JFK Ventspils vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics
JFK Ventspils vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JFK Ventspils played Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
JFK Ventspils: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Rīgas FS II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
JFK Ventspils scores 1.60 and concedes 2.60 goals per match. Rīgas FS II scores 1.00 and concedes 3.00. League average: 3.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JFK Ventspils 80%, Rīgas FS II 60%. Over 2.5: JFK Ventspils 80%, Rīgas FS II 80%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 75%.
xG, shots and style
JFK Ventspils has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.30. JFK Ventspils: 6.8 shots per match, Rīgas FS II: 9.0.
Match halves
JFK Ventspils: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20. Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.20.
Goals by minute
JFK Ventspils: 76-90+ (4 goals). Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.72 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 75%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JFK Ventspils holds a slight edge: at home they average 1.0 goal per match (8 goals this season, 8 in the last 5), while Rīgas FS II have 5 goals in the whole season but average 0.0 goals away and have failed to score in 100% of their away matches. Defensively the hosts concede 1.5 goals per home match with average xG against of 1.31, whereas the visitors concede 2.0 goals on the road and register a higher xG against of 1.65, indicating greater defensive vulnerability for Rīgas FS II. In attack the created chances are comparable — average xG for is 1.21 for the hosts and 1.24 for the visitors — but Ventspils converts better: the hosts have a 17% conversion rate at home, while the visitors have 0% on the road, despite taking more shots (10 vs 6) and both averaging 3 shots on target per match. Over the last 5 matches the hosts are 0-2-3 averaging 0.4 points per game, while the visitors are 0-1-4 averaging 0.2 points per game, so both teams are poor point-collectors, but Ventspils demonstrates superior efficiency in chance conversion. Given the higher conversion (17% vs 0%), lower average goals conceded per match (1.5 vs 2.0) and the fact that the visitors have yet to score away, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
JFK Ventspils has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Rīgas FS II has 60% BTTS in the last 5, and the league BTTS rate is 62%, which together favors a both teams to score scenario. Both teams concede frequently: hosts average 3.25 goals conceded this season (2.6 in the last 5), visitors 2.0 this season (3.0 in the last 5), so the risk of goals from both sides is high. xG in the last 5 matches is 1.5 for the hosts and 1.3 for the guests, with xG against of 1.49 and 2.21, and shot counts (8.75 vs 10.0) and shots on target (4.25 vs 3.0) indicate both sides create chances. Additionally, Ventspils has 100% of home matches over 2.5 goals and 75% of matches combining over 2.5 goals and BTTS, which strengthens the BTTS signal. Based on this, I tip BTTS 'Yes' with a probability of 78% versus 22% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model indicates 1.32 xG for JFK Ventspils and 1.24 xG for Rīgas FS II, totaling 2.56 xG, which places the match just above the 2.5 threshold. In the last 5 matches both sides have been high-scoring: JFK averaged 4.2 goals per game (8 scored and 13 conceded in the last 5), and Rīgas averaged 4.0 goals per game (5 scored and 15 conceded in the last 5). The league averages 3.68 goals per game and 74% of fixtures exceed 2.5, additionally both teams had an 80% Over 2.5 rate in their last 5 matches, which strengthens the signal for the over. Defensively JFK concedes 3.25 goals per game on average (seasonConcededAVG_home = 3.25) and has xG against of 2.36, while Rīgas concedes 2.00 goals per game and has xG against of 1.65, so the propensity to concede is clear. Given the 100% participation of both teams in season matches over 1.5 goals and xG_total of 2.56, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts lead at the break in 75% of matches (3 of 4 in available data) and average 1.0 goals by half-time with 0.25 conceded, which strongly favors them in the first half. This is supported by a slightly higher xG for the hosts (1.32 vs. 1.24 for the visitors) and more on-target shots (4.25 vs. 3.0), explaining the half-time advantage. At the same time the hosts lose 75% of matches and have not recorded a win (75% losses; 0% wins), and after the break they concede an average of 3.0 goals while scoring only 0.25, which strongly indicates a turnaround in the second half. Therefore the primary scenario is the hosts leading at half-time but losing on Full-Time (1/2 — 45%), with alternatives being a draw after the hosts' half-time lead (1/X — 19%) or holding the lead (1/1 — 11%). Scenarios starting with a draw were given negligible weight (X/* = 0% in this model due to 0% half-time draws for the hosts), and situations with the visitors leading at the break (25% of cases) were mostly allocated to 2/2 (18%) and 2/X (5%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JFK Ventspils | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 53% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JFK Ventspils is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - JFK Ventspils · 0.2 pts / match - Rīgas FS II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JFK Ventspils is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
1.6 goals / match - JFK Ventspils · 1 goals / match - Rīgas FS II
JFK Ventspils is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.6 goals / match - JFK Ventspils · 3 goals / match - Rīgas FS II
JFK Ventspils scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).
Rīgas FS II scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JFK Ventspils
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS II is 233% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.6 pts / match - JFK Ventspils · 2 pts / match - Rīgas FS II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JFK Ventspils - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 2.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 2.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -13 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JFK Ventspils
Rīgas FS II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JFK Ventspils | Liga | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.20 | 3.72 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 64% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 75% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): JFK Ventspils 0 - 1 - 1 Rīgas FS II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of JFK Ventspils vs Rīgas FS II?
The 1. Liga match finished JFK Ventspils 0:0 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JFK Ventspils and Rīgas FS II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches JFK Ventspils won 0, Rīgas FS II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JFK Ventspils vs Rīgas FS II?
JFK Ventspils score 1.60 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 75% of games. Both teams score in 80% of JFK Ventspils's matches and 60% of Rīgas FS II's.
What form are JFK Ventspils and Rīgas FS II in?
Over the last 5 games JFK Ventspils have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JFK Ventspils vs Rīgas FS II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JFK Ventspils vs Rīgas FS II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.