Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 12 September 2026

Jesenice vs Triglav: match statistics

Jesenice crest
Jesenice
0 : 3half-time 0:1
Triglav crest
Triglav

Jesenice vs Triglav: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jesenice played Triglav in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 30 April 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Jesenice: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Triglav: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jesenice scores 0.88 and concedes 2.36 goals per match. Triglav scores 2.60 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.81 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jesenice 44%, Triglav 40%. Over 2.5: Jesenice 56%, Triglav 60%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Triglav has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.18. Jesenice: 8.8 shots per match, Triglav: 15.0.

Match halves

Jesenice: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.52. Triglav: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.40.

Goals by minute

Jesenice: 76-90+ (8 goals). Triglav: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (Triglav). Jesenice concedes on average 2.08 goals per home match and scores only 0.92, while Triglav averages 2.17 goals scored away and concedes about 1 goal per game. In their last 5 matches the hosts have scored just 2 goals and have a record of 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, whereas the visitors have won 5 of 5 recent games, scoring 11 and conceding 1. The difference in chance quality is clear: average xG is 1.77 for Triglav versus 1.31 for Jesenice, average shots 14 vs 10.58 and conversion rate 15% vs 9%. Additionally, Triglav have 58% of away matches with clean sheets, while Jesenice have only 17% clean sheets at home, which together with the possession advantage (59% vs 49%) favors the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Analysis of the last 5 matches shows a clear advantage for Triglav: in their last 5 fixtures Triglav scored 11 and conceded 1 (avg. 2.2 scored and 0.2 conceded), while Jesenice scored 2 and conceded 15 (0.4 scored and 3.0 conceded). Season-long figures confirm Triglav more often closes matches with a clean sheet — 58% clean sheets and season BTTS at 33%, while Jesenice has season BTTS 46% with 22 scored and 59 conceded. Although season xG for Jesenice is 2.12 versus Triglav’s 1.77, Jesenice’s xG over the last 5 dropped to 0.99 versus Triglav’s 1.86, and Jesenice registers higher xG against (1.96 vs 1.22). Given Triglav’s 58% clean sheets, their recent 0.2 goals conceded and Jesenice’s very low 0.4 average goals scored in the last 5, the “No” (no BTTS) scenario looks stronger, hence a 70% vs 30% rating for BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG and shot-stat based model yields expected goals of 1.75 for Jesenice and 1.49 for Triglav, totaling 3.24 goals. This aligns with high shares of matches >1.5: Jesenice has 92% such games and Triglav 75%. Additionally, Jesenice averages 6.69 shots on target at 19% conversion, Triglav 5.17 shots on target at 15%, and in the last 5 matches Triglav scored 11 goals versus Jesenice’s 2, indicating the opponent’s attacking form. A Poisson distribution for a sum of 3.24 implies ~83% probability for Over 1.5 and ~63% for Over 2.5, confirming that the safest and strongest signal is Over. Therefore I recommend an Over on the 1.5 line as the best pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Triglav are in excellent form: they have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100% in the last 5) and have a season win rate of 75% versus Jesenice’s 62%. Jesenice, on the other hand, have not won in their last five fixtures (0%), averaging 0.4 goals scored and 3.0 conceded per match. At Half-Time a draw is most common — both teams were level at the break in 60% of their last 5 matches (60% both), so HT as a draw is a strong signal. Despite the home side’s higher xG (2.12 vs 1.77 for the visitors), Triglav keep a clean sheet in 58% of matches and in second halves over the last 5 games they averaged 3.0 points, winning those periods 100% of the time (seasonCSPercentage_away=58, last5_ppg_2hg_overall_away=3.0, last5_wins_2hg_percentage_overall_away=100). Therefore the most likely HT/FT scenario is draw at half-time and away win (X/2) — I assign it ~35%; other realistic outcomes are 2/2 (~20%) and X/X (~15%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
JeseniceTriglav
5Shots8
JeseniceTriglav
2Shots on target6
JeseniceTriglav
1.01xG1.53
JeseniceTriglav
3Corners7
JeseniceTriglav
74Dangerous attacks81
JeseniceTriglav
13Fouls17
JeseniceTriglav
0Cards0
JeseniceTriglav

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.88Goals scored / match2.6
JeseniceTriglav
2.36Goals conceded / match0.92
JeseniceTriglav
46%Average possession58%
JeseniceTriglav
3.48Shots on target / match5.96
JeseniceTriglav

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.84Shots per match15
JeseniceTriglav
3.48Shots on target5.96
JeseniceTriglav
10%Shot conversion17.3%
JeseniceTriglav
46%Possession58%
JeseniceTriglav
1.18xG for1.95
JeseniceTriglav
1.98xG against1.29
JeseniceTriglav

Shooting quality

Jesenice: BalancedTriglav: Dominant
JeseniceTriglav
Accuracy (shots on target)39%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Triglav is 1400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Jesenice · 3 pts / match - Triglav

Jesenice
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
12% W24% D64% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-16
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-8
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Triglav
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
68% W12% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-3-5
2.16 pts / match · goal difference +42
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-1-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Triglav is 195% better for: goals scored per match.

0.88 goals / match - Jesenice · 2.6 goals / match - Triglav

Triglav is 157% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.36 goals / match - Jesenice · 0.92 goals / match - Triglav

Jesenice scoring profile: mixed

Jesenice scores in 56% of matches (14 of 25 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 48% (12 of 25 matches).

Triglav scoring profile: very strong

Triglav scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Jesenice keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).

22Goals scored (season)65
JeseniceTriglav
59Goals conceded (season)23
JeseniceTriglav
3.24Average goals in match3.52
JeseniceTriglav
2Goals scored (last 5)11
JeseniceTriglav
15Goals conceded (last 5)1
JeseniceTriglav

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal84%
JeseniceTriglav
24%2 goals68%
JeseniceTriglav
4%3 goals44%
JeseniceTriglav
4%4 goals32%
JeseniceTriglav

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal52%
JeseniceTriglav
68%2 goals28%
JeseniceTriglav
36%3 goals8%
JeseniceTriglav
20%4 goals4%
JeseniceTriglav

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time24%
JeseniceTriglav
4%BTTS in both halves8%
JeseniceTriglav
16%Scored in both halves56%
JeseniceTriglav

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
JeseniceTriglav
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS24%
JeseniceTriglav
40%BTTS - last 520%
JeseniceTriglav

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
JeseniceTriglav
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
JeseniceTriglav
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
JeseniceTriglav

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
JeseniceTriglav
68%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
JeseniceTriglav
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
JeseniceTriglav

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Triglav is 130% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Jesenice · 1.84 pts / match - Triglav

Jesenice - half-time state
12% leading44% draw44% trailing
Triglav - half-time state
52% leading28% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1.84
JeseniceTriglav
0.36Goals scored (1st half)1.2
JeseniceTriglav
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
JeseniceTriglav
1.2Average goals (1st half)1.72
JeseniceTriglav
44%Clean sheet before half-time60%
JeseniceTriglav
68%No goal before half-time32%
JeseniceTriglav

After half-time (2nd half)

0.76Points per match (2nd half)2.04
JeseniceTriglav
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
JeseniceTriglav
1.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
JeseniceTriglav
2.04Average goals (2nd half)1.8
JeseniceTriglav
32%Clean sheet after half-time64%
JeseniceTriglav
60%No goal after half-time28%
JeseniceTriglav

Jesenice - second-half results

16% W28% D56% L
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-25
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Triglav - second-half results

64% W12% D24% L
46
Half-time points
30
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+25
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jesenice - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-4-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Triglav - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.803.00
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jesenice
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
10
31-45
2
12
46-60
3
11
61-75
8
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Triglav
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
13
8
16-30
12
3
31-45
8
3
46-60
13
1
61-75
14
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 2.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+78%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jesenice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.80
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
186%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Triglav

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
205%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

JeseniceLigaTriglav
Average goals in match 3.242.81 3.52
Both teams scored 44%50% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%54% 60%
Clean sheets 20%29% 48%
Goal before half-time 68%74% 84%
Goal after half-time 84%80% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.81
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TriglavGoalNermin Hodžić
  2. TriglavGoalEdvin Lukaceviv
  3. TriglavGoalToni Vinogradac

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Jesenice 0 - 0 - 1 Triglav. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

NK Triglav Kranj
6 : 0
NK Jesenice

FAQ

What was the result of Jesenice vs Triglav?

The 2. SNL match finished Jesenice 0:3 Triglav. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Jesenice vs Triglav?

Jesenice score 0.88 goals per game on average and Triglav 2.60. The 2. SNL average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Jesenice's matches and 40% of Triglav's.

What form are Jesenice and Triglav in?

Over the last 5 games Jesenice have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Triglav 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jesenice vs Triglav?

The statistical background for Jesenice vs Triglav — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.