPSPK-35
4Shots on target / match4.5
JäPSPK-35

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.75Shots per match11.5
JäPSPK-35
4Shots on target4.5
JäPSPK-35
12.9%Shot conversion10.9%
JäPSPK-35
37%Possession41%
JäPSPK-35
1.05xG for1.42
JäPSPK-35
1.45xG against1.36
JäPSPK-35

Shooting quality

JäPS: Counter-attackingPK-35: Balanced
JäPSPK-35
Accuracy (shots on target)52%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JäPS
DWLW
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
PK-35
WDWL
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PK-35 is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - JäPS · 1.25 goals / match - PK-35

PK-35 is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - JäPS · 0.75 goals / match - PK-35

JäPS scoring profile: mixed

JäPS scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

PK-35 scoring profile: more difficult

PK-35 scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 matches).

4Goals scored (season)5
JäPSPK-35
5Goals conceded (season)3
JäPSPK-35
2.25Average goals in match2
JäPSPK-35
4Goals scored (last 5)5
JäPSPK-35
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
JäPSPK-35

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
JäPSPK-35
25%2 goals25%
JäPSPK-35
25%3 goals25%
JäPSPK-35
0%4 goals25%
JäPSPK-35

How often they concede at least...

25%1 goal50%
JäPSPK-35
25%2 goals25%
JäPSPK-35
25%3 goals0%
JäPSPK-35
25%4 goals0%
JäPSPK-35

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
JäPSPK-35
0%BTTS in both halves25%
JäPSPK-35
25%Scored in both halves25%
JäPSPK-35

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
JäPSPK-35
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JäPSPK-35
0%BTTS - last 525%
JäPSPK-35

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
JäPSPK-35
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
JäPSPK-35
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
JäPSPK-35

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
JäPSPK-35
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
JäPSPK-35
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
JäPSPK-35

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / match - JäPS · 2 pts / match - PK-35

JäPS - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
PK-35 - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per match (1st half)2
JäPSPK-35
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.75
JäPSPK-35
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
JäPSPK-35
1Average goals (1st half)1
JäPSPK-35
75%Clean sheet before half-time75%
JäPSPK-35
50%No goal before half-time50%
JäPSPK-35

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.25
JäPSPK-35
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
JäPSPK-35
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
JäPSPK-35
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1
JäPSPK-35
75%Clean sheet after half-time50%
JäPSPK-35
75%No goal after half-time75%
JäPSPK-35

JäPS - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PK-35 - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JäPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.751.25
Goals scored / match0.80.3
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match1.01.3
1 goal75%50%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet75%75%
No goal50%75%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.25
Goals scored / match0.80.5
Goals conceded / match0.30.5
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal50%75%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
13%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JäPSLigaPK-35
Average goals in match 2.252.05 2.00
Both teams scored 0%32% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%42% 25%
Clean sheets 75%42% 50%
Goal before half-time 75%63% 50%
Goal after half-time 50%58% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.05
Average goals per match
32%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JäPSGoalRiku Selander
  2. JäPSYellow cardJesse Nikki
  3. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Veka KetonenOff: Oscar Dahlfors
  4. PK-35Yellow cardRafael Lehtonen
  5. JäPSYellow cardCharles Katashira
  6. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Impton SöderlundOff: Aleksi Ristola
  7. PK-35Yellow cardEino-Iivari Pitkälä

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): JäPS 0 - 1 - 2 PK-35. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Pallokerho-35 ry
0 : 0
Järvenpään Palloseura
Järvenpään Palloseura
1 : 4
Pallokerho-35 ry
Pallokerho-35 ry
1 : 0
Järvenpään Palloseura

FAQ

What was the result of JäPS vs PK-35?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 1:0 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between JäPS and PK-35?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches JäPS won 0, PK-35 won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs PK-35?

JäPS score 1.00 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.25. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's matches and 25% of PK-35's.

What form are JäPS and PK-35 in?

Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and PK-35 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs PK-35?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JäPS vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.