JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JDFS Alberts play Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 8 August 2026. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss.
Current form
JDFS Alberts: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Riga FC II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
JDFS Alberts scores 2.00 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.53 and concedes 1.87. League average: 3.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JDFS Alberts 80%, Riga FC II 60%. Over 2.5: JDFS Alberts 67%, Riga FC II 73%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.
xG, shots and style
JDFS Alberts has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.30. JDFS Alberts: 13.9 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.1.
Match halves
JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.27. Riga FC II: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
JDFS Alberts: 76-90+ (9 goals). Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.49 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JDFS Alberts | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 54% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Riga FC II is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - JDFS Alberts · 2 pts / match - Riga FC II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JDFS Alberts is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - JDFS Alberts · 1.53 goals / match - Riga FC II
JDFS Alberts is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.53 goals / match - JDFS Alberts · 1.87 goals / match - Riga FC II
JDFS Alberts scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
Riga FC II scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — JDFS Alberts
Over / Under — Riga FC II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga FC II is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - JDFS Alberts · 1.53 pts / match - Riga FC II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Riga FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JDFS Alberts
Riga FC II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JDFS Alberts | Liga | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.53 | 3.49 | • 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 63% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 21% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 85% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): JDFS Alberts 2 - 0 - 1 Riga FC II. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
When do JDFS Alberts and Riga FC II play?
JDFS Alberts face Riga FC II on 8 August 2026 in 1. Liga at Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between JDFS Alberts and Riga FC II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches JDFS Alberts won 2, Riga FC II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II?
JDFS Alberts score 2.00 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.53. The 1. Liga average is 3.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 80% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 60% of Riga FC II's.
What form are JDFS Alberts and Riga FC II in?
Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Riga FC II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.