Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildAkureyrarvöllurData current as of 06 September 2026

KA vs Fram: match statistics

KA crest
KA
3 : 4half-time 2:3
Fram crest
Fram

KA vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KA played Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 15 June 2026. Venue: Akureyrarvöllur. Final score: 3:4.

Current form

KA: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Fram: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KA scores 1.33 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Fram scores 2.78 and concedes 1.78. League average: 4.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KA 56%, Fram 78%. Over 2.5: KA 44%, Fram 78%. League level: BTTS 72%, Over 2.5 74%.

xG, shots and style

Fram has higher xG: 2.12 vs 1.68. KA: 15.0 shots per match, Fram: 17.8.

Match halves

KA: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 1.00. Fram: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.67.

Goals by minute

KA: 76-90+ (5 goals). Fram: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 4.02 goals per match, BTTS 72%, Over 2.5 74%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fram is the favorite for this fixture: the visitors have scored 25 goals this season versus KA’s 12 and have netted 14 goals in the last 5 matches compared to KA’s 8 in the same period. Average xG indicates Fram’s advantage — 2.04 per match (away) versus KA’s 1.53 at home, and shot conversion rates are 10% for Fram and 7% for KA, with an average of 5.5 shots on target per match against 4. Defensively the gap is narrower — KA concedes 1.6 goals at home, Fram concedes 1.5 away, but xG against is 1.54 for KA versus 1.26 for Fram, suggesting Fram allows fewer high-quality chances. Fram also holds a significantly better recent points form: 2.6 points per match in the last 5 fixtures versus 1.2 for KA, while the hosts win only 20% of home games and lose 80%; therefore I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

KA has a seasonal goals average of 3.6 and concedes 2.0 per match, while Fram scores 1.75 and concedes 1.5, indicating both teams have goal-scoring potential. Seasonal BTTS rate is 100% for KA and 50% for Fram, with a league BTTS level of 71%, so the overall league context and especially KA’s home matches strongly favor a Goal/Goal outcome. In the last 5 matches KA had BTTS in 60% of games and Fram in 80%, with last-5 averages: KA 1.6 vs Fram 2.8 goals scored and average goals conceded 1.8 vs 2.0, showing both sides have regularly traded goals in recent form. Additionally xG is similar (KA 2.19 vs Fram 2.04), KA registers more shots on target (7.4 vs 5.5) and has a higher conversion rate (20% vs 10%), while KA has no clean sheets this season (0%), which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering these figures and the league goals average of 4.02, I assess BTTS - Yes probability at 78% vs 22% and recommend the bet: yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: KA has xG_for 2.19 and xG_against vs Fram of 1.26, yielding expected home goals of about (2.19+1.26)/2 ≈ 1.73; Fram has xG_for 2.04 and xG_against vs KA 1.45, giving expected away goals ≈ 1.75, total ≈ 3.48. This aligns with seasonal averages: KA scores at home on average 3.6 goals, Fram away 1.75 (combined 5.35), and the league averages 4.02 goals per match, all favoring an elevated goal count. Additionally KA has 100% of home matches over 2.5 goals, and in the last 5 matches the over 2.5 rate is 60% for KA and 80% for Fram; KA’s BTTS is 100%, which strengthens the over signal. Consequently the strongest and most justified pick is Over on the 2.5 line (I assess over2.5 ≈78% vs under2.5 22%), while Over1.5 is nearly certain (96%), and Over3.5 remains moderate (60%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The primary scenario is 1/1: KA led at the break in 3 of 5 home matches (60%) and scores an average of 1.6 goals by half-time versus 0.5 for Fram, which strongly favors the home side leading after 45 minutes. KA wins at home in 80% of matches and has a seasonal goals-per-game average of 3.6 and xG of 2.19 compared to 2.04 for Fram; with a shot conversion rate of 20% (vs 10% for Fram) the hosts convert chances into goals more effectively. If KA leads at half-time the data suggest they hold the lead — the hosts average 2.2 points when leading at the break versus 0.75 for Fram and have a +5 goal difference at half-time, so I assumed that an HT lead translates into a win in roughly 75% of cases (hence 1/1 = 45% in the distribution). A turnaround risk exists because Fram are in form (guests' last 5: W W D W W, 80% wins), so with a draw at half-time I assigned a 20% chance that KA wins after the break, 14% for a Full-Time draw and 6% for a Fram victory from a draw. In summary: a strong HT signal toward KA (60% leads) and higher conversion efficiency make 1/1 the most reasonable pick with the highest weight of 45%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 3
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
KAFram
12Shots20
KAFram
6Shots on target10
KAFram
1.56xG2.29
KAFram
6Corners5
KAFram
53Dangerous attacks47
KAFram
11Fouls18
KAFram
2Cards4
KAFram

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match2.78
KAFram
1.67Goals conceded / match1.78
KAFram
47%Average possession47%
KAFram
4.56Shots on target / match6.56
KAFram

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match17.78
KAFram
4.56Shots on target6.56
KAFram
8.9%Shot conversion15.6%
KAFram
47%Possession47%
KAFram
1.68xG for2.12
KAFram
1.79xG against1.37
KAFram

Shooting quality

KA: AttackingFram: Counter-attacking
KAFram
Accuracy (shots on target)30%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fram is 44% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - KA · 2.6 pts / match - Fram

KA
WWWLL
Season result split
33% W11% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-5
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-4
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Fram
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W22% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
LWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.31Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fram is 109% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - KA · 2.78 goals / match - Fram

KA is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - KA · 1.78 goals / match - Fram

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

12Goals scored (season)25
KAFram
15Goals conceded (season)16
KAFram
3Average goals in match4.56
KAFram
8Goals scored (last 5)14
KAFram
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
KAFram

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal89%
KAFram
44%2 goals78%
KAFram
11%3 goals67%
KAFram
0%4 goals33%
KAFram

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal89%
KAFram
44%2 goals56%
KAFram
22%3 goals33%
KAFram
11%4 goals0%
KAFram

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time44%
KAFram
11%BTTS in both halves22%
KAFram
22%Scored in both halves67%
KAFram

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS78%
KAFram
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KAFram
40%BTTS - last 580%
KAFram

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
KAFram
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time56%
KAFram
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
KAFram

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KAFram
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
KAFram
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time56%
KAFram

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fram is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - KA · 1.56 pts / match - Fram

KA - half-time state
11% leading33% draw56% trailing
Fram - half-time state
33% leading56% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)1.56
KAFram
0.33Goals scored (1st half)1.11
KAFram
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
KAFram
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.89
KAFram
33%Clean sheet before half-time56%
KAFram
67%No goal before half-time33%
KAFram

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per match (2nd half)1.89
KAFram
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.67
KAFram
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1
KAFram
1.67Average goals (2nd half)2.67
KAFram
56%Clean sheet after half-time33%
KAFram
33%No goal after half-time11%
KAFram

KA - second-half results

56% W22% R22% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fram - second-half results

56% W22% R22% P
14
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.60
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Fram - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match2.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KA
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Fram
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
0
0
16-30
4
3
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
3
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KALigaFram
Average goals in match 3.004.02 4.56
Both teams scored 56%72% 78%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%74% 78%
Clean sheets 22%15% 11%
Goal before half-time 78%83% 67%
Goal after half-time 89%90% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.02
Average goals per match
72%
Both teams scored
74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
15%
Clean sheets
2.14
Home goals / match
1.88
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
12%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KA 2 - 0 - 0 Fram. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

KA Akureyri
2 : 0
Fram Reykjavík
Fram Reykjavík
1 : 2
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of KA vs Fram?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 3:4 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KA and Fram?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KA won 2, Fram won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KA vs Fram?

KA score 1.33 goals per game on average and Fram 2.78. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 56% of KA's matches and 78% of Fram's.

What form are KA and Fram in?

Over the last 5 games KA have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Fram 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs Fram?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KA vs Fram: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.