Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Jaro vs Lahti: match statistics

Jaro crest
Jaro
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Lahti crest
Lahti

Jaro vs Lahti: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jaro play Lahti in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Jaro: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Lahti: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jaro scores 0.94 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Lahti scores 1.25 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jaro 50%, Lahti 44%. Over 2.5: Jaro 56%, Lahti 31%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Lahti has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.42. Jaro: 11.7 shots per match, Lahti: 12.5.

Match halves

Jaro: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.25. Lahti: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Jaro: 16-30 (4 goals). Lahti: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

I back the home win (1): Jaro holds a slight advantage in league position and points — 5th vs 7th for Lahti, and an average of 1.8 points per match in the last 5 vs 1.4 for the visitors. Offensively the hosts are more efficient: 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 per match) versus Lahti’s 7 (1.4 per match). Defensively the edge goes to the visitors — Jaro conceded 14 goals in the last 5 (2.8 per match), while Lahti conceded only 6 (1.2 per match), which mitigates the hosts’ advantage. Recent form reflects a similar picture: Jaro 3 wins and 2 losses (W L L W W), Lahti 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses (W W D L L), so Jaro’s advantage is driven mainly by superior attacking output (11 vs 7), but the high number of goals conceded (14 vs 6) limits the extent of that advantage.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
JaroLahti
10Shots7
JaroLahti
3Shots on target2
JaroLahti
1.29xG0.77
JaroLahti
0Corners3
JaroLahti
61Dangerous attacks25
JaroLahti
13Fouls11
JaroLahti
3Cards1
JaroLahti

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.94Goals scored / match1.25
JaroLahti
2Goals conceded / match0.94
JaroLahti
46%Average possession55%
JaroLahti
4.38Shots on target / match4.31
JaroLahti

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.69Shots per match12.5
JaroLahti
4.38Shots on target4.31
JaroLahti
8%Shot conversion10%
JaroLahti
46%Possession55%
JaroLahti
1.42xG for1.43
JaroLahti
1.7xG against1.21
JaroLahti

Shooting quality

Jaro: BalancedLahti: Balanced
JaroLahti
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lahti is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Jaro · 2.2 pts / match - Lahti

Jaro
LDLWD
Season result split
13% W38% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-8
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 2.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Lahti
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lahti is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Jaro · 1.25 goals / match - Lahti

Lahti is 113% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Jaro · 0.94 goals / match - Lahti

Jaro scoring profile: mixed

Jaro scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).

Lahti scoring profile: very strong

Lahti scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

15Goals scored (season)20
JaroLahti
32Goals conceded (season)15
JaroLahti
2.94Average goals in match2.19
JaroLahti
5Goals scored (last 5)6
JaroLahti
10Goals conceded (last 5)1
JaroLahti

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal75%
JaroLahti
31%2 goals31%
JaroLahti
6%3 goals6%
JaroLahti
0%4 goals6%
JaroLahti

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal63%
JaroLahti
50%2 goals25%
JaroLahti
31%3 goals6%
JaroLahti
19%4 goals0%
JaroLahti

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
JaroLahti
6%BTTS in both halves6%
JaroLahti
13%Scored in both halves25%
JaroLahti

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
JaroLahti
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
JaroLahti
60%BTTS - last 520%
JaroLahti

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
JaroLahti
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
JaroLahti
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
JaroLahti

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
JaroLahti
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
JaroLahti
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
JaroLahti

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lahti is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Jaro · 1.56 pts / match - Lahti

Jaro - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing
Lahti - half-time state
38% leading44% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.56
JaroLahti
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.75
JaroLahti
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
JaroLahti
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.13
JaroLahti
44%Clean sheet before half-time69%
JaroLahti
56%No goal before half-time44%
JaroLahti

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per match (2nd half)1.19
JaroLahti
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
JaroLahti
1.19Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
JaroLahti
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.06
JaroLahti
38%Clean sheet after half-time56%
JaroLahti
75%No goal after half-time56%
JaroLahti

Jaro - second-half results

13% W31% R56% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding34%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lahti - second-half results

25% W44% R31% P
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
0
4
61-75
1
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
4
3
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
174%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

JaroLigaLahti
Average goals in match 2.942.67 2.19
Both teams scored 50%51% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%47% 31%
Clean sheets 19%28% 38%
Goal before half-time 81%75% 69%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Jaro vs Lahti?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 0:1 Lahti. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs Lahti?

Jaro score 0.94 goals per game on average and Lahti 1.25. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Jaro's matches and 44% of Lahti's.

What form are Jaro and Lahti in?

Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Lahti 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs Lahti?

The statistical background for Jaro vs Lahti — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.