KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing: match statistics
KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KAA Gent II played RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 19 December 2025. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
KAA Gent II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. RFC Seraing: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
KAA Gent II scores 1.24 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 0.88 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KAA Gent II 41%, RFC Seraing 50%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent II 47%, RFC Seraing 44%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
KAA Gent II has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.34. KAA Gent II: 12.1 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 12.0.
Match halves
KAA Gent II: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.59. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
KAA Gent II: 61-75 (7 goals). RFC Seraing: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KAA Gent II | RFC Seraing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
RFC Seraing is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 1 pts / match - RFC Seraing
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KAA Gent II is 41% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 0.88 goals / match - RFC Seraing
KAA Gent II is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.56 goals / match - RFC Seraing
KAA Gent II scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
RFC Seraing scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KAA Gent II
Over / Under - RFC Seraing
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KAA Gent II is 113% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 0.69 pts / match - RFC Seraing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KAA Gent II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
RFC Seraing - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KAA Gent II
RFC Seraing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| KAA Gent II | Liga | RFC Seraing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.53 | 2.67 | ▼ 2.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 27% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 72% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 78% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: KAA Gent II 1 - 0 - 0 RFC Seraing. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?
The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 3:1 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?
KAA Gent II score 1.24 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 0.88. The First Division B average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 41% of KAA Gent II's matches and 50% of RFC Seraing's.
What form are KAA Gent II and RFC Seraing in?
Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?
The statistical background for KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.