Finland - VeikkausliigaJakobstads CentralplanData current as of 31 August 2026

Jaro vs Oulu: match statistics

Jaro crest
Jaro
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Oulu crest
Oulu

Jaro vs Oulu: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jaro played Oulu in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Jakobstads Centralplan. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Jaro: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Oulu: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jaro scores 0.90 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. Oulu scores 1.20 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jaro 50%, Oulu 45%. Over 2.5: Jaro 60%, Oulu 40%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Jaro has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.27. Jaro: 11.8 shots per match, Oulu: 10.9.

Match halves

Jaro: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.25. Oulu: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Jaro: 31-45+ (6 goals). Oulu: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Jaro have a poor overall season record, with just 3 wins and 41 goals conceded in 20 matches, but they look significantly more stable at home. The hosts average 1.4 goals scored at home with an xG of 1.44, while Oulu concede an average of 1.6 goals away and allow opponents an xG of 1.56. Oulu sit higher in the table and have won 9 matches this season compared with Jaro’s 3, but their away form is a problem: 50% of their away games have ended in defeat, and they score only 1.2 goals per match on the road. Both teams have identical records across their last five matches, with 1 win, 1 draw and 3 defeats, but Jaro register more shots on target per game at home, 4.9 compared with Oulu’s 3.8 away. Home advantage and the more favourable quality-of-chances profile give the hosts a slight edge, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as both teams have scored few goals in their last five matches: Jaro have averaged 0.6, while Oulu have averaged 0.8 goals per game. BTTS occurred in only 40% of matches for each team during this period, below the league average of 50%. Jaro have kept a clean sheet in 40% of their matches, and Oulu in 30%, while the hosts have failed to score in 20% of games and the visitors in 30%. Although Oulu’s defence concedes an average of 1.6 goals and gives Jaro a chance to score, the hosts are currently generating only 1.13 xG, compared with 1.14 xG for Oulu, so the real risk of one side failing to score is high. A BTTS - No scenario does not necessarily mean a goalless draw; rather, the most likely outcome is that at least one team will fail to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is the low share of matches with at least four goals: 90% of Jaro’s matches and 70% of Oulu’s matches finished with Under 3.5 goals. The hosts average 1.2 goals, while the visitors also average 1.2, although over their last five appearances these averages dropped to 0.6 and 0.8 goals, respectively. However, both teams are creating chances at a level of 1.22 xG for Jaro and 1.31 xG for Oulu, while the hosts’ recently weaker defense, conceding 1.8 goals per match over their last five fixtures, keeps the projection close to 2.5 goals. At the same time, neither side regularly scores a high number of goals: Jaro have not scored more than 2 goals in a single match, while Oulu have reached that mark in only 10% of their matches. Therefore, a scenario with a maximum of three goals has by far the highest probability.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Jaro win in the match, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their games, while Oulu were trailing at that stage in as many as 50%. Jaro concede just 0.2 goals per match before half-time and keep a clean sheet in the first half in 80% of their appearances, limiting the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. After the interval, the hosts score an average of 0.9 goals and win the second half in 60% of matches, earning 2.0 points per game in this period compared with Oulu’s 1.4. Across the season, Jaro have a 60% win rate and concede an average of 0.9 goals, while Oulu lose 50% of their matches and allow an average of 1.6 goals. Both teams’ recent form has been poor, with 0.8 points per game across their last five appearances, making a draw at half-time more likely than a quick, commanding lead for the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
JaroOulu
14Shots7
JaroOulu
6Shots on target3
JaroOulu
1.69xG0.97
JaroOulu
7Corners1
JaroOulu
53Dangerous attacks44
JaroOulu
17Fouls17
JaroOulu
2Cards3
JaroOulu

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.9Goals scored / match1.2
JaroOulu
2.05Goals conceded / match1.25
JaroOulu
45%Average possession46%
JaroOulu
4.05Shots on target / match3.85
JaroOulu

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.75Shots per match10.9
JaroOulu
4.05Shots on target3.85
JaroOulu
7.7%Shot conversion11%
JaroOulu
45%Possession46%
JaroOulu
1.38xG for1.27
JaroOulu
1.73xG against1.38
JaroOulu

Shooting quality

Jaro: BalancedOulu: Balanced
JaroOulu
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Jaro
DWLLL
Season result split
15% W30% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-11
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Oulu
LDWLL
Season result split
45% W15% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-8
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Oulu is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - Jaro · 1.2 goals / match - Oulu

Oulu is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.05 goals / match - Jaro · 1.25 goals / match - Oulu

Jaro scoring profile: mixed

Jaro scores in 55% of matches (11 of 20 matches), while Oulu keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 matches).

Oulu scoring profile: very strong

Oulu scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

18Goals scored (season)24
JaroOulu
41Goals conceded (season)25
JaroOulu
2.95Average goals in match2.45
JaroOulu
3Goals scored (last 5)4
JaroOulu
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
JaroOulu

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal75%
JaroOulu
30%2 goals30%
JaroOulu
5%3 goals5%
JaroOulu
0%4 goals5%
JaroOulu

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal65%
JaroOulu
55%2 goals30%
JaroOulu
35%3 goals20%
JaroOulu
15%4 goals5%
JaroOulu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time15%
JaroOulu
5%BTTS in both halves5%
JaroOulu
15%Scored in both halves15%
JaroOulu

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
JaroOulu
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
JaroOulu
40%BTTS - last 540%
JaroOulu

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
JaroOulu
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
JaroOulu
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
JaroOulu

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
JaroOulu
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
JaroOulu
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
JaroOulu

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jaro is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Jaro · 1.15 pts / match - Oulu

Jaro - half-time state
35% leading20% draw45% trailing
Oulu - half-time state
25% leading40% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.15
JaroOulu
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.45
JaroOulu
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
JaroOulu
1.55Average goals (1st half)1.15
JaroOulu
40%Clean sheet before half-time55%
JaroOulu
55%No goal before half-time65%
JaroOulu

After half-time (2nd half)

0.6Points per match (2nd half)1.7
JaroOulu
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
JaroOulu
1.15Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
JaroOulu
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.3
JaroOulu
30%Clean sheet after half-time65%
JaroOulu
75%No goal after half-time45%
JaroOulu

Jaro - second-half results

10% W30% R60% P
25
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding43%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Oulu - second-half results

45% W35% R20% P
23
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding180%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Oulu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
1
6
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Oulu
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
7
31-45
4
3
46-60
6
5
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
183%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Oulu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

JaroLigaOulu
Average goals in match 2.952.64 2.45
Both teams scored 50%50% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%48% 40%
Clean sheets 15%28% 35%
Goal before half-time 85%77% 65%
Goal after half-time 80%76% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. OuluYellow cardMarkus Arsalo
  2. JaroYellow cardAdam Vidjeskog
  3. JaroSubstitutionOn: Jim MyrevikOff: Aron Bjonbäck
  4. OuluSubstitutionOn: Julius PaananenOff: Markus Arsalo
  5. OuluYellow cardLamine Ghezali

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Jaro 2 - 0 - 2 Oulu. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Oulu
2 : 1
Jaro
FF Jaro
1 : 2
AC Oulu
AC Oulu
0 : 1
FF Jaro
FF Jaro
2 : 1
AC Oulu

FAQ

What was the result of Jaro vs Oulu?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 0:1 Oulu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and Oulu?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Jaro won 2, Oulu won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs Oulu?

Jaro score 0.90 goals per game on average and Oulu 1.20. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Jaro's matches and 45% of Oulu's.

What form are Jaro and Oulu in?

Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Oulu 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs Oulu?

The statistical background for Jaro vs Oulu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.