JIPPO vs KTP: match statistics
JIPPO vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JIPPO played KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
JIPPO: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. KTP: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
JIPPO scores 1.00 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. KTP scores 1.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 2.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JIPPO 50%, KTP 0%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 50%, KTP 0%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.73. JIPPO: 16.0 shots per match, KTP: 15.0.
Match halves
JIPPO: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. KTP: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
JIPPO: 46-60 (1 goals). KTP: 61-75 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.11 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). JIPPO sits 3rd in the table and builds a clear home advantage: on average 16 shots and 5 shots on target per match and xG 1.89 versus xG against 0.49, indicating higher quality of created chances. KTP shows better short-term form (3 wins in last 5 and an average of 2 points per game) and more goals in the last five matches (7 vs 5), but their away metrics in the dataset are null (0 shots, 0 xG), which limits evidence of effectiveness on the road. Both teams conceded 6 goals in the last 5 matches, so I expect an open game with chances for both sides, but JIPPO’s superiority in chance creation (xG 1.89 and 65% possession for the home side) gives them the greater probability of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Key indicators favor BTTS: in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of games (JIPPO 80%, KTP 80%), which is a strong short-term signal. In those five fixtures JIPPO scored 5 goals (avg 1.0) and conceded 6 (1.2), while KTP scored 7 (1.4) and conceded 6 (1.2), meaning both teams score and concede roughly 1.0–1.4 goals per match. Additionally recent xG is 1.61 for JIPPO and 1.31 for KTP, with xG against 1.12 and 0.80, so both sides generate scoring opportunities and are exposed to conceded goals. Seasonal league stats are more conservative (league BTTS 44%, clean sheet percentage 78%), and the provided season-long team data are inconsistent, therefore I place greater weight on form (JIPPO: lddwl, KTP: dwwwl) and the last five matches. Considering the 80% BTTS in the last five matches for both teams, the average goal total 1.0+1.4=2.4 exceeding the league average 2.11, and positive xG, I assess BTTS probability at 72% vs 28% and recommend the bet "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on the last 5 matches, JIPPO has an average xG of 1.61 and KTP 1.31; average xG against is 1.12 for the home side and 0.80 for the away side. Averaging one team’s attack and the opponent’s defense yields 1.21 expected goals for JIPPO ((1.61+0.80)/2) and 1.22 for KTP ((1.31+1.12)/2), i.e., a combined 2.43 expected goals. The Poisson distribution for λ=2.43 gives roughly a 70% chance of more than 1.5 goals, about 44% for over 2.5 goals and around 23% for over 3.5 goals. Additionally, in the last 5 matches both teams exceeded 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, and both teams scored in 80% of fixtures; JIPPO also averages 15.0 shots and 6.0 shots on target with a seasonal xG of 1.9, which further supports a higher-goal outcome. Consequently, the strongest and safest signal from the available data is a play on Over 1.5, while the 2.5 line is close to a toss-up and offers lower betting value.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JIPPO finished the first half level in 100% of home matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 100.0), so the most likely Half-Time outcome is a draw. At the same time, the hosts won the second half in 100% of cases (wins_2hg_percentage_home = 100.0), scoring on average 1.0 goals after the break (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0), which suggests a turnaround after half-time and a home win. The gap in quality of chances is significant: JIPPO has an xG of 1.9 per match versus KTP’s xG of 0.0 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.9 vs xg_for_avg_away = 0.0) and averages 15 shots and 6 on target per match compared to 0 shots for the away side (shotsAVG_home = 15.0, shotsOnTargetAVG_home = 6.0). Nevertheless, the league features a high clean sheet rate of 78% and a low average goals figure of 2.11 (league_seasonCSPercentage = 78.0, league_seasonAVG_overall = 2.11), so a full-time draw cannot be completely ruled out. On this basis the strongest signal is a Half-Time draw and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JIPPO | KTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - JIPPO · 3 pts / match - KTP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JIPPO scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).
KTP scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JIPPO
Over / Under - KTP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / match - JIPPO · 1 pts / match - KTP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JIPPO - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
KTP - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.50 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JIPPO
KTP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JIPPO | Liga | KTP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.50 | 2.11 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of JIPPO vs KTP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:0 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs KTP?
JIPPO score 1.00 goals per game on average and KTP 1.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of JIPPO's matches and 0% of KTP's.
What form are JIPPO and KTP in?
Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and KTP 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs KTP?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


