JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JDFS Alberts play Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 19 September 2026. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss.
Current form
JDFS Alberts: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
JDFS Alberts scores 2.05 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 4.30 and concedes 0.80. League average: 3.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JDFS Alberts 75%, Metta - LU 50%. Over 2.5: JDFS Alberts 65%, Metta - LU 85%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 71%.
xG, shots and style
Metta - LU has higher xG: 3.02 vs 1.81. JDFS Alberts: 13.5 shots per match, Metta - LU: 19.9.
Match halves
JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20. Metta - LU: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 2.00.
Goals by minute
JDFS Alberts: 76-90+ (11 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (21 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.73 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 71%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JDFS Alberts | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 54% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Metta - LU is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - JDFS Alberts · 2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 110% better for: goals scored per match.
2.05 goals / match - JDFS Alberts · 4.3 goals / match - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - JDFS Alberts · 0.8 goals / match - Metta - LU
JDFS Alberts scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 matches).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (20 of 20 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
Over / Under - Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / match - JDFS Alberts · 2.45 pts / match - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +12 | +14 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (21 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JDFS Alberts
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JDFS Alberts | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.45 | 3.73 | ▲ 5.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 65% | 71% | ▲ 85% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 19% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: JDFS Alberts 0 - 0 - 1 Metta - LU. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do JDFS Alberts and Metta - LU play?
JDFS Alberts face Metta - LU on 19 September 2026 in 1. Liga at Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?
JDFS Alberts score 2.05 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.30. The 1. Liga average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 75% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 50% of Metta - LU's.
What form are JDFS Alberts and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.