Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildData current as of 06 September 2026

KA vs ÍBV: match statistics

KA crest
KA
2 : 0half-time 1:0
ÍBV crest
ÍBV

KA vs ÍBV: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KA played ÍBV in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

KA: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. ÍBV: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KA scores 1.00 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. ÍBV scores 1.20 and concedes 3.20. League average: 4.06 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KA 60%, ÍBV 100%. Over 2.5: KA 40%, ÍBV 80%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 77%.

xG, shots and style

KA has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.43. KA: 13.8 shots per match, ÍBV: 12.2.

Match halves

KA: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.60. ÍBV: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

KA: 31-45+ (2 goals). ÍBV: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 4.06 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 77%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1): KA shows a clear defensive edge and superior recent metrics — conceding an average of 2.33 goals per home game versus ÍBV’s 3.5 conceded on the road. Form difference is evident over the last 5 matches: KA conceded 8 and scored 5, while ÍBV conceded 16 and scored 6; KA averages 0.8 points per game in the last 5 fixtures compared to 0.2 for ÍBV. Quality-of-chances analysis shows nearly equal xG (1.43 for KA vs 1.42 for ÍBV), but KA attempts more shots (13.67 vs 12) and more shots on target (4 vs 3), with conversion rates of 7% vs 8%. Although ÍBV has greater possession (55% vs 45%), that advantage does not translate into better defensive outcomes or goal difference (home/away goal difference: KA -4 vs ÍBV -5); neither team has kept a clean sheet yet (0). Considering KA’s lower susceptibility to conceding and stronger recent indicators, the home side appears the favorite in this matchup.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The Both Teams To Score scenario is highly likely — both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and 0% clean sheets this season. Average xG are virtually identical: 1.43 for KA versus 1.42 for ÍBV, and the league average goals is 4.06, indicating open matches with many opportunities. Defensively both sides underperform: KA concedes 3.0 goals per match on average, ÍBV 3.5, with ÍBV conceding 3.2 on average over the last 5 matches. KA averages about 4.67 shots on target per game versus ÍBV’s 3.0 and has a higher conversion rate (11% vs 8%), so both sides have a real scoring capability; additionally the league BTTS is 74% and over 2.5 frequently occurs. Considering these figures (both season BTTS 100%, 0% CS, xG ~1.43/1.42, average concessions 3.0/3.5), I tip BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of ~90%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and defensive analysis yield approximately 1.64 expected goals for KA (xG for KA attack 1.43 vs xG conceded by opponent 1.85) and 1.57 for ÍBV (xG for ÍBV attack 1.42 vs xG conceded to KA 1.71), totaling ~3.21 goals. Seasonally both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals and 100% BTTS, while the league averages 4.06 goals per game — a strong signal for Over. A Poisson model with lambda=3.21 indicates ~62% probability of at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~40% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5), consistent with historical Over 2.5 rates: 67% for KA and 100% for ÍBV. Additionally, KA averages 4.67 SOT with an 11% conversion rate, ÍBV averages 3.0 SOT with an 8% conversion, and ÍBV has conceded 16 goals versus 8 conceded by KA, pointing to an open match with many chances. The strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5 (seasonally 100% for both teams and expected 3.21 goals), hence the recommendation to play over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The home team are moderate favorites to win: season average goals for KA is 1.33 versus 1.00 for ÍBV, and the visitors have a 0% win rate and 100% losses in current statistics, which increases the chances of a home victory. The HT advantage for KA stems from the fact that the home side led at the break in 33% of matches, while ÍBV have never led at the break (0%); KA average 0.67 goals in the first half compared to 0.50 for the visitors, and first-half points average 1.33 vs 0.5. Both teams’ xG are practically equal (1.43 vs 1.42), but both have high xG against (1.71 vs 1.85) and over the season both sides have scored and conceded in 100% of matches, so I expect goals from both teams. In the last 5 matches KA have a 20% win rate versus 0% for ÍBV, and although ÍBV scored more first-half goals in their last 5 games (11 vs 6), this has not translated into wins. The sum of these signals — better HT stats for KA (33% vs 0%), higher season goals average (1.33 vs 1.00) and weaker form of the visitors — indicates the most likely scenario is KA leading at half-time and KA winning at full-time (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
KAÍBV
14Shots9
KAÍBV
4Shots on target1
KAÍBV
1.42xG0.89
KAÍBV
5Corners5
KAÍBV
36Dangerous attacks35
KAÍBV
12Fouls12
KAÍBV
2Cards2
KAÍBV

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.2
KAÍBV
1.6Goals conceded / match3.2
KAÍBV
46%Average possession48%
KAÍBV
4.2Shots on target / match4
KAÍBV

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.8Shots per match12.2
KAÍBV
4.2Shots on target4
KAÍBV
7.2%Shot conversion9.8%
KAÍBV
46%Possession48%
KAÍBV
1.51xG for1.43
KAÍBV
1.87xG against1.77
KAÍBV

Shooting quality

KA: BalancedÍBV: Balanced
KAÍBV
Accuracy (shots on target)30%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KA is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KA · 0.2 pts / match - ÍBV

KA
LLDLW
Season result split
20% W20% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 at home
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
ÍBV
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W20% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ÍBV is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - KA · 1.2 goals / match - ÍBV

KA is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - KA · 3.2 goals / match - ÍBV

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

ÍBV scoring profile: very strong

ÍBV scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

5Goals scored (season)6
KAÍBV
8Goals conceded (season)16
KAÍBV
2.6Average goals in match4.4
KAÍBV
5Goals scored (last 5)6
KAÍBV
8Goals conceded (last 5)16
KAÍBV

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
KAÍBV
20%2 goals20%
KAÍBV
0%3 goals0%
KAÍBV
0%4 goals0%
KAÍBV

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
KAÍBV
60%2 goals80%
KAÍBV
20%3 goals40%
KAÍBV
0%4 goals40%
KAÍBV

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time40%
KAÍBV
20%BTTS in both halves0%
KAÍBV
20%Scored in both halves0%
KAÍBV

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
KAÍBV
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KAÍBV
60%BTTS - last 5100%
KAÍBV

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KAÍBV
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time80%
KAÍBV
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
KAÍBV

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KAÍBV
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
KAÍBV
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
KAÍBV

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ÍBV is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.6 pts / match - KA · 1 pts / match - ÍBV

KA - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing
ÍBV - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.6Points per match (1st half)1
KAÍBV
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.6
KAÍBV
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)1.6
KAÍBV
1.2Average goals (1st half)2.2
KAÍBV
40%Clean sheet before half-time20%
KAÍBV
60%No goal before half-time40%
KAÍBV

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)0.2
KAÍBV
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
KAÍBV
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1.6
KAÍBV
1.4Average goals (2nd half)2.2
KAÍBV
40%Clean sheet after half-time0%
KAÍBV
40%No goal after half-time60%
KAÍBV

KA - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ÍBV - second-half results

0% W20% R80% P
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
ÍBV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.61.6
Average goals in match2.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KA
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

ÍBV
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
4
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
80%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
45%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

ÍBV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KALigaÍBV
Average goals in match 2.604.06 4.40
Both teams scored 60%74% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%77% 80%
Clean sheets 20%14% 0%
Goal before half-time 60%83% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%89% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.06
Average goals per match
74%
Both teams scored
77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.20
Home goals / match
1.86
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
46%
3 goals
20%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): KA 2 - 1 - 0 ÍBV. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

ÍB Vestmannaeyja
3 : 4
KA Akureyri
KA Akureyri
1 : 0
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
0 : 0
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of KA vs ÍBV?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 2:0 ÍBV. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KA and ÍBV?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches KA won 2, ÍBV won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KA vs ÍBV?

KA score 1.00 goals per game on average and ÍBV 1.20. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 60% of KA's matches and 100% of ÍBV's.

What form are KA and ÍBV in?

Over the last 5 games KA have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and ÍBV 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs ÍBV?

The statistical background for KA vs ÍBV — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.