Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildAkureyrarvöllurData current as of 06 September 2026

KA vs Valur: match statistics

KA crest
KA
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Valur crest
Valur

KA vs Valur: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KA played Valur in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 22 May 2026. Venue: Akureyrarvöllur. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

KA: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Valur: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KA scores 1.29 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Valur scores 2.29 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.88 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KA 57%, Valur 86%. Over 2.5: KA 43%, Valur 100%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 74%.

xG, shots and style

Valur has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.60. KA: 14.0 shots per match, Valur: 13.6.

Match halves

KA: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.86. Valur: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

KA: 76-90+ (3 goals). Valur: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.88 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 74%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Valur holds a clear offensive edge: 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 per match) and averages 3.0 goals on the road, while KA has 7 goals in the last 5 (1.4 per match) and 1.25 at home. The visitors register more shots on target (6 per match vs 4 for KA) and have a significantly higher shot conversion rate – 25% versus 9% for the hosts, directly translating into more goals. On the other hand Valur concedes many goals away (2.5 on average, xG against 2.6), while KA concedes 1.75 at home with xG against 1.61, suggesting KA can find ways to score. Both teams have similar points tempo over the last 5 matches (1.8 points per match and 3 wins each), but KA have lost 75% of home matches, and Valur have 0% of away matches without scoring, so the visitors are the favourites. The sum of these factors points to an away win for Valur in an open game with an elevated goal count (average goals: 5.5 in Valur away matches vs 3.0 in KA home matches).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams give a strong signal for BTTS: KA has a seasonal BTTS rate of 80%, Valur 100%, with the league average BTTS at 74%. This season KA scores 2.0 goals and concedes 1.8 on average, while Valur scores 3.0 and concedes 2.5, indicating both sides regularly score and concede. In the last 5 matches KA scored 7 goals (1.4 per match) and conceded 5 (1.0), Valur scored 13 (2.6 per match) and conceded 11 (2.2); additionally recent-5 xG is 1.97 (KA) vs 1.45 (Valur) in attack and 1.55 (KA) vs 2.53 (Valur) in defence, suggesting Valur creates chances but also concedes many. Both teams have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, KA has the combination of over 2.5 goals and BTTS in 80% of fixtures, Valur in 100%, and clean sheets are rare (KA 20%, Valur 0%); additionally Valur’s shot conversion is 25% vs KA’s 14%, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. On this basis I assign BTTS 88% vs 12% and recommend the 'yes' tip as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have goal-friendly profiles: KA scores an average of 2.0 goals and concedes 1.8, Valur scores 3.0 and concedes 2.5, while the league average is 3.88 goals per match. xG is 1.71 for KA and 1.43 for Valur (total xG = 3.14); however Valur shows higher shot efficiency — 25% on 6.0 SOT versus KA’s 14% on 4.8 SOT — which explains their goals scored exceeding xG. Both sides register high BTTS rates (KA 80%, Valur 100%) and seasonally both teams have had 100% of matches over 2.5 goals; additionally over 2.5 coincides with BTTS in 80% of KA’s matches and 100% of Valur’s. Considering the combined xG (3.14), the league average (3.88) and the consistent historical 100% over 2.5 for both teams, the strongest signal is Over 2.5. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 2.5 (estimated probabilities: Over 2.5 ~85%, Over 1.5 ~97%, Over 3.5 ~65%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Valur did not lead at the break in any match (0% leads), and the away half-time draw occurred in 100% of cases, so the most likely half-time score is a draw. KA led at the break in 40% of games and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time, giving them potential to seize the initiative after the break. Over the full match KA has a higher average points per game (1.8) and a higher win rate (60% versus Valur’s 50%), and their xG is 1.71 compared to 1.43 for the opponents, which gives the home side a slight edge. Both teams usually score and rarely keep a clean sheet (home clean sheets 80%, away 100%), so I expect a drawn half-time with goals and a turnaround in the second half. On that basis the safest pick is a half-time draw with KA winning full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
KAValur
20Shots13
KAValur
4Shots on target3
KAValur
1.96xG1.25
KAValur
8Corners6
KAValur
60Dangerous attacks31
KAValur
11Fouls17
KAValur
1Cards3
KAValur

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.29Goals scored / match2.29
KAValur
1.29Goals conceded / match2
KAValur
48%Average possession45%
KAValur
4.14Shots on target / match5.14
KAValur

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match13.57
KAValur
4.14Shots on target5.14
KAValur
9.2%Shot conversion16.8%
KAValur
48%Possession45%
KAValur
1.6xG for1.63
KAValur
1.74xG against2.32
KAValur

Shooting quality

KA: AttackingValur: Counter-attacking
KAValur
Accuracy (shots on target)30%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KA is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KA · 1.8 pts / match - Valur

KA
DLWWW
Season result split
43% W14% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-3
1.43 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
LLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Valur
WWLLW
Season result split
57% W0% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-3
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 2.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Valur is 78% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - KA · 2.29 goals / match - Valur

KA is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - KA · 2 goals / match - Valur

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

Valur scoring profile: very strong

Valur scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

9Goals scored (season)16
KAValur
9Goals conceded (season)14
KAValur
2.57Average goals in match4.29
KAValur
7Goals scored (last 5)13
KAValur
4Goals conceded (last 5)11
KAValur

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal100%
KAValur
43%2 goals71%
KAValur
0%3 goals43%
KAValur
0%4 goals14%
KAValur

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
KAValur
43%2 goals71%
KAValur
14%3 goals29%
KAValur
0%4 goals14%
KAValur

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time57%
KAValur
14%BTTS in both halves0%
KAValur
29%Scored in both halves43%
KAValur

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS86%
KAValur
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
KAValur
60%BTTS - last 580%
KAValur

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KAValur
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time86%
KAValur
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time43%
KAValur

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
KAValur
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
KAValur
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
KAValur

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Valur is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / match - KA · 1.43 pts / match - Valur

KA - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing
Valur - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per match (1st half)1.43
KAValur
0.43Goals scored (1st half)1.43
KAValur
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)1.14
KAValur
1.14Average goals (1st half)2.57
KAValur
43%Clean sheet before half-time29%
KAValur
57%No goal before half-time14%
KAValur

After half-time (2nd half)

1.86Points per match (2nd half)1.14
KAValur
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
KAValur
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
KAValur
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.71
KAValur
57%Clean sheet after half-time43%
KAValur
29%No goal after half-time43%
KAValur

KA - second-half results

57% W14% R29% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding307%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Valur - second-half results

29% W29% R43% P
10
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding197%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.40
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Valur - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.82.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KA
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Valur
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
86%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Valur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.69
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.98
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KALigaValur
Average goals in match 2.573.88 4.29
Both teams scored 57%74% 86%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%74% 100%
Clean sheets 29%14% 14%
Goal before half-time 71%81% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%91% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.88
Average goals per match
74%
Both teams scored
74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.07
Home goals / match
1.81
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
12%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
91%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
42%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ValurYellow cardLúkas Logi Heimisson
  2. ValurSubstitutionOn: Birkir HeimissonOff: Albin Skoglund
  3. ValurYellow cardMyles Veldman
  4. ValurSubstitutionOn: Ólafur Flóki StephensenOff: Myles Veldman
  5. ValurYellow cardHólmar Örn Eyjólfsson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KA 0 - 0 - 2 Valur. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KA Akureyri
2 : 5
Valur Reykjavík
Valur Reykjavík
3 : 1
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of KA vs Valur?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 0:1 Valur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KA and Valur?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KA won 0, Valur won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KA vs Valur?

KA score 1.29 goals per game on average and Valur 2.29. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 57% of KA's matches and 86% of Valur's.

What form are KA and Valur in?

Over the last 5 games KA have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Valur 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs Valur?

The statistical background for KA vs Valur — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.