JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JDFS Alberts play Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 25 July 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss.
Current form
JDFS Alberts: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Super Nova II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
JDFS Alberts scores 2.15 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Super Nova II scores 1.54 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JDFS Alberts 77%, Super Nova II 69%. Over 2.5: JDFS Alberts 77%, Super Nova II 46%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
JDFS Alberts has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.19. JDFS Alberts: 14.4 shots per match, Super Nova II: 7.9.
Match halves
JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.38. Super Nova II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
JDFS Alberts: 61-75 (8 goals). Super Nova II: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JDFS Alberts | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JDFS Alberts is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - JDFS Alberts · 1 pts / match - Super Nova II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JDFS Alberts is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
2.15 goals / match - JDFS Alberts · 1.54 goals / match - Super Nova II
Super Nova II is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.62 goals / match - JDFS Alberts · 1.46 goals / match - Super Nova II
JDFS Alberts scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Super Nova II scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — JDFS Alberts
Over / Under — Super Nova II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Super Nova II is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / match - JDFS Alberts · 1.62 pts / match - Super Nova II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JDFS Alberts
Super Nova II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JDFS Alberts | Liga | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.77 | 3.43 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 77% | 60% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 77% | 68% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 23% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 71% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: JDFS Alberts 0 - 0 - 1 Super Nova II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do JDFS Alberts and Super Nova II play?
JDFS Alberts face Super Nova II on 25 July 2026 in 1. Liga at Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II?
JDFS Alberts score 2.15 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.54. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 77% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 69% of Super Nova II's.
What form are JDFS Alberts and Super Nova II in?
Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Super Nova II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II?
The statistical background for JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.