Japan - J1 LeagueFukuda Denshi ArenaData current as of 31 August 2026

JEF United vs Fagiano Okayama: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

JEF United vs Fagiano Okayama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JEF United play Fagiano Okayama in J1 League (Japan). The match date is 2 September 2026. Venue: Fukuda Denshi Arena.

Current form

JEF United: 0-0-4, 0.00 points/match. Fagiano Okayama: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

JEF United scores 0.50 and concedes 3.25 goals per match. Fagiano Okayama scores 0.75 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JEF United 25%, Fagiano Okayama 50%. Over 2.5: JEF United 75%, Fagiano Okayama 50%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Fagiano Okayama has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.10. JEF United: 10.3 shots per match, Fagiano Okayama: 17.8.

Match halves

JEF United: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Fagiano Okayama: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

JEF United: 16-30 (1 goals). Fagiano Okayama: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J1 League: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
0.5Goals scored / match0.75
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
3.25Goals conceded / match1
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
48%Average possession46%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
3.75Shots on target / match3
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.25Shots per match17.75
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
3.75Shots on target3
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
4.9%Shot conversion4.2%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
48%Possession46%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
1.1xG for1.76
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
1.98xG against0.83
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

Shooting quality

JEF United: BalancedFagiano Okayama: Attacking
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
Accuracy (shots on target)37%17%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.130.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JEF United
LLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 3.3xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 75%
Fagiano Okayama
LWDL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 0.83BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fagiano Okayama is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

0.5 goals / match - JEF United · 0.75 goals / match - Fagiano Okayama

Fagiano Okayama is 225% better for: goals conceded per match.

3.25 goals / match - JEF United · 1 goals / match - Fagiano Okayama

JEF United scoring profile: more difficult

JEF United scores in 25% of matches (1 of 4 matches), while Fagiano Okayama keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Fagiano Okayama scoring profile: very strong

Fagiano Okayama scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while JEF United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

2Goals scored (season)3
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
13Goals conceded (season)4
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
3.75Average goals in match1.75
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
2Goals scored (last 5)3
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
13Goals conceded (last 5)4
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

How often they score at least...

25%1 goal75%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
25%2 goals0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
0%3 goals0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
0%4 goals0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
100%2 goals50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
75%3 goals0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
50%4 goals0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
0%Scored in both halves0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
25%BTTS - last 550%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fagiano Okayama is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.25 pts / match - JEF United · 0.75 pts / match - Fagiano Okayama

JEF United - half-time state
0% leading25% draw75% trailing
Fagiano Okayama - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.25Points per match (1st half)0.75
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
1.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
2.25Average goals (1st half)1.25
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
75%No goal before half-time50%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

After half-time (2nd half)

0.25Points per match (2nd half)1.25
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
1.5Average goals (2nd half)0.5
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
25%Clean sheet after half-time75%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama
100%No goal after half-time75%
JEF UnitedFagiano Okayama

JEF United - second-half results

0% W25% R75% P
1
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.25
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fagiano Okayama - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JEF United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.250.25
Goals scored / match0.50.0
Goals conceded / match1.81.5
Average goals in match2.31.5
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%75%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet25%25%
No goal75%100%
Goal difference-5-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 25% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 25% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fagiano Okayama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.751.25
Goals scored / match0.50.3
Goals conceded / match0.80.3
Average goals in match1.30.5
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal50%75%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 75% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JEF United
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
4
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Fagiano Okayama
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
19%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JEF United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.88
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
32%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
220%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Fagiano Okayama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.93
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
51%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

JEF UnitedLigaFagiano Okayama
Average goals in match 3.753.05 1.75
Both teams scored 25%60% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%60% 50%
Clean sheets 0%23% 50%
Goal before half-time 75%78% 50%
Goal after half-time 75%80% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

When do JEF United and Fagiano Okayama play?

JEF United face Fagiano Okayama on 2 September 2026 in J1 League at Fukuda Denshi Arena. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before JEF United vs Fagiano Okayama?

JEF United score 0.50 goals per game on average and Fagiano Okayama 0.75. The J1 League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 25% of JEF United's matches and 50% of Fagiano Okayama's.

What form are JEF United and Fagiano Okayama in?

Over the last 5 games JEF United have a 0-0-4 record (0.00 points per game) and Fagiano Okayama 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JEF United vs Fagiano Okayama?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.