KAA Gent II vs Olympic Charleroi: match statistics
KAA Gent II displays significantly better form than Olympic Charleroi, which is particularly evident in the last five matches – the hosts have earned 9 points (3 wins), while the visitors only 1 point (4 defeats). The hosts have an advantage in possession (57% vs 47%) and a better goal difference in home matches (-4 vs -5 for the visitors in away games). Olympic Charleroi holds a distant 17th place in the table with just an 18% away win rate and concedes an average of 1.73 goals in away matches. xG values indicate a slight advantage for the hosts (1.58 vs 1.43), which, combined with home advantage and the visitors' disastrous form, points to a victory for KAA Gent II. Nevertheless, the hosts' poor home win rate (only 27%) and the visitors' tendency to draw away (45%) open up the possibility of a share of the points.
KAA Gent II vs Olympic Charleroi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KAA Gent II played Olympic Charleroi in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 15 February 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
KAA Gent II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Olympic Charleroi: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
KAA Gent II scores 1.39 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Olympic Charleroi scores 0.78 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KAA Gent II 48%, Olympic Charleroi 48%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent II 52%, Olympic Charleroi 57%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
KAA Gent II has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.38. KAA Gent II: 13.2 shots per match, Olympic Charleroi: 11.7.
Match halves
KAA Gent II: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.65. Olympic Charleroi: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
KAA Gent II: 61-75 (9 goals). Olympic Charleroi: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KAA Gent II displays significantly better form than Olympic Charleroi, which is particularly evident in the last five matches – the hosts have earned 9 points (3 wins), while the visitors only 1 point (4 defeats). The hosts have an advantage in possession (57% vs 47%) and a better goal difference in home matches (-4 vs -5 for the visitors in away games). Olympic Charleroi holds a distant 17th place in the table with just an 18% away win rate and concedes an average of 1.73 goals in away matches. xG values indicate a slight advantage for the hosts (1.58 vs 1.43), which, combined with home advantage and the visitors' disastrous form, points to a victory for KAA Gent II. Nevertheless, the hosts' poor home win rate (only 27%) and the visitors' tendency to draw away (45%) open up the possibility of a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KAA Gent II | Olympic Charleroi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KAA Gent II is 800% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 0.2 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KAA Gent II is 78% better for: goals scored per match.
1.39 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 0.78 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi
KAA Gent II is 54% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 2 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi
KAA Gent II scores in 65% of matches (15 of 23 matches), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).
Olympic Charleroi scores in 52% of matches (12 of 23 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KAA Gent II
Over / Under - Olympic Charleroi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KAA Gent II is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.48 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 0.78 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KAA Gent II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Olympic Charleroi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KAA Gent II
Olympic Charleroi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| KAA Gent II | Liga | Olympic Charleroi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.70 | 2.75 | • 2.78 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 54% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 52% | 51% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 27% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 71% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 77% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: KAA Gent II 1 - 0 - 0 Olympic Charleroi. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KAA Gent II vs Olympic Charleroi?
The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 1:3 Olympic Charleroi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs Olympic Charleroi?
KAA Gent II score 1.39 goals per game on average and Olympic Charleroi 0.78. The First Division B average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 48% of KAA Gent II's matches and 48% of Olympic Charleroi's.
What form are KAA Gent II and Olympic Charleroi in?
Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Olympic Charleroi 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs Olympic Charleroi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.