Belgium - First Division BPlanet Group ArenaData current as of 23 October 2026

KAA Gent II vs FCV Dender EH: match statistics

KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
0 : 1half-time 0:0
FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH

KAA Gent II vs FCV Dender EH: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KAA Gent II played FCV Dender EH in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 11 September 2026. Venue: Planet Group Arena. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

KAA Gent II: 1-1-1, 1.33 points/match. FCV Dender EH: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match.

Goal statistics

KAA Gent II scores 1.33 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. FCV Dender EH scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KAA Gent II 33%, FCV Dender EH 25%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent II 67%, FCV Dender EH 25%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

FCV Dender EH has higher xG: 1.89 vs 1.03. KAA Gent II: 8.3 shots per match, FCV Dender EH: 16.5.

Match halves

KAA Gent II: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.33. FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

KAA Gent II: 0-15 (2 goals). FCV Dender EH: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FCV Dender EH sit 2nd, while KAA Gent II are only 12th, and the visitors have won 3 of their 4 league matches, suffering just one defeat. Current form also favors Dender: they have collected 9 points from their last 5 matches, compared with the hosts’ 5 points, while Gent II have conceded 9 goals during that period. The visitors create significantly more chances away from home, averaging 20.5 shots and 7 on target per match, with an xG of 2.26 compared with Gent II’s 1.32. The hosts’ defense allows opponents an xG of 2.05 and concedes an average of 2 goals at home, so they should struggle to contain Dender’s attack. Gent II average 2 goals at home and are yet to lose in this setting, but the visitors’ superior chance creation and season-long results point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The “No” pick has a slight edge, as KAA Gent II have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches so far, while FCV Dender EH have failed to score in 50% of their away fixtures. Although the hosts have conceded an average of 1.8 goals over their last 5 matches, their opponent is defensively solid: Dender have conceded only 0.8 goals per game during this period and allowed an xG of 1.35. The visitors’ attack looks active, averaging 20.5 shots and 7 shots on target, but a very low conversion rate of 5% reduces confidence that they will break down the hosts. BTTS in the last five appearances of both teams stands at 40% each, below the league average of 46%, further supporting a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model expects 2.60 goals, with FCV Dender EH showing greater attacking potential: its average xG stands at 2.26 compared with 1.52 for KAA Gent II. However, current form limits the outlook for a high-scoring game, as the hosts have averaged 1.0 goal and the visitors 1.4 over their last 5 matches, while only 40% of the teams’ games have gone Over 2.5 goals. Dender conceded just 0.8 goals per match during this period, lowering the hosts’ projected tally to around 1.05 goals despite conceding an average of 1.8 goals across their last five outings. In addition, 100% of both teams’ matches so far have stayed Under 3.5 goals, making Under 3.5 the safest option, with an estimated 74% margin of safety.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by an FCV Dender EH win, as the visitors average 2.26 xG from 20.5 shots and 7 shots on target, compared with KAA Gent II’s 1.52 xG and 12.5 shots. In their last five matches, Dender won three times, scoring an average of 1.4 goals and conceding just 0.8, while Gent II recorded only one victory, scoring 1.0 goal and conceding 1.8. The visitors’ advantage is particularly evident after the break: they have not conceded a single goal after half-time in this run, whereas the hosts conceded an average of 1.2 goals in the second half. Gent II do have a perfect record of two wins in their available home matches and led at the break in both, but this is a very small sample, while the broader form and the visitors’ superiority in chance creation point towards a late turnaround. A first-half draw remains a realistic possibility, as both teams recorded a 20% rate of half-time draws in their last five matches, while the average number of first-half goals was only 1.2 for Gent II and 1.6 for Dender.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
5Shots20
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1Shots on target6
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
0.62xG2.23
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1Corners6
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
30Dangerous attacks77
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
8Fouls14
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
0Cards2
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1.33Goals scored / match1.5
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
2Goals conceded / match0.5
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
49%Average possession47%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
3.33Shots on target / match6.5
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.33Shots per match16.5
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
3.33Shots on target6.5
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
16%Shot conversion9.1%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
49%Possession47%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1.03xG for1.89
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1.82xG against1.23
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

Shooting quality

KAA Gent II: Efficient finishingFCV Dender EH: Attacking
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
Accuracy (shots on target)40%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FCV Dender EH is 69% better for: last-5 form.

1.33 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 2.25 pts / match - FCV Dender EH

KAA Gent II
LWD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%
FCV Dender EH
LWWW
Season result split
75% W0% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FCV Dender EH is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.5 goals / match - FCV Dender EH

FCV Dender EH is 300% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 0.5 goals / match - FCV Dender EH

KAA Gent II scoring profile: mixed

KAA Gent II scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

4Goals scored (season)6
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
6Goals conceded (season)2
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
3.33Average goals in match2
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
4Goals scored (last 5)6
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal75%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
67%2 goals75%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
0%3 goals0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
0%4 goals0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal50%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
67%2 goals0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%3 goals0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%4 goals0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time25%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%Scored in both halves75%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%BTTS - last 525%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KAA Gent II is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 1.75 pts / match - FCV Dender EH

KAA Gent II - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing
FCV Dender EH - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.75
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1Goals scored (1st half)0.75
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.25
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%Clean sheet before half-time50%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%No goal before half-time25%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)2.5
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
1.67Average goals (2nd half)0.75
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
33%Clean sheet after half-time100%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH
67%No goal after half-time25%
KAA Gent IIFCV Dender EH

KAA Gent II - second-half results

33% W0% D67% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding49%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

75% W25% D0% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KAA Gent II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.3
Goals conceded / match0.71.3
Average goals in match1.71.7
1 goal100%100%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals33%33%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 3
FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.752.50
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.30.8
1 goal100%75%
2 goals25%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal25%25%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.79
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
169%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
31%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KAA Gent IILigaFCV Dender EH
Average goals in match▲ 3.332.79▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▼ 33%46%▼ 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%57%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▲ 33%29%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%79%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%82%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHYellow cardMalcolm Viltard
  2. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Trey KongoloOff: Mamadou Aliou Diallo
  3. FCV Dender EHGoalKobe CoolsAssist: Krzysztof Koton
  4. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Adam NhailiOff: Amine Daali
  5. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Gerard VandeplasOff: Emmanuel Mballa Amougou
  6. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Jemiah UmoluOff: Mohammed El Âdfaoui
  7. FCV Dender EHYellow cardNathan Rodes
  8. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: David ToshevskiOff: Krzysztof Koton

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of KAA Gent II vs FCV Dender EH?

The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 0:1 FCV Dender EH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs FCV Dender EH?

KAA Gent II score 1.33 goals per game on average and FCV Dender EH 1.50. The First Division B average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KAA Gent II's matches and 25% of FCV Dender EH's.

What form are KAA Gent II and FCV Dender EH in?

Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and FCV Dender EH 3-0-1 (2.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs FCV Dender EH?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.