JKT Tanzania vs Young Africans: match statistics
JKT Tanzania vs Young Africans: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JKT Tanzania played Young Africans in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 30 June 2026. Venue: Al-Hilal Stadium. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
JKT Tanzania: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Young Africans: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
JKT Tanzania scores 1.03 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Young Africans scores 2.39 and concedes 0.32. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JKT Tanzania 45%, Young Africans 21%. Over 2.5: JKT Tanzania 38%, Young Africans 57%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Young Africans has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.21. JKT Tanzania: 6.7 shots per match, Young Africans: 11.2.
Match halves
JKT Tanzania: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.66. Young Africans: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.32.
Goals by minute
JKT Tanzania: 76-90+ (10 goals). Young Africans: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Young Africans are the clear favorites: they sit 1st and have won 5 of their last 5 matches, averaging 3 points in that run, while JKT Tanzania are 6th and have only 1 win in their last 5 with an average of 1 point. Offensively the visitors have a significant advantage — 67 goals scored this season versus 30 for the hosts, and 13 goals in the last 5 matches versus 5 for JKT; goals per game average is 1.38 (visitors) vs 1.00 (hosts). Young Africans create more chances: average xG is 1.94 vs 1.33 for the hosts, and average shots and shots on target are 13.33 and 6.17 for the visitors versus 8.14 and 3.71 for the hosts, i.e. about 2.46 more shots on target per game. Defensively the visitors also dominate — they concede 0.46 goals per away game vs 0.79 for the hosts and have 77% clean sheets away compared to 43% for JKT. Considering the edge in form, chance creation and xG (+0.61), I predict a Young Africans win; probabilities estimated at 70% for the visitors, 20% for a draw and 10% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are low: home 20% and away 23%, versus a league BTTS average of 35%. This is reinforced by very high clean sheet rates — home 80% and away 77% — and low average goals conceded 0.2 and 0.46 per match; additionally home have 80% of matches over 2.5 goals, of which 60% are over 2.5 without BTTS, indicating one-sided high-scoring outcomes. Although hosts average 3.27 goals scored and have a 27% conversion rate on 12.5 shots, and visitors have xG 1.94 versus home 1.82, the dominant signal remains clean sheets being kept. In the last 5 matches signals are mixed — home had BTTS in 60% (avg 1.0 scored, 1.2 conceded), and away in 20% (2.6 scored, 0.2 conceded) — this shows the away side in better form, but not necessarily translating to BTTS. As a result I assign 75% to 'no' and 25% to 'yes', selecting 'no' as the recommended pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals: combining the home side's offensive xG 1.82 with the away side's defensive xG 1.13 yields ~1.48 goals for JKT Tanzania, and combining the away side's offensive xG 1.94 with the home side's defensive xG 0.86 yields ~1.40 goals for the visitors, giving a total of 2.88. With lambda=2.88 the Poisson distribution suggests Under1.5 ≈22% (Over1.5 ≈78%), Under2.5 ≈45% (Over2.5 ≈55%) and Under3.5 ≈67% (Over3.5 ≈33%). Additionally, JKT at home have 93% of matches over 1.5 goals and average 3.27 goals scored at home with a 27% conversion rate, which increases the likelihood of early goals. Young Africans are in form 'wwwww' and have scored 13 and conceded 1 in their last 5 matches, which confirms their attacking strength and supports the combined xG total of 2.88. For these reasons the strongest signal is to play Over 1.5 with roughly 78% probability, while the 2.5 line offers only a moderate edge (~55%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JKT Tanzania led at the break in 9 matches (64%), averaging 1.36 goals scored and 0.21 conceded by half-time, while Young Africans average 0.69 scored and 0.23 conceded by half-time. At home JKT win 93% of matches, scoring on average 3.27 goals and conceding only 0.2 per game, which strongly favors a home victory at Full-Time. Although xG shows 1.82 for JKT and 1.94 for Young Africans, the hosts’ high shot efficiency (conversion 27% versus 11% for the visitors) translates into more actual goals (3.27 vs 1.38 seasonally). The hosts also score on average 2.0 goals after the break and have 93% of matches with at least one second-half goal, so even if the score is level at Half-Time they are most likely to turn the game in their favor. Therefore the safest pick is 1/1 (57%), with X/1 (22%) and X/X (11%) as alternatives; scenarios where the visitors lead at the break are practically negligible (0%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JKT Tanzania | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Young Africans is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - JKT Tanzania · 3 pts / match - Young Africans
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Young Africans is 132% better for: goals scored per match.
1.03 goals / match - JKT Tanzania · 2.39 goals / match - Young Africans
Young Africans is 222% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.03 goals / match - JKT Tanzania · 0.32 goals / match - Young Africans
JKT Tanzania scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Young Africans keeps a clean sheet in 79% (22 of 28 matches).
Young Africans scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JKT Tanzania
Over / Under - Young Africans
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Young Africans is 96% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - JKT Tanzania · 1.96 pts / match - Young Africans
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JKT Tanzania - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Young Africans - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +9 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JKT Tanzania
Young Africans
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| JKT Tanzania | Liga | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.07 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 45% | 35% | ▼ 21% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 38% | 39% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | • 38% | 39% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 61% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Young AfricansGoalPrince DubeAssist: Nzengeli Mpia
- Young AfricansGoalNzengeli MpiaAssist: Allan Okello
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: JKT Tanzania 0 - 0 - 1 Young Africans. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of JKT Tanzania vs Young Africans?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished JKT Tanzania 0:3 Young Africans. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JKT Tanzania vs Young Africans?
JKT Tanzania score 1.03 goals per game on average and Young Africans 2.39. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 45% of JKT Tanzania's matches and 21% of Young Africans's.
What form are JKT Tanzania and Young Africans in?
Over the last 5 games JKT Tanzania have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Young Africans 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JKT Tanzania vs Young Africans?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


