Juve Stabia vs Cesena: match statistics
Juve Stabia vs Cesena: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Juve Stabia played Cesena in Serie B (Italy). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Juve Stabia: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cesena: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Juve Stabia scores 1.18 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Cesena scores 1.27 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Juve Stabia 55%, Cesena 67%. Over 2.5: Juve Stabia 48%, Cesena 58%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Cesena has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.32. Juve Stabia: 12.2 shots per match, Cesena: 12.8.
Match halves
Juve Stabia: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.48. Cesena: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Juve Stabia: 31-45+ (10 goals). Cesena: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Juve Stabia has a clear defensive edge at home: the hosts concede on average 0.81 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 50% of home games, while Cesena concedes 1.44 goals on average away and records only 13% clean sheets. Offensively Juve also looks stronger at home — they score 1.38 goals on average with xG 1.53 and 4.5 shots on target per match, versus 1.06 goals, xG 1.26 and 3.56 shots on target for the away side. Despite this, in the shorter form sample Juve have conceded 9 and scored 7 in the last 5 matches, averaging 1 point per match, while Cesena have scored 6 and conceded 7 in the same period, averaging 1.2 points per match, indicating greater stability from the visitors. The hosts, however, have a strong tendency to draw at home — 50% of home matches end level — and the visitors fail to score in 31% of their away games versus 19% for the hosts, which increases the likelihood of a low-scoring affair. Considering Juve’s superior home defence (0.81 vs 1.44), higher xG (1.53 vs 1.26) and more shots on target, I predict a Juve Stabia win, but with a moderate margin due to the hosts’ draw propensity.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates well above the league average: Juve Stabia 71% and Cesena 63% versus 55% in Serie B, indicating goals frequently come from both sides. In the last 5 matches Juve Stabia recorded BTTS 80% and Cesena 60%; during that span the home side averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while the away team averaged 1.2 scored and 1.4 conceded, highlighting defensive vulnerability on both ends. xG metrics confirm offensive potential: Juve Stabia xG_for 1.59 vs Cesena 1.26, and Cesena allows xG 1.53 (Juve Stabia 1.39), meaning quality chances are being created for opponents. Additionally, clean sheet percentages are low (18% Juve Stabia, 13% Cesena) and average shots on target are 4.65 vs 3.56, which favors goals from both sides, despite Cesena having a higher share of matches without scoring (31% vs 12% for Juve Stabia). Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 75% for "yes" and 25% for "no" and my top pick is "yes" (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project expected goals of 1.56 for Juve Stabia and 1.33 for Cesena (home xG 1.59 vs Cesena’s average xG conceded 1.53; away xG 1.26 vs Juve Stabia’s average xG conceded 1.39), totaling 2.89 goals. Seasonal metrics support Over 1.5: 88% of Juve Stabia’s matches and 75% of Cesena’s matches finished with over 1.5 goals, while Over 2.5 occurred in 59% of home matches and 56% of away matches. A Poisson model with λ=2.89 yields probabilities of at least 2 goals = 78%, at least 3 goals = 55% and at least 4 goals = 33%. Additionally, the share of matches with both teams scoring is 71% for Juve Stabia and 63% for Cesena, raising the chance of at least two different goalscorers and supporting an Over scenario. Consequently, the strongest signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5 (line 1.5), while Over 2.5 remains a moderate-value option with probability around 55%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a draw at Half-Time and a Juve Stabia win at Full-Time (HT/FT: X/1). At the break I predict a draw: home teams average 0.65 goals by Half-Time, the visitors 0.50, and a Half-Time draw occurs in 35% of home matches and 44% of away matches; in the last 5 fixtures the home side led at the break in 40% (2 of 5) and Cesena in 0%, highlighting first-half variability. In second halves Juve Stabia hold the advantage — the home side have accumulated 22 points after the break versus 15 for the visitors and score on average 0.82 goals post-break compared to Cesena’s 0.56, which favors a turnaround. Additionally, the home xG is 1.59 versus 1.26 for the visitors, and the home side average 4.65 shots on target versus 3.56, so Juve Stabia create more chances; both teams, however, convert frequently (both teams score in 71% of home matches and 63% of away matches). Therefore the strongest signal from the data is X/1 (30%), while 1/1 (20%) and X/X (12%) are alternative scenarios with weaker support.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Juve Stabia | Cesena | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cesena is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Juve Stabia · 1.2 pts / match - Cesena
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cesena is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - Juve Stabia · 1.27 goals / match - Cesena
Juve Stabia is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.24 goals / match - Juve Stabia · 1.45 goals / match - Cesena
Juve Stabia scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Cesena keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 33 matches).
Cesena scores in 79% of matches (26 of 33 matches), while Juve Stabia keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Juve Stabia
Over / Under - Cesena
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Juve Stabia is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / match - Juve Stabia · 1.21 pts / match - Cesena
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Juve Stabia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cesena - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Juve Stabia
Cesena
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Juve Stabia | Liga | Cesena | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.42 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | • 55% | 55% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 50% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 26% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 77% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Juve Stabia 0 - 1 - 0 Cesena. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Juve Stabia vs Cesena?
The Serie B match finished Juve Stabia 2:0 Cesena. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Juve Stabia vs Cesena?
Juve Stabia score 1.18 goals per game on average and Cesena 1.27. The Serie B average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Juve Stabia's matches and 67% of Cesena's.
What form are Juve Stabia and Cesena in?
Over the last 5 games Juve Stabia have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cesena 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Juve Stabia vs Cesena?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


