JIPPO vs KTP: match statistics
JIPPO vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JIPPO play KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
JIPPO: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
JIPPO scores 1.47 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. KTP scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JIPPO 47%, KTP 40%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 40%, KTP 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.67. JIPPO: 13.6 shots per match, KTP: 15.3.
Match halves
JIPPO: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80. KTP: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07.
Goals by minute
JIPPO: 76-90+ (7 goals). KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I back the home win (1). JIPPO sits 3rd in the table and builds a clear home advantage: on average 16 shots and 5 shots on target per match and xG 1.89 versus xG against 0.49, indicating higher quality of created chances. KTP shows better short-term form (3 wins in last 5 and an average of 2 points per game) and more goals in the last five matches (7 vs 5), but their away metrics in the dataset are null (0 shots, 0 xG), which limits evidence of effectiveness on the road. Both teams conceded 6 goals in the last 5 matches, so I expect an open game with chances for both sides, but JIPPO’s superiority in chance creation (xG 1.89 and 65% possession for the home side) gives them the greater probability of victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JIPPO | KTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JIPPO is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - JIPPO · 2 pts / match - KTP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - JIPPO · 1.67 goals / match - KTP
JIPPO is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.73 goals / match - JIPPO · 1 goals / match - KTP
JIPPO scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
KTP scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — JIPPO
Over / Under — KTP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JIPPO is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - JIPPO · 1.33 pts / match - KTP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JIPPO
KTP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JIPPO | Liga | KTP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.47 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 73% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: JIPPO 0 - 1 - 0 KTP. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of JIPPO vs KTP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:0 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs KTP?
JIPPO score 1.47 goals per game on average and KTP 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 47% of JIPPO's matches and 40% of KTP's.
What form are JIPPO and KTP in?
Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and KTP 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs KTP?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.