Belgium - First Division BData current as of 13 September 2026

KAA Gent II vs Club Brugge II: match statistics

KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
3 : 2half-time 0:0
Club Brugge II crest
Club Brugge II
155%(1.93)
X25%(3.80)
220%(3.32)

KAA Gent II, despite average form, display better home statistics than Club Brugge II in away matches. The hosts win 29% of their home games and have a goal difference of -5, whereas the visitors lose as many as 71% of their away matches with a -8 goal difference. Club Brugge II has not won any of their last 5 matches (0.4 PPG), indicating a deep form crisis. Both teams have identical shot conversion (10%) and possession (58%), but the hosts are more efficient in home attack (1.21 goals/match vs 1.14 goals/match for the visitors away). The home advantage and the visitors' terrible form point towards a KAA Gent II victory, although the class difference is not significant, which leaves room for a draw. The xG statistics are balanced, but the psychological edge of the hosts could prove crucial.

KAA Gent II vs Club Brugge II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KAA Gent II played Club Brugge II in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

KAA Gent II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Club Brugge II: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KAA Gent II scores 1.36 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Club Brugge II scores 1.03 and concedes 1.76. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KAA Gent II 54%, Club Brugge II 59%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent II 61%, Club Brugge II 59%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

KAA Gent II has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.32. KAA Gent II: 12.2 shots per match, Club Brugge II: 11.5.

Match halves

KAA Gent II: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.68. Club Brugge II: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

KAA Gent II: 61-75 (9 goals). Club Brugge II: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KAA Gent II, despite average form, display better home statistics than Club Brugge II in away matches. The hosts win 29% of their home games and have a goal difference of -5, whereas the visitors lose as many as 71% of their away matches with a -8 goal difference. Club Brugge II has not won any of their last 5 matches (0.4 PPG), indicating a deep form crisis. Both teams have identical shot conversion (10%) and possession (58%), but the hosts are more efficient in home attack (1.21 goals/match vs 1.14 goals/match for the visitors away). The home advantage and the visitors' terrible form point towards a KAA Gent II victory, although the class difference is not significant, which leaves room for a draw. The xG statistics are balanced, but the psychological edge of the hosts could prove crucial.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
31Shots16
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
10Shots on target6
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
3.24xG1.62
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
9Corners1
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
84Dangerous attacks26
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
14Fouls10
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
3Cards1
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
1.36Goals scored / match1.03
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
1.57Goals conceded / match1.76
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
57%Average possession56%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
4.25Shots on target / match3.97
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.18Shots per match11.48
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
4.25Shots on target3.97
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
11.1%Shot conversion9%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
57%Possession56%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
1.47xG for1.32
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
1.62xG against1.79
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

Shooting quality

KAA Gent II: BalancedClub Brugge II: Balanced
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KAA Gent II is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 0.4 pts / match - Club Brugge II

KAA Gent II
LWLDL
Season result split
39% W14% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Club Brugge II
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
14% W21% D66% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-19
0.62 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-10
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 2.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KAA Gent II is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1.36 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.03 goals / match - Club Brugge II

KAA Gent II is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.76 goals / match - Club Brugge II

KAA Gent II scoring profile: very strong

KAA Gent II scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 matches).

Club Brugge II scoring profile: very strong

Club Brugge II scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).

38Goals scored (season)30
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
44Goals conceded (season)51
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
2.93Average goals in match2.79
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
6Goals scored (last 5)5
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
14Goals conceded (last 5)12
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal69%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
46%2 goals28%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
14%3 goals7%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
7%4 goals0%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal86%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
43%2 goals59%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
25%3 goals21%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
11%4 goals7%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time10%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
0%BTTS in both halves7%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
32%Scored in both halves14%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
80%BTTS - last 560%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time66%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KAA Gent II is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 0.83 pts / match - Club Brugge II

KAA Gent II - half-time state
32% leading39% draw29% trailing
Club Brugge II - half-time state
14% leading41% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)0.83
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.28
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
1.39Average goals (1st half)1
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
54%Clean sheet before half-time48%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
54%No goal before half-time76%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)1
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)1.03
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.79
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
50%Clean sheet after half-time31%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II
46%No goal after half-time41%
KAA Gent IIClub Brugge II

KAA Gent II - second-half results

36% W32% D32% L
38
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Club Brugge II - second-half results

17% W48% D34% L
24
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KAA Gent II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.4
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Club Brugge II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
9
9
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Club Brugge II
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
5
3
16-30
2
9
31-45
5
8
46-60
9
14
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Club Brugge II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KAA Gent IILigaClub Brugge II
Average goals in match 2.932.78 2.79
Both teams scored 54%54% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%52% 59%
Clean sheets 21%27% 14%
Goal before half-time 71%71% 66%
Goal after half-time 79%77% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KAA Gent IIYellow cardMathias Delorge-Knieper
  2. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Naïm AmengaiOff: Jesse Bisiwu
  3. Club Brugge IIGoalVince Chijioke OsujiAssist: Tobias Jensen Lund
  4. KAA Gent IIGoalJassim MazouzAssist: Briek Morel
  5. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Ruslan VydyshOff: Mohammed El Âdfaoui
  6. KAA Gent IIYellow cardBriek Morel
  7. Club Brugge IIGoalJakke Van BritsomAssist: Tian Koren
  8. Club Brugge IIYellow cardNaïm Amengai
  9. KAA Gent IIYellow cardWout Asselman
  10. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Alejandro Granados TorresOff: Vince Chijioke Osuji
  11. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Jessi SilvaOff: Jakke Van Britsom
  12. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Garcia GarciaOff: Tian Koren
  13. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Ali Donny SyllaOff: Abubakar Idris Abdullahi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Lander BultynckMatches officiated: 13
3.31Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins23%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KAA Gent II 1 - 0 - 0 Club Brugge II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Club Brugge KV II
0 : 4
KAA Gent B

FAQ

What was the result of KAA Gent II vs Club Brugge II?

The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 3:2 Club Brugge II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs Club Brugge II?

KAA Gent II score 1.36 goals per game on average and Club Brugge II 1.03. The First Division B average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 54% of KAA Gent II's matches and 59% of Club Brugge II's.

What form are KAA Gent II and Club Brugge II in?

Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Club Brugge II 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs Club Brugge II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KAA Gent II vs Club Brugge II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.