Latvia - 1. LigaRīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekssData current as of 13 November 2026

JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: match statistics

JDFS Alberts crest
JDFS Alberts
1 : 3half-time 1:1
Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU

JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JDFS Alberts played Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

JDFS Alberts: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

JDFS Alberts scores 2.05 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 4.30 and concedes 0.80. League average: 3.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JDFS Alberts 75%, Metta - LU 50%. Over 2.5: JDFS Alberts 65%, Metta - LU 85%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 3.02 vs 1.81. JDFS Alberts: 13.5 shots per match, Metta - LU: 19.9.

Match halves

JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20. Metta - LU: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 2.00.

Goals by minute

JDFS Alberts: 76-90+ (11 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (21 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Metta - LU lead the table and have a clearly superior overall season record: 16 wins, 3 draws and just 1 defeat, with 86 goals scored and 16 conceded. Away from home, the visitors average 2.8 goals per match, create chances worth 2.41 xG and register 8.14 shots on target, while JDFS Alberts allow opponents 1.34 xG at home. Metta’s defence looks more solid, as they concede just 0.8 goals per away game, keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches and have not lost any away fixture. However, the hosts are in good form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches, and score an average of 2.1 goals at home with 1.95 xG, so they should pose a genuine threat to the favourites. Nevertheless, the visitors’ advantage in chance creation, possession at 61% compared with 53%, and defensive quality points to a slightly higher probability of an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is strong, as the hosts average 5.8 goals and the visitors 2.8, while neither team has finished a league match without scoring. Their attacking potential is supported by xG: JDFS Alberts create an average of 3.45 xG, while Metta - LU produce 2.41, with their respective opponents allowing 0.62 and 0.93 xG. In their last five matches, the hosts scored 2.2 goals and conceded 1.0, whereas the visitors scored as many as 3.6 goals while conceding 1.2, which favours an exchange of goals. The risk to the pick comes from both teams’ 50% clean-sheet rates and a season BTTS rate of 50%, but the high current attacking output gives the edge to the scenario in which each side scores at least once.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of this match clearly favors goals: at least 2 goals were scored in 100% of JDFS Alberts’ matches and in 90% of Metta - LU’s fixtures. The 2.5 line also has strong support, having been surpassed in 90% and 80% of these teams’ matches respectively, compared with the league average of 71%. The hosts generate an average of 3.45 xG, while the visitors produce 2.41 xG; meanwhile, Metta have averaged as many as 3.6 goals per game across their last five appearances. Current form also confirms the attacking outlook, with JDFS’ last five matches producing 16 goals in total, compared with 24 goals for Metta. The safest edge lies with Over 1.5, as even with more conservative finishing, the data from both teams significantly reduces the risk of a match featuring no more than one goal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

JDFS Alberts were leading at the break in 9 of their last 10 matches, scoring an average of 3.5 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.1, which provides a very strong argument for the hosts holding the advantage in the first half. Metta - LU are also effective, but they average 1.0 goal before half-time away from home, while the hosts have kept a clean sheet at the break in 90% of their matches. Across the season, JDFS Alberts win 90% of their matches, score an average of 5.8 goals, and record an xG of 3.45 compared with 2.41 for the visitors. The hosts’ superiority is also evident in chance creation: they average 27 shots and 16 on target, while Metta record 18.71 and 8.14 respectively. The last five matches have been more evenly balanced, with the hosts leading at half-time in 60% of them and the visitors drawing at the break in 60%; therefore, a draw at half-time followed by a JDFS Alberts win remains a significant alternative, but 1/1 is the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
6Shots18
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
3Shots on target7
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
1xG2.24
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
2Corners11
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
55Dangerous attacks87
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
11Fouls9
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
0Cards0
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
2.05Goals scored / match4.3
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
1.4Goals conceded / match0.8
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
54%Average possession51%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
5.7Shots on target / match10.7
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match19.9
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
5.7Shots on target10.7
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
15.2%Shot conversion21.6%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
54%Possession51%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
1.81xG for3.02
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
1.23xG against0.75
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

Shooting quality

JDFS Alberts: Efficient finishingMetta - LU: Attacking
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
Accuracy (shots on target)42%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 8% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - JDFS Alberts · 2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU

JDFS Alberts
WWWWL
Season result split
55% W20% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-5
1.85 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Metta - LU
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
80% W15% D5% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-3-1
2.55 pts / match · goal difference +70
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 5.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 3.55Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 110% better for: goals scored per match.

2.05 goals / match - JDFS Alberts · 4.3 goals / match - Metta - LU

Metta - LU is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - JDFS Alberts · 0.8 goals / match - Metta - LU

JDFS Alberts scoring profile: strong

JDFS Alberts scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 matches).

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (20 of 20 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

41Goals scored (season)86
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
28Goals conceded (season)16
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
3.45Average goals in match5.1
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
11Goals scored (last 5)29
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal100%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
55%2 goals90%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
35%3 goals65%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
15%4 goals45%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal50%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
40%2 goals25%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
10%3 goals5%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
10%4 goals0%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time15%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
5%BTTS in both halves0%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
30%Scored in both halves65%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS35%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
60%BTTS - last 540%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time55%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - JDFS Alberts · 2.45 pts / match - Metta - LU

JDFS Alberts - half-time state
40% leading35% draw25% trailing
Metta - LU - half-time state
75% leading20% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)2.45
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
0.85Goals scored (1st half)2.2
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
1.45Average goals (1st half)2.4
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
60%Clean sheet before half-time80%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
50%No goal before half-time25%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)2.15
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)2
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
2Average goals (2nd half)2.5
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
35%Clean sheet after half-time65%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU
30%No goal after half-time15%
JDFS AlbertsMetta - LU

JDFS Alberts - second-half results

45% W30% D25% L
31
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Metta - LU - second-half results

65% W20% D15% L
49
Half-time points
44
Half-time goals
+40
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+30
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding107%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JDFS Alberts - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.40
Goals scored / match2.83.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match3.23.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals60%60%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+12+14
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 14

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JDFS Alberts
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
9
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
4
7
46-60
9
7
61-75
11
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
13
2
0-15
12
2
16-30
21
2
31-45
13
6
46-60
12
1
61-75
15
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (21 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 2.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
90%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JDFS Alberts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
256%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

JDFS AlbertsLigaMetta - LU
Average goals in match▼ 3.453.75▲ 5.10
Both teams scored▲ 75%65%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 65%71%▲ 85%
Clean sheets• 20%19%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 70%77%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time• 85%84%▲ 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.75
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
2.07
Home goals / match
1.68
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Kārlis PirktiņšA 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JDFS AlbertsAssistKārlis Pirktiņš
  2. Metta - LUGoalKevins Cēsnieks

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: JDFS Alberts 0 - 0 - 1 Metta - LU. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?

The 1. Liga match finished JDFS Alberts 1:3 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?

JDFS Alberts score 2.05 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.30. The 1. Liga average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 75% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 50% of Metta - LU's.

What form are JDFS Alberts and Metta - LU in?

Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.