Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 07 September 2026

JIPPO vs KTP: match statistics

JIPPO crest
JIPPO
0 : 0half-time 0:0
KTP crest
KTP

JIPPO vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JIPPO played KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

JIPPO: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. KTP: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

JIPPO scores 1.00 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. KTP scores 1.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 2.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JIPPO 50%, KTP 0%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 50%, KTP 0%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.73. JIPPO: 16.0 shots per match, KTP: 15.0.

Match halves

JIPPO: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. KTP: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

JIPPO: 46-60 (1 goals). KTP: 61-75 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.11 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). JIPPO sits 3rd in the table and builds a clear home advantage: on average 16 shots and 5 shots on target per match and xG 1.89 versus xG against 0.49, indicating higher quality of created chances. KTP shows better short-term form (3 wins in last 5 and an average of 2 points per game) and more goals in the last five matches (7 vs 5), but their away metrics in the dataset are null (0 shots, 0 xG), which limits evidence of effectiveness on the road. Both teams conceded 6 goals in the last 5 matches, so I expect an open game with chances for both sides, but JIPPO’s superiority in chance creation (xG 1.89 and 65% possession for the home side) gives them the greater probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Key indicators favor BTTS: in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of games (JIPPO 80%, KTP 80%), which is a strong short-term signal. In those five fixtures JIPPO scored 5 goals (avg 1.0) and conceded 6 (1.2), while KTP scored 7 (1.4) and conceded 6 (1.2), meaning both teams score and concede roughly 1.0–1.4 goals per match. Additionally recent xG is 1.61 for JIPPO and 1.31 for KTP, with xG against 1.12 and 0.80, so both sides generate scoring opportunities and are exposed to conceded goals. Seasonal league stats are more conservative (league BTTS 44%, clean sheet percentage 78%), and the provided season-long team data are inconsistent, therefore I place greater weight on form (JIPPO: lddwl, KTP: dwwwl) and the last five matches. Considering the 80% BTTS in the last five matches for both teams, the average goal total 1.0+1.4=2.4 exceeding the league average 2.11, and positive xG, I assess BTTS probability at 72% vs 28% and recommend the bet "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on the last 5 matches, JIPPO has an average xG of 1.61 and KTP 1.31; average xG against is 1.12 for the home side and 0.80 for the away side. Averaging one team’s attack and the opponent’s defense yields 1.21 expected goals for JIPPO ((1.61+0.80)/2) and 1.22 for KTP ((1.31+1.12)/2), i.e., a combined 2.43 expected goals. The Poisson distribution for λ=2.43 gives roughly a 70% chance of more than 1.5 goals, about 44% for over 2.5 goals and around 23% for over 3.5 goals. Additionally, in the last 5 matches both teams exceeded 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, and both teams scored in 80% of fixtures; JIPPO also averages 15.0 shots and 6.0 shots on target with a seasonal xG of 1.9, which further supports a higher-goal outcome. Consequently, the strongest and safest signal from the available data is a play on Over 1.5, while the 2.5 line is close to a toss-up and offers lower betting value.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

JIPPO finished the first half level in 100% of home matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 100.0), so the most likely Half-Time outcome is a draw. At the same time, the hosts won the second half in 100% of cases (wins_2hg_percentage_home = 100.0), scoring on average 1.0 goals after the break (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0), which suggests a turnaround after half-time and a home win. The gap in quality of chances is significant: JIPPO has an xG of 1.9 per match versus KTP’s xG of 0.0 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.9 vs xg_for_avg_away = 0.0) and averages 15 shots and 6 on target per match compared to 0 shots for the away side (shotsAVG_home = 15.0, shotsOnTargetAVG_home = 6.0). Nevertheless, the league features a high clean sheet rate of 78% and a low average goals figure of 2.11 (league_seasonCSPercentage = 78.0, league_seasonAVG_overall = 2.11), so a full-time draw cannot be completely ruled out. On this basis the strongest signal is a Half-Time draw and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
JIPPOKTP
9Shots12
JIPPOKTP
4Shots on target1
JIPPOKTP
1.35xG1.26
JIPPOKTP
5Corners3
JIPPOKTP
69Dangerous attacks61
JIPPOKTP
4Fouls7
JIPPOKTP
1Cards2
JIPPOKTP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1
JIPPOKTP
0.5Goals conceded / match0
JIPPOKTP
61%Average possession57%
JIPPOKTP
3.5Shots on target / match6
JIPPOKTP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16Shots per match15
JIPPOKTP
3.5Shots on target6
JIPPOKTP
6.3%Shot conversion6.7%
JIPPOKTP
61%Possession57%
JIPPOKTP
1.73xG for1.9
JIPPOKTP
0.92xG against0.57
JIPPOKTP

Shooting quality

JIPPO: DominantKTP: Dominant
JIPPOKTP
Accuracy (shots on target)22%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - JIPPO · 3 pts / match - KTP

JIPPO
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
KTP
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 0.57BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO scoring profile: more difficult

JIPPO scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

2Goals scored (season)1
JIPPOKTP
1Goals conceded (season)0
JIPPOKTP
1.5Average goals in match1
JIPPOKTP
2Goals scored (last 5)1
JIPPOKTP
1Goals conceded (last 5)0
JIPPOKTP

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
JIPPOKTP
50%2 goals0%
JIPPOKTP
0%3 goals0%
JIPPOKTP
0%4 goals0%
JIPPOKTP

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal0%
JIPPOKTP
0%2 goals0%
JIPPOKTP
0%3 goals0%
JIPPOKTP
0%4 goals0%
JIPPOKTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
JIPPOKTP
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Scored in both halves0%
JIPPOKTP

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JIPPOKTP
50%BTTS - last 50%
JIPPOKTP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JIPPOKTP

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
JIPPOKTP
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
JIPPOKTP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - JIPPO · 1 pts / match - KTP

JIPPO - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
KTP - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)1
JIPPOKTP
0Goals scored (1st half)0
JIPPOKTP
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
JIPPOKTP
0.5Average goals (1st half)0
JIPPOKTP
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
JIPPOKTP
100%No goal before half-time100%
JIPPOKTP

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)3
JIPPOKTP
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
JIPPOKTP
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
JIPPOKTP
1Average goals (2nd half)1
JIPPOKTP
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
JIPPOKTP
50%No goal after half-time0%
JIPPOKTP

JIPPO - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KTP - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.502.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match0.51.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.01.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

KTP
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
59%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.90
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JIPPOLigaKTP
Average goals in match 1.502.11 1.00
Both teams scored 50%44% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%44% 0%
Clean sheets 50%39% 100%
Goal before half-time 50%67% 0%
Goal after half-time 50%56% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.11
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPYellow cardDerrick Atta Agyei
  2. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Victor de PaulaOff: Valtteri Vesiaho
  3. KTPYellow cardNathaniel Tahmbi
  4. KTPSubstitutionOn: Atomu TanakaOff: Onni Hänninen
  5. JIPPOYellow cardPasi Forsman
  6. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Joona MalinenOff: Lassi Forss

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of JIPPO vs KTP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:0 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs KTP?

JIPPO score 1.00 goals per game on average and KTP 1.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of JIPPO's matches and 0% of KTP's.

What form are JIPPO and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and KTP 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs KTP?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.