JKT Tanzania vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JKT Tanzania played Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 3 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

JKT Tanzania: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

JKT Tanzania scores 1.33 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.57 and concedes 0.57. League average: 1.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JKT Tanzania 67%, Mtibwa Sugar 14%. Over 2.5: JKT Tanzania 33%, Mtibwa Sugar 14%. League level: BTTS 26%, Over 2.5 24%.

xG, shots and style

JKT Tanzania has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.02. JKT Tanzania: 8.0 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.7.

Match halves

JKT Tanzania: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.14.

Goals by minute

JKT Tanzania: 76-90+ (5 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.69 goals per match, BTTS 26%, Over 2.5 24%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
4Shots2
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
5Shots on target0
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
1.56xG0.82
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
6Corners1
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
129Dangerous attacks93
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
13Fouls15
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0Cards0
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
1.33Goals scored / match0.57
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0.89Goals conceded / match0.57
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
46%Average possession35%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
2.56Shots on target / match1.86
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match3.71
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
2.56Shots on target1.86
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
16.7%Shot conversion15.4%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
46%Possession35%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
1.21xG for1.02
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0.91xG against1.32
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

Shooting quality

JKT Tanzania: Counter-attackingMtibwa Sugar: Counter-attacking
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)32%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.27
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.520.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JKT Tanzania is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - JKT Tanzania · 1.2 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

JKT Tanzania
DLWWW
Season result split
44% W44% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-1
1.78 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 at home
1-2-1
DDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Mtibwa Sugar
DDLDW
Season result split
29% W43% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-2
1.29 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-2
Last 5 away
0-2-2
LDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JKT Tanzania is 133% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - JKT Tanzania · 0.57 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Mtibwa Sugar is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - JKT Tanzania · 0.57 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

JKT Tanzania scoring profile: strong

JKT Tanzania scores in 100% of matches (9 of 9 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 matches).

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: more difficult

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 29% of matches (2 of 7 matches), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

12Goals scored (season)4
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
8Goals conceded (season)4
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
2.22Average goals in match1.14
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
7Goals scored (last 5)2
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal29%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
33%2 goals29%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0%3 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal43%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
22%2 goals14%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0%3 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

26%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time14%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
11%Scored in both halves14%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
40%BTTS - last 520%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time29%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mtibwa Sugar is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - JKT Tanzania · 0.71 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

JKT Tanzania - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
0% leading71% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)0.71
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0.11Goals scored (1st half)0.14
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0.56Average goals (1st half)0.57
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
56%Clean sheet before half-time57%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
89%No goal before half-time86%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

2.22Points per match (2nd half)1.14
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.14
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
1.44Average goals (2nd half)0.29
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
67%Clean sheet after half-time86%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar
11%No goal after half-time86%
JKT TanzaniaMtibwa Sugar

JKT Tanzania - second-half results

67% W22% R11% P
6
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

14% W71% R14% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JKT Tanzania - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.21.6
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.4
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JKT Tanzania
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.68
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JKT Tanzania

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

JKT TanzaniaLigaMtibwa Sugar
Average goals in match 2.221.69 1.14
Both teams scored 67%26% 14%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%24% 14%
Clean sheets 33%44% 57%
Goal before half-time 44%44% 43%
Goal after half-time 89%54% 29%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.69
Average goals per match
26%
Both teams scored
24%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
0.59
Away goals / match
+85%
Home attack advantage
+46%
Home defence advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
44%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of JKT Tanzania vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished JKT Tanzania 0:0 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JKT Tanzania vs Mtibwa Sugar?

JKT Tanzania score 1.33 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.57. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 67% of JKT Tanzania's matches and 14% of Mtibwa Sugar's.

What form are JKT Tanzania and Mtibwa Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games JKT Tanzania have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JKT Tanzania vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The statistical background for JKT Tanzania vs Mtibwa Sugar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.