JKT Tanzania vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JKT Tanzania played Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 26 November 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

JKT Tanzania: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Kitayosce: 1-3-0, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

JKT Tanzania scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 0.75 and concedes 0.50. League average: 1.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JKT Tanzania 86%, Kitayosce 25%. Over 2.5: JKT Tanzania 43%, Kitayosce 25%. League level: BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 23%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. JKT Tanzania: 9.3 shots per match, Kitayosce: 6.8.

Match halves

JKT Tanzania: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.14. Kitayosce: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

JKT Tanzania: 76-90+ (4 goals). Kitayosce: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.72 goals per match, BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 23%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
8Shots4
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1Shots on target0
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1xG0.57
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
6Corners2
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
58Dangerous attacks43
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
22Fouls29
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0Cards0
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.29Goals scored / match0.75
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.14Goals conceded / match0.5
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
52%Average possession40%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
3.29Shots on target / match2
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.29Shots per match6.75
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
3.29Shots on target2
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
13.8%Shot conversion11.1%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
52%Possession40%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.24xG for1.24
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.96xG against1.58
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Shooting quality

JKT Tanzania: Efficient finishingKitayosce: Balanced
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)35%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - JKT Tanzania · 1.5 pts / match - Kitayosce

JKT Tanzania
DDDLW
Season result split
29% W57% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-1
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
DDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Kitayosce
DDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W75% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-0
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-0
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JKT Tanzania is 72% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - JKT Tanzania · 0.75 goals / match - Kitayosce

Kitayosce is 128% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - JKT Tanzania · 0.5 goals / match - Kitayosce

JKT Tanzania scoring profile: strong

JKT Tanzania scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: strong

Kitayosce scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

9Goals scored (season)3
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
8Goals conceded (season)2
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
2.43Average goals in match1.25
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
6Goals scored (last 5)3
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
29%2 goals25%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%3 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%4 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal25%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
29%2 goals25%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%3 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%4 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

28%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
14%Scored in both halves0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
80%BTTS - last 525%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.57 pts / match - JKT Tanzania · 1 pts / match - Kitayosce

JKT Tanzania - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.57Points per match (1st half)1
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.14Goals scored (1st half)0
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.71Average goals (1st half)0
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
43%Clean sheet before half-time100%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
86%No goal before half-time100%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

2.29Points per match (2nd half)1.5
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.25
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
57%Clean sheet after half-time75%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%No goal after half-time50%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

JKT Tanzania - second-half results

71% W14% D14% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - second-half results

25% W75% D0% L
4
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JKT Tanzania - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.40
Goals scored / match0.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.50
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match0.01.3
1 goal0%50%
2 goals0%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet100%75%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 75% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JKT Tanzania
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JKT Tanzania

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
190%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
44%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

JKT TanzaniaLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match▲ 2.431.72▼ 1.25
Both teams scored▲ 86%28%▼ 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 43%23%▲ 25%
Clean sheets▼ 14%43%▲ 75%
Goal before half-time▲ 57%45%▼ 0%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%55%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.72
Average goals per match
28%
Both teams scored
23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
43%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
0.60
Away goals / match
+88%
Home attack advantage
+47%
Home defence advantage
+34%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
45%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Sospeter BajanaA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JKT TanzaniaAssistSospeter Bajana

FAQ

What was the result of JKT Tanzania vs Kitayosce?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished JKT Tanzania 1:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JKT Tanzania vs Kitayosce?

JKT Tanzania score 1.29 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 0.75. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 23% of games. Both teams score in 86% of JKT Tanzania's matches and 25% of Kitayosce's.

What form are JKT Tanzania and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games JKT Tanzania have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-3-0 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JKT Tanzania vs Kitayosce?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.