Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildAkureyrarvöllurData current as of 23 July 2026

KA vs Fram: match statistics

KA crest
KA
3 : 4half-time 2:3
Fram crest
Fram

KA vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KA play Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 15 June 2026 at 20:00. Venue: Akureyrarvöllur. Final score: 3:4.

Current form

KA: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Fram: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KA scores 1.60 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. Fram scores 2.73 and concedes 1.87. League average: 4.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KA 73%, Fram 73%. Over 2.5: KA 67%, Fram 73%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Fram has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.66. KA: 14.6 shots per match, Fram: 17.7.

Match halves

KA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.07. Fram: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.40.

Goals by minute

KA: 76-90+ (7 goals). Fram: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 4.04 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Fram is the favorite for this fixture: the visitors have scored 25 goals this season versus KA’s 12 and have netted 14 goals in the last 5 matches compared to KA’s 8 in the same period. Average xG indicates Fram’s advantage — 2.04 per match (away) versus KA’s 1.53 at home, and shot conversion rates are 10% for Fram and 7% for KA, with an average of 5.5 shots on target per match against 4. Defensively the gap is narrower — KA concedes 1.6 goals at home, Fram concedes 1.5 away, but xG against is 1.54 for KA versus 1.26 for Fram, suggesting Fram allows fewer high-quality chances. Fram also holds a significantly better recent points form: 2.6 points per match in the last 5 fixtures versus 1.2 for KA, while the hosts win only 20% of home games and lose 80%; therefore I predict an away win.

Half-by-half

2 : 3
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
KAFram
12Shots20
KAFram
6Shots on target10
KAFram
1.56xG2.29
KAFram
6Corners5
KAFram
53Dangerous attacks47
KAFram
11Fouls18
KAFram
2Cards4
KAFram

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match2.73
KAFram
2.13Goals conceded / match1.87
KAFram
45%Average possession46%
KAFram
5.07Shots on target / match6.2
KAFram

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.6Shots per match17.73
KAFram
5.07Shots on target6.2
KAFram
11%Shot conversion15.4%
KAFram
45%Possession46%
KAFram
1.66xG for2.03
KAFram
1.98xG against1.47
KAFram

Shooting quality

KA: AttackingFram: Counter-attacking
KAFram
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fram is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KA · 2 pts / match - Fram

KA
LLLWD
Season result split
27% W13% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-9
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 2.26BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Fram
LWDWW
Season result split
67% W20% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-2
2.20 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fram is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - KA · 2.73 goals / match - Fram

Fram is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.13 goals / match - KA · 1.87 goals / match - Fram

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

24Goals scored (season)41
KAFram
32Goals conceded (season)28
KAFram
3.73Average goals in match4.6
KAFram
9Goals scored (last 5)12
KAFram
13Goals conceded (last 5)9
KAFram

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal87%
KAFram
53%2 goals73%
KAFram
20%3 goals60%
KAFram
0%4 goals33%
KAFram

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal87%
KAFram
67%2 goals53%
KAFram
40%3 goals33%
KAFram
13%4 goals7%
KAFram

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time47%
KAFram
13%BTTS in both halves20%
KAFram
27%Scored in both halves53%
KAFram

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
KAFram
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KAFram
100%BTTS - last 560%
KAFram

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
KAFram
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
KAFram
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
KAFram

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
KAFram
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
KAFram
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time47%
KAFram

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fram is 107% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - KA · 1.8 pts / match - Fram

KA - half-time state
20% leading27% draw53% trailing
Fram - half-time state
47% leading40% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)1.8
KAFram
0.53Goals scored (1st half)1.33
KAFram
1.07Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
KAFram
1.6Average goals (1st half)2.2
KAFram
33%Clean sheet before half-time47%
KAFram
60%No goal before half-time33%
KAFram

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.53
KAFram
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
KAFram
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)1
KAFram
2.13Average goals (2nd half)2.4
KAFram
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
KAFram
27%No goal after half-time27%
KAFram

KA - second-half results

40% W27% R33% P
13
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fram - second-half results

40% W33% R27% P
27
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.8
Average goals in match1.43.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Fram - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match2.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KA
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
8
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
4
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Fram
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
6
1
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KALigaFram
Average goals in match 3.734.04 4.60
Both teams scored 73%74% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%73% 73%
Clean sheets 13%14% 13%
Goal before half-time 80%82% 73%
Goal after half-time 93%88% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.04
Average goals per match
74%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.21
Home goals / match
1.84
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
65%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KA 2 - 0 - 0 Fram. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

KA Akureyri
2 : 0
Fram Reykjavík
Fram Reykjavík
1 : 2
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of KA vs Fram?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 3:4 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KA and Fram?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KA won 2, Fram won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KA vs Fram?

KA score 1.60 goals per game on average and Fram 2.73. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 73% of KA's matches and 73% of Fram's.

What form are KA and Fram in?

Over the last 5 games KA have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Fram 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs Fram?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KA vs Fram: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.